<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Australian</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett in The Australian | &#039;Nirvana Out of American Reach&#039; </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_australian_nirvana_out_american_reach</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The energy, financial and political woes that grip the US signal a decisive shift in world power, mocking the liberal delusion that Barack Obama or John McCain can return American prestige and power to its pre-Bush year 2000 nirvana. There is no such nirvana. There is instead a new reality: the greatest transfer of income in human history, away from energy importers such as the US to energy exporters; the rise of a new breed of wealthy autocracies that cripple US hopes of dominating the global system; and demands on the US to make fresh compromises in a world where power is rapidly being diversified....
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Flynt Leverett,&lt;/strong&gt; former director of Middle East Affairs on the National
Security Council, says: &amp;quot;The international economic position of the
United States has deteriorated substantially since the new millennium.
The big trends in global finance and energy markets are working against
the US. There isn&#039;t any solving this problem in terms of making it go
away. These are ongoing realities. The energy picture is not going to
change: it is here to stay...&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23968711-7583,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7497 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Tactics at Odds with Contradictory Iraq Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/us_tactics_odds_contradictory_iraq_strategy_5943</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The long-awaited report by David Petraeus to the US Congress on the war in Iraq has provoked a debate about tactics rather than what is needed: a debate about strategy. The tactics are those of the US troop surge (a weasel word for escalation). Observers agree that the surge has had some effect in reducing violence in parts of Iraq, temporarily if not permanently. But this success, if it is a success, ignores the larger question of US strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The US did not invade Iraq to provide it with a police force. The goal is not reducing Iraqi violence as an&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/us_tactics_odds_contradictory_iraq_strategy_5943&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5943 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Return of the Realists</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/return_of_the_realists_4313</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The day after the 2006 US mid-term elections, a polite but important coup is under way in Washington. Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld has gone. Brent Scowcroft acolyte, former CIA director and anti-neo-conservative realist Robert Gates has got Rumsfeld’s job. Democrats control both chambers of Congress. And George W. Bush has found that not only can he not stay the course in Iraq, he can’t stay the course on any policy front.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quite uncharacteristic of his earlier tenure, somewhat desperate-sounding pleas for bipartisanship have become the President’s most often-stated phrase since voters ripped the gear shaft and steering column out of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/return_of_the_realists_4313&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4313 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For Thriving Cities, It&#039;s Not Enough to be Cool</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/for_thriving_cities_its_not_enough_to_be_cool</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The West&amp;#39;s great cities face serious challenges, with terrorists plotting to blow them up even as jobs and capital flee to the low-cost havens of the developing world. However, from Sydney to San Francisco, the political imperative all too often has been not to look for ways to stay safe or competitive, but instead how to make cities cool and hip.  &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;To many public officials, the key to building a great city in the 21st century lies in cultivating the arts and entertainment venues that appeal to a so-called creative class of youngish, hip professionals.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/for_thriving_cities_its_not_enough_to_be_cool&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joel_kotkin/recent_work">Joel Kotkin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/urban_policy">Urban Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3502 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Jury is Still Out on Iraqi Democracy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_jury_is_still_out_on_iraqi_democracy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Happy days are here again. Or so say William Kristol and Robert Kagan, the co-helmsmen of America&#039;s neoconservative establishment. In their upbeat Weekly Standard assessment of the December 15 Iraq parliamentary elections (reprinted in these pages yesterday), they ridicule &quot;sour experts&quot; whom they assert are going far out of their way to explain why &quot;the peaceful election of a national assembly for a fully self-governing Arab democracy was not a turning point.&quot; But the election, according to Kristol and Kaplan, was no less than an &quot;eruption of democracy in the heart of the Arab world.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, another neoconservative fellow&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_jury_is_still_out_on_iraqi_democracy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2826 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Realists Lambaste Neo-Cons</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/realists_lambaste_neo_cons</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brent Scowcroft, one of the pillars of the Republican foreign policy establishment and best friend of George H.W. Bush, has dropped a few tons of highly destructive ordnance on George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice and others on the White House war team. In this week&#039;s New Yorker, the former national security adviser&#039;s usual wry and elliptical style turned to blunt, unmistakable disdain for the policies and &quot;decision-making process&quot; that this Bush administration has deployed. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Scowcroft&#039;s remarks followed an even more incendiary speech at the New America Foundation, a Washington think tank, by former State Department chief of staff&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/realists_lambaste_neo_cons&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2665 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Beware Visionaries Wielding Power</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/beware_visionaries_wielding_power</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the debate about a second UN resolution authorising a US-dominated invasion and occupation of Iraq, both sides share a common premise. France, Russia and Germany argue that the UN will lose its moral authority if it rubber-stamps a war that the US has decided to wage. The Bush administration argues that the UN will lose its geopolitical credibility if it does not. Both sides are mistaken -- the UN has neither authority nor credibility to lose.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UN has never functioned as its founders intended it to do. US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who coined the name and oversaw planning&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/beware_visionaries_wielding_power&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1869 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
