<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Haaretz</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>An Alternative to Paralysis</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/alternative_paralysis_8114</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If Tzipi Livni becomes Israel&#039;s next
prime minister, she will bring to that office a belief in the urgency of
reaching an extensive, two-state solution with the Palestinians. This in itself
distinguishes Livni from her two main rivals. Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu
disputes the very framework of two viable, independent states, while Labor
leader Ehud Barak parts ways on how pressing the need is to get there. 

Livni will inherit the Annapolis
peace process -- and that is where her problems begin. Annapolis is constructed on a flawed logical
edifice; it is broken. But because Livni is heavily invested in these latest
peace talks, she may&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/alternative_paralysis_8114&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/israel">Israel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8114 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There Are Better Options</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/there_are_better_options_7790</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Israel&#039;s
response to the Iranian challenge has been out of synch with developing
realities for some time. Recently though, it has become dangerously
counter-productive, anchored as it is in denial. As Israel intensifies its role as
threatener-in-chief, and clings to a &amp;quot;more sticks, bigger sticks&amp;quot;
line, events all around are moving on. 

The supposed logic behind Israel&#039;s escalating threats,
suggesting it is ready to go it alone militarily, is threefold. It pressures Iran, thereby
increasing international leverage in negotiations; a nervous world feels
compelled to up sanctions and deliver results; and the path is smoothed to international
acceptance of possible future Israeli action.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/there_are_better_options_7790&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iran">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/israel">Israel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7790 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Removing the Zionist Straitjacket </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/removing_zionist_straitjacket_7229</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Earlier this month Prof. Shlomo Avineri argued on these pages that the real Palestinian Nakba (catastrophe) did not occur at the hands of Israel in 1948, or even after 1967, but rather was a result of &amp;quot;the inability of the Palestinian national movement to create the political and social institutional framework that is the necessary foundation for nation-building.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Avineri&#039;s piece (&amp;quot;The real Nakba,&amp;quot; May 9) is important: It recognizes the reality of Palestinian national consciousness and the legitimacy of their claim to statehood. He should be praised for correcting the tendency to depict the Palestinians as history&#039;s victims, thereby ignoring their&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/removing_zionist_straitjacket_7229&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7229 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;A More Private Occupation&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/more_private_occupation_7005</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Imagine Philippe Starck and Daniel Libeskind are commissioned to design an Israeli checkpoint in the West Bank -- imposing exterior, breezy interior, daring splashes of light and color. Sometimes it seems this is the image being promoted by the newly privatized and civilianized checkpoints and crossings popping up in the territories. When it comes to dress codes, the drab olive of military fatigues is decidedly passe, having been replaced by the crisp uniforms of private security contractors.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A half-dozen such terminals are operated by private companies -- from Al-Jalama near Jenin, to Sha&#039;ar Ephraim near Tul Karm, from Reihan to Tarqumiya.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/more_private_occupation_7005&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7005 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reconstituting Rice </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/reconstituting_rice_6881</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Why have two of Washington&#039;s more noted journalists, The New York Times&#039; Elizabeth Bumiller, and Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post, both come out with books about Condoleezza Rice in recent months? Certainly her story is a unique and appealing one: Rice may be both the second woman and second African-American to fill the position of secretary of state, but she is very much the first person to be both. Unusually for a Bushie, she maintains high approval ratings, and she may have a political future. And she certainly cuts a more human figure than her colleagues. But the real&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/reconstituting_rice_6881&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6881 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>American Strategy Program&#039;s Middle East Initiative Featured in Haaretz</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/american_strategy_program_letter_featured_haaretz</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In its latest issue, dated November 8, The New York Review of Books published in a prominent - if not screaming - manner &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20750&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a letter signed by eight famous individuals and addressed to United States President George W. Bush&lt;/a&gt;, warning him of the grave dangers inherent in a possible failure of the Annapolis conference. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To avert this danger, the signatories suggest adopting a number of recommendations that will distance both the conference and Washington&amp;#39;s policy from the widespread view that prevails today, albeit with slight variations, in the Bush administration and the government of Israel . The signatories include Zbigniew Brzezinski, the national security advisor in the administration of former president Jimmy Carter; Lee Hamilton, the former chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee; Brent Scowcroft, the national security advisor of former president George H. Bush; and Thomas Pickering, the former U.S. ambassador to Israel. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors see the Annapolis conference as &amp;quot;a genuine opportunity for progress toward a two-state solution.&amp;quot; They believe that the Middle East is in the throws of an extremely grave crisis and that a conference with a positive outcome will play a crucial role in stemming instability and violence. They also hold that the conference must deal with &amp;quot;the substance of a permanent peace&amp;quot; and that it should adopt the outlines of a permanent status agreement, especially in light of the impossibility of reaching a comprehensive agreement before the end of November. If Israelis and Palestinians do not manage to reach such an agreement, the Middle East Quartet (made up of the U.S., Russia, the EU and the UN) will have to propose a formulation of its own for an agreement that will be based on UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, the Clinton parameters of 2000, the Arab peace initiative of 2002 and the 2003 road map. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main points of a comprehensive agreement are the partition into two states on the basis of the June 4, 1967 lines, with additional territorial exchanges at a ratio of one to one; Jerusalem as the capital of both states; a solution to the Palestinian refugee problem in a manner concordant with the principle of two states, alongside addressing the profound sense of injustice among the refugees and their compensation and rehabilitation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The signatories congratulate the Bush administration for inviting Syria to the conference but believe that the U.S. government itself should also enter into negotiations with Damascus, based on the belief that a breakthrough in this channel could change the regional situation. As for Hamas, it is preferable to hold a dialogue with it than to attempt to isolate it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The recommendations that appear in &amp;quot;the letter of the eight&amp;quot; and the basic assumptions on which it rests are not surprising. Its initiators have been disagreeing with the Bush administration&amp;#39;s Middle East policy for years now. The letter is presented as a joint initiative of the U.S./Middle East Project, Inc. headed by General Brent Scowcroft and Henry Siegman and the International Crisis Group headed by Gareth Evans, along with the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation/American Strategy Program&lt;/strong&gt;. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/917817.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the Haaretz website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6233 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Best Option</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/best_option_6161</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It may sound counterintuitive, even heretical, but it could just be that Israel is overlooking -- or worse, helping to block -- what is possibly the best option available for avoiding a nuclear Iran. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Direct American-led negotiations are not in play, and Israel is complicit in this omission. The United States looms largest in Iranian threat perceptions and only the U.S. -- not the EU, UN, or the International Atomic Energy Agency -- can deliver a deal for verifiable re-suspension of an Iranian nuclear weapons program. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Jerusalem there is a perhaps understandable tendency to imagine that Tehran has an&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/best_option_6161&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iran">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wmd">WMD</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6161 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wanted: An Israeli School of Realism</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/wanted_israeli_school_realism_5605</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking at the Sharm summit this week, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert seemed to hit all the right notes -- empathy, generosity, a passion for peace. It was a nice speech, lacking only one thing: relevance to the regional strategic environment. This absence of a realist policy outlook is hardly unique to Mr. Olmert. Much of the left still clings to the &amp;quot;heap everything on Abbas’ shoulders&amp;quot; approach that is at least two years past its sell-by date, while more and more of the right is flirting with a &amp;quot;give some of the West Bank to Jordan&amp;quot; idea that was buried&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/wanted_israeli_school_realism_5605&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5605 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Time to Change the Tune</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/time_to_change_the_tune_5052</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the character of the U.S. secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, recently appeared on the popular Israel TV comedy show Eretz nehederet (A Wonderful Country), she was depicted singing Aretha Franklin’s famous anthem &amp;quot;Respect.&amp;quot; As Rice arrives in Israel this weekend for her seventh visit in eight months, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert would be well advised to show her just a little bit more respect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The secretary of state’s discovery of Middle East shuttle diplomacy is not about treading water, or showing &amp;quot;our Arab friends that America cares about the Palestinians.&amp;quot; No, Rice is on a mission -- to create a&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/time_to_change_the_tune_5052&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5052 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ending the Neoconservative Nightmare</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/ending_the_neoconservative_nightmare</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Witnessing the near-perfect symmetry of Israeli and American policy has been one of the more noteworthy aspects of the latest Lebanon war. A true friend in the White House. No deescalate and stabilize, honest-broker, diplomatic jaw-jaw from this president. Great. Except that Israel was actually in need of an early exit strategy, had its diplomatic options narrowed by American weakness and marginalization in the region, and found itself ratcheting up aerial and ground operations in ways that largely worked to Hezbollah’s advantage, the Qana tragedy included. The American ladder had gone AWOL. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More worrying, while everyone here can identify an&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/ending_the_neoconservative_nightmare&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/697">Haaretz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3819 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
