<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Go For the Bitter Bloc</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/go_bitter_bloc_7094</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last week&#039;s Pennsylvania primary demonstrated that Barack Obama is not unbeatable. This might sound a strange way to put it. Hasn&#039;t it always been true that Obama is beatable?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Well, consider an alternate reality in which Obama had won Pennsylvania. His people certainly thought long and deeply about this alternate reality -- why else spend a staggering $12 million on one state&#039;s primary? Hillary Clinton would have dropped out. Obama would have shown that he can win white working-class votes in a big, diverse, populous state. Way back after the Iowa caucuses, he playfully observed that everywhere he goes becomes Obama&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2009/go_bitter_bloc_7094&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reihan_salam/recent_work">Reihan Salam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/45">The Weekly Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/minorities">Minorities</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_integration">Social Integration</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7094 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Towards Fiscal Responsibility</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/towards_fiscal_responsibility</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
05/20/2008 - 9:00am&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In spite of large and growing budget deficits, a national debt increasingly funded by foreign investors, an aging population, and rapidly rising health care costs -- which together have left the United States on an unsustainable fiscal path -- the presidential campaigns are not yet focused on these critical issues.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On May 20, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget will launch &lt;strong&gt;U.S. Budget Watch&lt;/strong&gt;, a new project to increase awareness of these issues.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This kick-off event will feature a remarkable bipartisan gathering of many of the nation’s preeminent budget experts where they will release &lt;strong&gt;U.S. Budget Watch&lt;/strong&gt;’s 12-Step Program for Fiscal Responsibility. Please join us for this breakfast meeting and a rich discussion of the issues and the campaign.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/16">Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7145 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Winning Over the Values Voters</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/winning_over_values_voters_7098</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In Barack Obama&#039;s now famous remarks to rich donors in San Francisco in early April, he attributed the fact that white Democrats in small towns were resisting his candidacy to their anger over their economic misfortune. &amp;quot;They get bitter,&amp;quot; Obama said, &amp;quot;and cling to guns or religion... as a way to explain their frustration.&amp;quot; Obama seemed to be implying that social conservatism is a toxic byproduct of economic distress -- and it may have hurt him in Pennsylvania last week, where he lost the primary contest to Hillary Clinton.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yet the notion expressed by Obama is hardly new. Way back in&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/winning_over_values_voters_7098&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/96">Newsweek</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7098 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dialogue Isn&#039;t the Last Word</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/dialogue_isnt_last_word_7112</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Barack Obama loves reconciliation, but it isn&#039;t all it&#039;s cracked up to be. Sometimes it isn&#039;t even possible, and let&#039;s be honest, it isn&#039;t always the point.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
About six weeks ago, during his &amp;quot;More Perfect Union&amp;quot; speech on race that some heralded as the second coming of Abraham Lincoln, Obama had a choice between reconciliation and renunciation, and, true to form, he chose the former. He protested that he could &amp;quot;no more disown&amp;quot; the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. than he could disown &amp;quot;the black community&amp;quot; or his own (sometimes politically incorrect) white grandmother. Really?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Right about now, his much-heralded tutorial on&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/dialogue_isnt_last_word_7112&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/gregory_rodriguez/recent_work">Gregory Rodriguez</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_integration">Social Integration</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:19:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7112 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Schwarzenegger-Shriver: Protecting the Brand</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/schwarzenegger_shriver_protecting_brand_7121</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One afternoon early in his second year as governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger flew home from Sacramento to Los Angeles with a vexing political problem. He needed to cut $2 billion from the budget he was putting together, and any of his best options for doing it could get him into trouble.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If he raised taxes, he&#039;d anger his fellow Republicans. Break a promise to increase education funding and he&#039;d alienate the top Democratic interest group, the California Teachers Assn. Option 3: Cut health and human services, the next biggest category in the budget. He didn&#039;t like the idea, but some of his&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/schwarzenegger_shriver_protecting_brand_7121&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/248">Los Angeles Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7121 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maverick Or Maneuverer?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/maverick_or_maneuverer_7070</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ever since &amp;quot;authenticity&amp;quot; became the quality we most value in our politicians, its converse, &amp;quot;hypocrisy,&amp;quot; has been the political vice of which we are most conscious. Thus, those who have noticed that Sen. John McCain enjoys a reputation as a &amp;quot;maverick&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;stands up to special interests&amp;quot; while leading a campaign that is operated and funded entirely by lobbyists have seen this as a contradiction. Is McCain a hypocrite, or perhaps a divided soul, with the angelic maverick voice of reform perched on one shoulder and a diabolical little influence-peddler on the other? Who, journalists ask, is the real John&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/maverick_or_maneuverer_7070&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/campaign_finance">Campaign Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7070 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are You Confused Yet?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/are_you_confused_yet_7087</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Polls show that health care ranks near the top of voters’ concerns, especially among Democrats. And for those who say “the economy” is the top issue, health care is usually a major part of their financial worries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And yet, voters must be awfully confused about where the Democrats stand on health care. On the one hand, both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton say they want to insure everyone -- and in much the same way. On the other hand, they are beating each other up at every turn. Before the Pennsylvania primary, Mr. Obama ran yet another ad arguing&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/are_you_confused_yet_7087&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7087 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Rocky&#039;s State, a Legislator Can Still Outpunch an Orator</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/rockys_state_legislator_can_still_outpunch_orator_7068</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The razor-thin margin separating the contenders for the Democratic nomination grew even thinner at the weekend. Why is this battle so close? A simple reason is that, despite the occasional invective, Americans genuinely admire both the charismatic Barack Obama and the fiercely resilient Hillary Clinton. When John McCain is thrown into the mix, we have the greatest reality show ever, an epic clash of survivalists. It is a shame Sergio Leone is not here to direct the final scene. But the general election is not until November. For now, it comes down to the Democratic nomination, and that prize will&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/rockys_state_legislator_can_still_outpunch_orator_7068&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ted_widmer/recent_work">Ted Widmer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/180">The Guardian (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7068 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Joe Lunch Bucket Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/joe_lunch_bucket_strategy_7062</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If Americans are such huge fans of big dreams and high rolling, self-made tycoons and upward mobility, why then do we insist on seeing our national political elites -- who are also generally our economic and educational elites -- throw back a shot of whiskey or lace up bowling shoes?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Why do we need to pretend that high-flying politicians who graduated from the fanciest schools and dine at the toniest restaurants really don&#039;t live in a different world and -- dare I say it -- class than the rest of us?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The easy answer is that we want to identify with them,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/joe_lunch_bucket_strategy_7062&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/gregory_rodriguez/recent_work">Gregory Rodriguez</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_opinion">Public Opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7062 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clinton Has Strategic Blind Spot On China</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/clinton_has_strategic_blind_spot_china_7047</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A similar version of this article also appears on The New Republic, which features a debate between Steven Clemons and Richard Just, TNR&#039;s deputy editor, on the appropriate response to the Beijing Olympics.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
China&#039;s Olympics are an enticing target for &amp;quot;cause crusaders&amp;quot; who want to taunt the regime with public relations stunts while the global spotlight and attention of billions are watching every countermove China&#039;s leaders make. The &amp;quot;norms&amp;quot; of any state are not really evident unless observed after that state responds to shocks. Cause crusaders are doing their best to exploit the moment to throw&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/clinton_has_strategic_blind_spot_china_7047&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/105">The Daily Yomiuri (Tokyo)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7047 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
