<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Capitol Weekly</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/599</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How to Revive Redistricting Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/how_revive_redistricting_reform_6185</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the movie Groundhog Day, the Bill Murray character, a weatherman who is doomed to repeat the same day over and over, asks a question that haunts redistricting reformers in California: &amp;quot;What would you do if you were stuck in one place and everyday was exactly the same, and nothing that you did mattered?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the recent failure of the Legislature to place redistricting reform on the ballot -- for the second year in a row -- reformers are scrambling for a way forward. One way would be to spend millions of dollars to gather signatures on a voter initiative. But&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/how_revive_redistricting_reform_6185&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/599">The Capitol Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/34">Citizens Assembly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6185 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Kids&#039; Accounts Warrant Debate</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/kids_accounts_warrant_debate_5046</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Governor Schwarzenegger was cheered when he recently talked about post-partisanship in Washington, D.C. But the post-partisan waters don’t run deep back home in California. Two state senators who just crossed the aisle to forward a creative solution to a pressing problem are getting more grief than glory. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senator Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and Robert Dutton, R-Rancho Cucamonga, held a press conference on February 28 to introduce their bill to create a California Kids Account for every newborn. The goal is to encourage parents to start saving early for their children’s future and, in the process, build the whole family’s financial know-how.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/kids_accounts_warrant_debate_5046&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anne_stuhldreher/recent_work">Anne Stuhldreher</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/599">The Capitol Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/31">ASPIRE Act/KIDS Accounts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5046 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>National Direct Election of the President is Good for California</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/national_direct_election_of_the_president_is_good_for_california</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has sitting on his desk a bill that he ought to sign. Signing AB 2948 would establish California as a national leader in the effort to create a nationwide popular vote for president, which recent elections have shown would be a more democratic method than the 18th Century Electoral College. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, AB 2948 has become bogged down in the usual divisive partisan sand-box squabbling that afflicts our national politics. Democratic legislators voted to pass this bill with near unanimity, while Republican legislators treated this legislative bill as if it is radioactive. Perhaps the Republican view opposing changes&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/national_direct_election_of_the_president_is_good_for_california&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/599">The Capitol Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4136 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California Should Improve Awareness of EITC Refund</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/california_should_improve_awareness_of_eitc_refund</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New research reveals that California is dead last in bringing home the country&amp;#39;s largest resource for working-poor families. By April 17, hundreds of thousands of Californians will miss out on applying for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), a source of sizeable refunds that give a financial boost to those at the low end of the pay scale. Golden State residents leave almost $1 billion in federal funds unapplied for. California families pay a big price when they leave these dollars sitting in Washington, D.C. People who earn up to $37,263 can claim EITC refunds that average $1700, but can&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/california_should_improve_awareness_of_eitc_refund&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anne_stuhldreher/recent_work">Anne Stuhldreher</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/599">The Capitol Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/583">California Asset Building</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/poverty">Poverty</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2882 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
