<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>openDemocracy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/317</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The U.S. Foreign-Policy Future: A Progressive-Realist Union? </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/u_s_foreign_policy_future_progressive_realist_union_5977</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During the George W Bush years, two great currents of thinking about United States foreign policy -- progressive and realist -- have shared a critique of a third -- neo-conservative. Both liberal internationalists and proponents of hard-nosed Realpolitik have rejected a US foreign policy that aims to achieve indefinite US global hegemony -- but from quite different perspectives. Indeed, most realists have been as contemptuous of the liberal-internationalist alternative as of neo-conservatism. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently, some thoughtful observers of foreign policy have proposed that progressives and realists move beyond a shared critique of neo-conservatism in the direction of a commonly-held philosophy. Robert&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/u_s_foreign_policy_future_progressive_realist_union_5977&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/317">openDemocracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5977 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democratic Failure: Festering Lilies Smell Worse Than Weeds</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/democratic_failure_festering_lilies_smell_worse_than_weeds</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have to endorse most of what John Dunn argues in his response to Anthony Barnett &amp; Isabel Hilton&#039;s article &quot;Democracy and openDemocracy.&quot;
Barnett &amp; Hilton express a set of noble aspirations about democracy and its spread in the world with which I am wholly in agreement. I honour their intent. And indeed, it is the duty of everyone to work towards the kind of world they describe: one of an &quot;open-minded, democratic citizenship&quot; capable of &quot;empowering the powerless and checking the powerful.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We shall do so much more effectively, however, if we do not suffer from too many illusions&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/democratic_failure_festering_lilies_smell_worse_than_weeds&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/317">openDemocracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2024 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An Islamic Republic? Yes or No</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/an_islamic_republic_yes_or_no</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bearded thug clenched a heavy wooden stick, occasionally waving it in the air as he surveyed a small group of protesters. It was 2003 and the assembled crowd -- a mix of university students, middle-class professionals, and disaffected, unemployed young men -- had gathered to commemorate the fourth anniversary of Iran&#039;s 1999 student protests, the most dramatic eruption of open dissent in the history of the Islamic Republic of Iran.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The student revolt of summer 1999, which began with protests over the closure of a reformist daily and ended in six days of pitched street-battles between a cocktail of Iranian&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/an_islamic_republic_yes_or_no&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/afshin_molavi/recent_work">Afshin Molavi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/317">openDemocracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2512 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
