<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Orange County Register</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/876</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Annette Nellen in Orange County Register | California Lawmakers Want to Tax Downloads</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/annette_nellen_orange_county_register_california_lawmakers_want_tax_downloads</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/homepage/abox/article_1999326.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;California Lawmakers Want to Tax Downloads (&lt;em&gt;Orange County Register&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Democrats would revise the definition of what&#039;s taxable instead of proposing a new tax that requires GOP support. . . 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So what do you think will happen with downloads?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;You&#039;re just going to have a bigger use tax problem,&amp;quot; admits &lt;strong&gt;Annette Nellen&lt;/strong&gt;, a San Jose State tax professor who nonetheless supports taxing downloads.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nellen likes the tax, in part, because increasing revenues isn&#039;t her biggest concern – rationale tax policy is. A fellow at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, Nellen has been urging the state to broaden its sales tax because she says a &amp;quot;consumption tax&amp;quot; should tax all the things we consume – goods and services, products and downloads.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Our tax base hasn&#039;t kept up with how we do business and how we live,&amp;quot; she said, and that means state revenues will naturally dwindle unless something is done.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The way we consume things have changed, but we still have a 1930s tax base,&amp;quot; she said. . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/876">The Orange County Register</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6927 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New America&#039;s Health Policy Report in the Orange County Register</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/new_americas_health_policy_report_in_the_oc_register</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger seemed Monday to want it both ways: fix the problem of California&amp;#39;s 6 million uninsured without raising taxes, or maybe fix the problem by raising taxes...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t believe in including taxes here because people are right now being punished with the hidden tax,&amp;quot; the &lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt; quoted Gov. Schwarzenegger, responding to questions at a Los Angeles-area event. He was alluding to how uninsured health care costs are shifted to people paying insurance premiums.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yet the governor also didn&amp;#39;t seem to absolutely rule out new taxes – if the taxes are suggested by the Democrat-controlled Legislature. According to the Sacramento Bee, when asked whether he would approve a solution that includes a tax increase, the Republican governor said, &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m not telling you now what I would or would not consider...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gov. Schwarzenegger touted a new study Monday showing the average family pays a $1,186 &amp;quot;hidden tax&amp;quot; in inflated insurance premiums to subsidize health care for the uninsured. If the governor was signaling that &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/a_premium_price&quot;&gt;the study&lt;/a&gt; by the Washington, D.C.-based &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/span&gt; is one he is taking his cues from, Californians should be wary. One of the authors concluded: &amp;quot;It would be better to have a universal health care system where everyone gets coverage that is more affordable.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Universal health care. Now, that&amp;#39;s a balloon worth popping. Even the governor vetoed a mandatory, government-ordained universal health care program in September. In his own words at the time, &amp;quot;Socialized medicine is not the solution to our state&amp;#39;s health care problems. This bill would require an extraordinary redirection of public and private funding by creating a vast new bureaucracy to take over health insurance and medical care for Californians – a serious and expensive mistake...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please visit &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/opinion/homepage/article_1387680.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Orange County Register&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;website. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/876">The Orange County Register</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/20">Health Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4563 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
