<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The New Republic</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Unraveling</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/unraveling_7221</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Within a few minutes of Noman Benotman&#039;s
arrival at the Kandahar guest house, Osama bin Laden came to welcome
him. The journey from Kabul had been hard, 17 hours in a Toyota pickup
truck bumping along what passed as the main highway to southern
Afghanistan. It was the summer of 2000, and Benotman, then a leader of
a group trying to overthrow the Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi, had
been invited by bin Laden to a conference of jihadists from around the
Arab world, the first of its kind since Al Qaeda had moved to
Afghanistan in 1996. Benotman, the scion of an aristocratic family
marginalized by Qaddafi, had known&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/unraveling_7221&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_bergen/recent_work">Peter Bergen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7221 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mark Schmitt in the New Republic | &#039;McCain&#039;s cynicism&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/mark_schmitt_new_republic_mccains_cynicism</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
...Apropos my question about McCain&#039;s cynicism, &lt;strong&gt;Mark Schmitt &lt;/strong&gt;has an interesting piece in &lt;em&gt;The American Prospect&lt;/em&gt; arguing that conservatism has been so discredited that McCain&#039;s only hope of winning will be a kind of right-wing identity politics that pits &amp;quot;Americans&amp;quot; versus &amp;quot;others,&amp;quot; with Obama playing the role of chief &amp;quot;other...&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/archive/2008/05/29/mccain-s-cynicism-cont-d.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7361 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We Have To Clean Up Bush&#039;s Messes Before We Can Focus On China</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/we_have_clean_bushs_messes_we_can_focus_china_7032</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This article is the third part of a TNR debate between Steven Clemons and 
Richard Just, deputy editor from The New Republic, on the appropriate 
response to the Beijing Olympics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

Please click here for the first part of the debate. For the second part, please click here. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From: Steven Clemons
To: Richard Just 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Richard reads me pretty well. I don&#039;t believe that the U.S. government should throw its weight behind an Olympics-tethered human rights rebuke of China -- not because I feel that advocating for human rights is wrong, but because the approach Hillary Clinton is advocating will&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/we_have_clean_bushs_messes_we_can_focus_china_7032&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/human_rights">Human Rights</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7032 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Hillary&#039;s Olympics Stance Is Immature</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/why_hillarys_olympics_stance_immature_7017</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This article is the first part of a TNR debate between Steven Clemons and Richard Just, deputy editor from The New Republic, on the appropriate response to the Beijing Olympics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From: Steven Clemons

To: Richard Just 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hillary Clinton recently called on George W. Bush to boycott the Beijing Olympic opening ceremonies, and I think she&#039;s showing a strategic blind spot that is worrisome.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To add a bit of context, last October, The New Republic&#039;s editors ran a thought-provoking editorial, &amp;quot;Gold Meddle,&amp;quot; that struggled with the moral dilemma of sending America&#039;s Olympians to compete in a country that still jailed and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/why_hillarys_olympics_stance_immature_7017&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7017 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Persian Pragmatists</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/persian_pragmatists_6937</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Iran&#039;s recent parliamentary elections, conducted on Friday, stuck closely to a script familiar from the past four years: Conservatives predictably won the majority of seats from a ballot cleansed of reformists by the Guardians Council; turnout in cosmopolitan Tehran was lower than the provinces; and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei blasted the U.S. for interfering in Iran&#039;s elections. The election&#039;s only clear winner -- as usual, in this script -- is Khamenei, whose virtual veto power over all matters of state, combined with a conservative ascendancy, grants him a political shield that will be difficult to penetrate.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But this year&#039;s script&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/persian_pragmatists_6937&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/afshin_molavi/recent_work">Afshin Molavi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iran">Iran</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6937 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A More Perfect Soundbite</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/more_perfect_soundbite_6939</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Barack Obama&#039;s speech acquired a title nearly as soon as it was delivered. On both the campaign website and YouTube, where it has been seen more than two million times, it was identified as &amp;quot;A More Perfect Union.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The four words refer, of course, to the preamble to the Constitution, which was appropriate both as a gesture to Obama&#039;s hosts (Philadelphia&#039;s National Constitution Center, conveniently located in Pennsylvania) and as a reflection on our very imperfect society. It is a strange phrasing -- grammatically impossible, as some high school English teacher is doubtless pointing out somewhere, because nothing perfect can be&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/more_perfect_soundbite_6939&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ted_widmer/recent_work">Ted Widmer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6939 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Killer Question</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/killer_question_6587</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The last time I saw Benazir Bhutto was over dinner at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., three weeks before her October return to Pakistan. She was in enormously good spirits, almost effervescent. The years in the political wilderness looked like they were coming to an end. But, at one point, the conversation took a more serious turn as she began discussing the mysterious death of General Zia, the dictator who had hanged her father in 1979. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Zia died in a plane accident in Pakistan nine years later. What was especially strange about the crash was that there was no&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/killer_question_6587&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_bergen/recent_work">Peter Bergen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6587 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Steve Clemons in The New Republic | U.S. Foreign Policy with Cuba</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/steve_clemons_new_republic_american_foreign_policy_cuba</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a style=&quot;color: blue&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=9eee0dd7-e573-4e2f-850a-c153eb84198e&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
The Failed Policy That Won&#039;t Die (&lt;em&gt;The New Republic&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And as Steve Clemons &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehavananote.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;, Mike Huckabee, who backed
greater engagement with Cuba
when he was governor of Arkansas, now says he
wants to put more pressure on Havana
than the Bush administration did. ...
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/cuba">Cuba</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6530 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Len Nichols in The New Republic on Individual Mandates</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/len_nichols_new_republic_individual_mandates</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The New Republic Columnist Johnathan Cohn wrote about the presidential candidates&amp;#39; health care proposals, and explored a point made by Health Policy Director Len Nichols--individual mandate is necessary for achieving universal health coverage. An excerpt from Cohn&amp;#39;s Column is below:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The logic of a mandate begins with understanding exactly why Obama&amp;#39;s essential diagnosis of the problem--that it&amp;#39;s all about affordability--is wrong. It&amp;#39;s certainly true that cost is the single biggest reason 45 million Americans don&amp;#39;t have health insurance today. That is why all three Democrats have proposed adopting the same set of strategies to make insurance more affordable: Requiring insurers to sell to everybody, at the same price, regardless of medical condition; creating a public program into which anybody can enroll; cutting down on wasteful treatments that drive up the price of medicine unnecessarily; and offering financial assistance to those people who might still need help paying for coverage. Make those changes--in other words, make insurance affordable--and most of the uninsured will leap at the chance to get coverage. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s not the theory of mandates so much as the practice of them that worries other critics. This is usually the place where car insurance enters the discussion. Most states require that drivers carry liability insurance. But, in some states, more than a third of all drivers don&amp;#39;t have coverage. (If you&amp;#39;ve ever had an accident with an uninsured motorist, you&amp;#39;ve learned this the hard way.) If Americans aren&amp;#39;t complying with requirements to buy car insurance, the argument goes, why would they comply requirements to buy health insurance? ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;strong&gt;Jonathan Gruber&lt;/strong&gt;, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist, it&amp;#39;s impossible to peg the likely impact of a mandate with even the very rough degree of precision he and other economists use for other estimates, simply because it requires making even more assumptions. But he also stressed that the question isn&amp;#39;t whether a mandate will make a difference--it&amp;#39;s how much of a difference and how close to full, 100 percent coverage an individual mandate system would get. Nor is Gruber alone in this assessment: It&amp;#39;s pretty much conventional wisdom among policy makers. Just yesterday, the Wharton School&amp;#39;s Mark Pauly--another highly regarded health economist, but one who tends to embrace more conservative views--co-signed a letter with Gruber and the New America Foundation&amp;#39;s &lt;strong&gt;Len Nichols&lt;/strong&gt; affirming that an individual mandate is essential for achieving universal coverage. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The complete &lt;em&gt;The New Republic&lt;/em&gt; article can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=b5be7883-461b-453b-99b5-d1df748d242d&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. For additional reading on individual mandates, check out &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/health_debate_reality_check_role_individual_requirements&quot; title=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/health_debate_reality_check_role_individual_requirements&quot;&gt;“Health Debate Reality Check: The Role of Individual Requirements,”&lt;/a&gt; a policy brief explaining the value of an individual mandate when seeking a system of coverage for all Americans. Also, in a &lt;a href=&quot;/files/naf120607b-call.mp3&quot; title=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/files/naf120607b-call.mp3&quot;&gt;teleconference&lt;/a&gt; last week, the brief&amp;#39;s authors--&lt;strong&gt;Mark Pauly &lt;/strong&gt;of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, &lt;strong&gt;Jonathan Gruber&lt;/strong&gt; of M.I.T., and &lt;strong&gt;Len Nichols&lt;/strong&gt;, Director of the Health Policy Program at the New America Foundation--discussed their reasons for supporting an individual requirement to purchase health insurance, and answered questions about the feasibility of enforcing a mandate.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/len_nichols/recent_work">Len Nichols</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/20">Health Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:38:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6415 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>War of Error</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/war_error_6154</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Omar bin Laden, the fourth son of the Al Qaeda leader, cuts a striking figure. In one photo, he stares out from beneath an Adidas baseball cap, his beard closely trimmed -- an entirely different look from his father’s seventh-century aesthetic. He wears jeans and sits next to his much older wife, a pale-faced British woman with pig tails, whom he divorced a mere five months into their marriage. While his father would not approve of his lifestyle choices, few men know the terrorist mastermind so well. When the Sudanese government exiled bin Laden in 1996, Omar was part of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/war_error_6154&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_bergen/recent_work">Peter Bergen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6154 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
