<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Times (London)</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Bloodshed of Desperation Becomes the Real Threat to Pakistan</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/bloodshed_desperation_becomes_real_threat_pakistan_7951</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The attack on the Marriott hotel is a shocking blow to Pakistan. What
is really frightening is that the security measures in place worked: the lorry
was stopped by guards at the barrier outside. As I found during visits to the
Marriott during my recent stay in Pakistan, they were vigilant and
effective. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Against a tonne of explosives, however, there is not much that can be done –
except to cordon off the entire neighbourhood. Most of the Western embassies
and consulates in Pakistan
are protected in this way, but the Marriott, like other international hotels,
government buildings and media offices, is on a main road that cannot&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/bloodshed_desperation_becomes_real_threat_pakistan_7951&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215">The Times (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7951 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Power Cuts Fuel Pakistan&#039;s Power Struggle</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/power_cuts_fuel_pakistans_power_struggle_7852</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Given all this, one might ask whether it was worth getting rid of Mr
Musharraf. Although he too pursued an alliance with the US, he was at least
personally honest, whereas Mr Zardari is widely known as “Mr Ten Per Cent”,
because of his behaviour when his wife was Prime Minister in the 1990s.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If things go badly, many Pakistanis may come to regret Mr Musharraf&#039;s
overthrow. But it&#039;s no good crying over spilt milk. As I found talking to
ordinary people in the weeks before his resignation, his popularity had sunk
so low that he could have remained in power only through ruthless
repression, which would have&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/power_cuts_fuel_pakistans_power_struggle_7852&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215">The Times (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1268">Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7852 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t Pick a Fight You Can&#039;t Finish, Mr. Miliband</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/dont_pick_fight_you_cant_finish_mr_miliband_7813</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Before making his speech on policy towards Russia
in Kiev, Ukraine, later this week David
Miliband would do well to ponder some wise advice from a great predecessor.
Lord Salisbury, Foreign Secretary and Prime Minister in the days of the British Empire, dispensed immense global power; but that
did not mean that he liked playing about with that power. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Faced with proposals for British policy that he understood to be deeply
damaging to the interests of other great powers, Salisbury would look his colleagues in the
eye and ask simply: “Are you really prepared to fight? If not, do not embark on
this policy.” 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If the events&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/dont_pick_fight_you_cant_finish_mr_miliband_7813&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215">The Times (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/georgia">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7813 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Roots of the Conflict Between Georgia, South Ossetia and Russia</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/roots_conflict_between_georgia_south_ossetia_and_russia_7728</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Many factors are involved in the present conflict but the central one is
straightforward: the majority of the Ossetes living south of the main Caucasus
range in Georgia wish to unite with the Ossetes living to the north, in an
autonomous republic of the Russian Federation; and the Georgians, regarding
South Ossetia as both a legal and an historic part of their national territory,
refuse to accept this. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Twice in the past century, when the empire to the north weakened and Georgia
declared its independence, the southern Ossetes revolted against Georgian rule.
It happened in 1918-20, between the collapse of the Russian empire and the
Soviet Union’s conquest&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/roots_conflict_between_georgia_south_ossetia_and_russia_7728&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215">The Times (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/georgia">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/nato">NATO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7728 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Anatol Lieven on the Blair-Bush Relationship in The Times</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/anatol_lieven_on_the_blair_bush_relationship_in_the_times</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the outset, Kendall Myers appeared determined to explode what he described as the “myth” of the special relationship between Britain and the United States. It had never existed, he said in his opening remarks, “or, at least, not one that we noticed”. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Instead, relations had been “altogether too one-sided” for a very long time. “The poodle factor did not begin with Tony Blair, it began, yes, with Winston Churchill.” &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At this point Dr Myers acknowledged that “as an employee of the State Department” he perhaps ought not to say so much. But analysis is what he does for Condoleezza Rice, he was at an academic forum — speaking at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies in Washington on Tuesday night — and his provocative historical views were gathering an unstoppable momentum...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The other speakers on Tuesday night all agreed that, if there ever had been a special relationship, it would never again be quite as special as it had been during the Bush-Blair era — even though culture, economy and defence would still bind the two nations. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Anatol Lieven&lt;/strong&gt;, a fellow of the New America Foundation, described how British public opinion had moved decisively against America, and not just against Mr Bush...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please visit &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2478592,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; website. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215">The Times (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_opinion">Public Opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4435 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The US Is Up For Grabs and Anyone Could Win It</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/the_us_is_up_for_grabs_and_anyone_could_win_it</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All politics is local, the saying goes. The adage is particularly true in the United States. The attempt to understand next year&#039;s presidential election contest in simple terms of Left versus Right is profoundly misleading. The US is a country with culturally distinct regions bigger than many nation states. The party that wins next year will represent a confederation of regions, not a consistent political ideology.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Consider Howard Dean, the charismatic Vermont Governor who has emerged as front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. According to the media, he is a &quot;liberal&quot;. But Dean is considered liberal chiefly because he opposed the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/the_us_is_up_for_grabs_and_anyone_could_win_it&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/215">The Times (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3460 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
