<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Political Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>L.A. Area Chamber of Commerce Endorses Key Election Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/l_area_chamber_commerce_endorses_key_election_reform</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Contact: Mr. Gautam Dutta, Esq. (213.480.0994; dutta@newamerica.net)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Los Angeles CA -- The Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce has endorsed a critical election reform:  Instant Runoff Voting (IRV).  Former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan, the League of Women Voters of Los Angeles, and key labor unions like UNITE HERE have also endorsed IRV. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Instant Runoff Voting will create more competitive races, increase voter participation and eliminate costly runoff elections,&amp;quot; said Gary Toebben, President &amp;amp; CEO, Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce. &amp;quot;The L.A. Area Chamber strongly urges the City Council and Mayor Villaraigosa to put IRV on the ballot this&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2008/l_area_chamber_commerce_endorses_key_election_reform&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/guatam_dutta/recent_work">Guatam Dutta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steve_hill/recent_work">Steve Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7147 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CA Event: Instant Runoff Voting and Minorities in L.A.</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/instant_runoff_voting_and_minorities</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
04/19/2008 - 10:00am&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
Currently, Los Angeles&#039; local elections run on a wasteful, two-round election  system.  Last May, only 6 percent of voters turned out for the runoff election for the Los Angeles Community College Districts -- an election that cost taxpayers $5 million, or $40 per voter.  For this reason, the LA City Council is seriously considering Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) for local elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By combining the general and runoff election into 1 single election, IRV will save millions of taxpayer dollars and help raise voter turnout.  IRV allows voters to rank their choices, in order of preference (1-2-3).  This way, if your first choice cannot win, your vote will go to your next choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please join the New America Foundation/Political Reform Program and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://laurbanroundtable.typepad.com/my_weblog/about_laupr/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable&lt;/a&gt; for an engaging discussion on political reform and its impact on communities of color.
&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/gautam_dutta/recent_work">Gautam Dutta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6988 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arnold vs. Arnold</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/arnold_vs_arnold_7011</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Education cuts and reform campaigns can be the drinking and driving of California politics. Each carries certain risks when pursued separately. Combined, they can be deadly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is a truth that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has found hard to accept. Three years ago, just as he launched his breakneck drive to win voter approval of budget and political reforms, he decided to withhold part of a mandated increase in education funding from his 2005-06 budget proposal. The delay in Proposition 98 funding soon consumed the public attention that Schwarzenegger wanted directed toward his reform proposals. His favorability rating dropped more than 20&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/arnold_vs_arnold_7011&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7011 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taking Back Our Fiscal Future</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/taking_back_our_fiscal</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The authors of this paper are longtime federal budget and policy experts who have been drawn together by a deep concern about the nation’s long-term fiscal outlook. Our group covers the ideological spectrum. We are affiliated with a diverse set of organizations. We have been meeting informally for over a year, under the auspices of The Brookings Institution and The Heritage Foundation, to define the dimensions and consequences of the looming federal budget problem, examine alternative solutions, and reach agreement on what should be done. Despite our diverse philosophies and political leanings, we have found solid common ground. We&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/taking_back_our_fiscal&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1276">The Brookings Institution and The Heritage Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/TakingBackOurFiscalFuture.pdf" length="122064" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fiscal Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6982 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Way Out Of the Nader Dilemma</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/way_out_nader_dilemma_6868</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With Ralph Nader in the race, Democrats are fuming and no doubt preparing to use the same legal tricks they used in 2004 to keep Nader off the ballot in many states. Republicans are cackling with glee. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But Republicans shouldn&#039;t cackle too loudly. They&#039;ve also been hurt by the spoiler dilemma.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In fact, the GOP lost control of the U.S. Senate due to Libertarian Party candidates in Montana, Washington, Missouri, Nevada and South Dakota spoiling things for Republicans. And many observers believe that Bill Clinton beat George H.W. Bush in 1992 only because Ross Perot drained away enough votes from Bush.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/way_out_nader_dilemma_6868&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1168">Philadelphia Daily News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/instant_runoff">Instant Runoff</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6868 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joe Mathews</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
Irvine Senior Fellow&lt;p&gt;Joe Mathews, a fourth-generation Californian, writes about his home state and its politics, media, labor, and real estate. He is the author of The People’s Machine: Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Rise of Blockbuster Democracy (PublicAffairs, 2006), an account of Governor Schwarzenegger’s first term and his use of ballot measures as governing tools. Before joining New America, he was a reporter for eight years at the Los Angeles Times, where he covered state and presidential politics, education, labor, and the city of Compton. Previously, he covered the Justice Department for The Wall Street Journal. He began his career in 1994 as&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/people/joe_mathews&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/371">Senior Fellows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Operations</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6856 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Our Senate Problem</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/our_senate_problem_6808</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The most troublesome task of a reform President,&amp;quot; wrote Henry Adams, is &amp;quot;bringing the Senate back to decency.&amp;quot; Adams was writing about the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant, which began with an Obamaesque promise of national reconciliation and reform but was dragged into scandal by the senatorial kleptocrats of the day.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Senate has changed since then -- its members are elected now, though no less likely to be millionaires -- but it&#039;s still true that the Senate is where ambitious presidencies die. Dozens of subtle explanations are offered for the early failures of the Clinton administration -- from the early&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/our_senate_problem_6808&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6808 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Tuesday Won&#039;t be So Super</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/why_tuesday_wont_be_so_super_6660</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With Super Duper Tuesday looming on Feb. 5, the presidential horse race is about to move into its mid-game. At the end of this process, we may end up with the first president in history who is a woman, or an African American, or a former prisoner of war, or a Mormon or an ordained Southern Baptist minister. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Beyond the headlines and election results, when you lift up the hood of our nation&#039;s nominating process, you see a pretty gnarly sight. There&#039;s nothing simple or easy to understand about it, in fact it has evolved into a complex, chaotic snarl&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/why_tuesday_wont_be_so_super_6660&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/577">Washingtonpost.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6660 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steven Hill in Newsday | Will Candidates Falter Without Independents?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steven_hill_newsday_without_independents_will_mccain_obama_falter</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a style=&quot;color: blue&quot; href=&quot;http://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-liindy0129,0,1629327.story&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Without independents, will McCain, Obama falter? (Newsday)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Certainly, closed primaries are better for those who have a stronger
following among party faithful,&amp;quot; said Steven Hill, the director of the
political reform program for the nonpartisan New America Foundation.
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/63">Newsday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6620 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to Make Primaries Balanced, More Relevant</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/there_must_be_better_way_6577</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the aftermath of Iowa and New Hampshire, many Americans have begun to question the nominating process itself. Are two tiny rural states really the place to kick off an all-important national selection process?

According to a survey conducted for the Associated Press and Yahoo News, fewer than 1 in 5 voters favors Iowa and New Hampshire&#039;s &amp;quot;favored state&amp;quot; status, and nearly 80 percent would rather see other states get their chance at the front of the line.

Officials in those other states fear that if they hold their presidential primary too late in the season, the nominations&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/there_must_be_better_way_6577&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/274">San Francisco Chronicle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/electoral_reform">Electoral Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6577 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
