<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Spectrum Policy Task Force</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/spectrum_policy_task_force</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>RCR Wireless News Quotes J.H. Snider on Secrecy, Delays in Spectrum Policy Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/rcr_wireless_news_quotes_j_h_snider_on_secrecy_delays_in_spectrum_policy_reform</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Nearly two years after President Bush authorized the creation of an advisory committee as part of spectrum policy initiative launched in 2003, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration has yet to disclose identities of members, whether any meetings have been held or explain what progress has been made on White House-driven spectrum program that from the beginning has been shrouded in secrecy and yielded few tangible results to date....&lt;/p&gt;One think-tank scholar said NTIA&amp;#39;s handling of the advisory committee is symptomatic of a broader spectrum management issue and raises questions about the Bush administration&amp;#39;s commitment to take on tough spectrum reform challenges.&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The delays and secrecy associated with setting up the advisory panel are indicative of a much larger problem of delay and secrecy in bringing accountability to federal use of spectrum,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;J.H. Snider&lt;/strong&gt;, research director of the New America Foundation&amp;#39;s Wireless Future Program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Snider was a candidate for the advisory panel, but apparently was passed over.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The administration and much of industry knows there is serious mismanagement of federal spectrum. But the administration faces a dilemma,&amp;quot; said Snider. &amp;quot;On the one hand, it wants to avoid political heat by saying it is doing something about the problem. On the other hand, it doesn&amp;#39;t have the political stomach to seriously address it. A primary purpose of the advisory committee is to give the administration political cover for claiming it takes the mismanagement problem seriously. The delays and secrecy are indicative of just how ambivalent the administration is about having the advisory committee seriously grapple with the issues necessary to fulfill its mission...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please visit the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rcrnews.com/lockland.cms?articleId=51823&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;RCR Wireless News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jh_snider/recent_work">J.H. Snider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/795">RCR Wireless News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/535">Spectrum Policy Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/23">Wireless Future Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/spectrum_policy_task_force">Spectrum Policy Task Force</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/unlicensed_spectrum">Unlicensed Spectrum</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4202 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
