<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>New Scientist</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/299</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Shannon Brownlee in New Scientist | &#039;Condition Critical: The Medical Crisis Facing America&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/shannon_brownlee_new_scientist_condition_critical_medical_crisis_facing_america</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In their speeches, both candidates stress increased access. McCain favours tax credits to encourage families to get insurance, while Obama proposes mandatory coverage for children, a new public insurance plan and a requirement for employers to provide health benefits for their workers. Yet each will struggle to widen coverage if they cannot control costs. “We need to do both at the same time,”says &lt;strong&gt;Shannon Brownlee&lt;/strong&gt;, a specialist in health policy with the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, a non-partisan think tankin Washington DC. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/mg19926744.700-condition-critical-the-medical-crisis-facing-america.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK (subscription required)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/shannon_brownlee/recent_work">Shannon Brownlee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/299">New Scientist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/20">Health Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8006 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffrey Lewis in New Scientist | &#039;Iraq Bans Nuclear Tests&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/jeffrey_lewis_new_scientist</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iraq&#039;s move has been welcomed by disarmament experts, though some
question its significance. It&#039;s good but &amp;quot;relatively meaningless&amp;quot; given
the US refusal to ratify, says &lt;strong&gt;Jeffrey Lewis&lt;/strong&gt; from &lt;strong&gt;New America
Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, a think tank based in Washington DC. &amp;quot;This is probably the
only non-proliferation benefit the US got out of the Iraq invasion.&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19926712.800-iraq-bans-nuclear-tests.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jeffrey_lewis/recent_work">Jeffrey Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/299">New Scientist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/961">Nuclear Strategy &amp;amp; Nonproliferation Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7861 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Selling Out</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/selling_out</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elias Zerhouni, director of the US National Institutes of Health, last week took one small step along the road to repairing the tainted ethical reputation of government science. New conflict-of-interest rules that he announced will at last bar NIH scientists from moonlighting as consultants for private industry. The move follows a series of investigations by The Los Angeles Times and the US Congress that uncovered extensive financial ties -- many previously undisclosed -- between agency scientists and the drug and biotech firms that have a financial stake in the outcome of their research.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is reassuring news, but it&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/selling_out&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jennifer_washburn/recent_work">Jennifer Washburn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/299">New Scientist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2319 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
