<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The American Interest</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/940</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NATO, R.I.P.</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/nato_r_i_p_8090</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In what might be described as a quest for coherence through
commodification, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has hired a
former Coca-Cola executive to foster greater understanding about its reason for
being.[1] But can an alliance
emulate a soft drink giant&#039;s success at reinvention? Not likely. Coke has been
creative--though not always successful--in its self-presentation, but no one
has ever doubted what it is: a beverage. NATO&#039;s problem is that its purpose is
no longer clear, even to its own members. In several key NATO states, few
people know what the alliance does, let alone how it serves their interests. And
who can blame them?&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/nato_r_i_p_8090&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/rajan_menon/recent_work">Rajan Menon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/940">The American Interest</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/nato">NATO</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8090 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Myth of Russian Resurgence</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/the_myth_of_russian_resurgence_4951</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to much recent commentary, Russia is back as a major power. The cover of the July 15, 2006 Economist, a magazine noted for its measured tone and sober assessments featured a phtograph of President Vladimir Putin, with a confident air and stern visage, next to the words &amp;quot;Living with a Strong Russia.&amp;quot; New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman quipped that &amp;quot;Russia has gone from the sick man of Europe to the boos man.&amp;quot; And in the Holidays (November/December) 2006 issue of The American Interest, Paul Dibb made the case for taking Russia&amp;#39;s return seriously. Russia&amp;#39;s resurgence, we are&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/the_myth_of_russian_resurgence_4951&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/rajan_menon/recent_work">Rajan Menon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/940">The American Interest</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Myth of Russian Resurgence.pdf" length="323499" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 07:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4951 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
