<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Publishers Weekly</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/187</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What Would the Founders Do? Our Questions, Their Answers</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/what_would_the_founders_do_our_questions_their_answers</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What Would the Founders Do? Our Questions, Their Answers &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Richard Brookhiser&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Basic, $25 (256p) ISBN 0-465-00819-4 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Reviewed by Michael Lind &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;It might be thought that nothing new could be said about America&amp;#39;s founding fathers, in the midst of the contemporary avalanche of tomes about Washington, Jefferson and other early American leaders. But Rick Brookhiser, inspired perhaps by a Christian motto-&amp;quot;What Would Jesus Do?&amp;quot; (WWJD)-has come up with a way to describe the views of the architects of the American republic that is as entertaining as it is informative.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Americans have been asking what the founders would&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/what_would_the_founders_do_our_questions_their_answers&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/187">Publishers Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2876 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Power of The Book;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_power_of_the_book</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Religion and politics used to be the two great taboos of polite conversation. Today politics is everywhere, right down to the Fox and CNN ubiquitous at the gym. But religion remains a special case. The mainstream news media--television in particular, which is where many Americans get the bulk of their information--treads lightly when it touches it at all, afraid of giving offense or oversimplifying and reaping the consequences. Talking heads pontificating about Islam as a source of terror is not a discussion of religion. Evangelicals almost never appear on mainstream TV, not even Fox. I can&#039;t think of the last&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_power_of_the_book&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/187">Publishers Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2365 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
