<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>World Policy Journal</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Congress and the &#039;YouTube War&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/congress_and_the_youtube_war_5187</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United States is “fighting a different kind of enemy” in its War on Terror, or so says President Bush. He’s right. For the first time since the days of the Barbary pirates, America is doing active battle not with a rival nation, but with a non-state actor (al Qaeda) that lacks a geographical home, is motivated by ideology more than territorial ambition, and whose victories are defined in non-military terms. It is an enemy that uses communication technology, public opinion, and the global 24-hour news cycle to wage its battles. It is, in a very real sense, the first&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/congress_and_the_youtube_war_5187&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maria_figueroa_kupcu/recent_work">Maria Figueroa Küpçü</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5187 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Goldilocks World Economy?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/a_goldilocks_world_economy_5374</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past decade and half, two developments in the world economy have come together to create conditions for what could be a new era of faster economic growth and rising prosperity. One development involves the integration of China, India and the former Soviet Union into the global economy. The inclusion of these three populous regions into the global economy has created what economists call positive supply-side shocks, resulting in surpluses in labor, capital, and productive capacity. The most obvious impact of China, India, and the former Soviet Union has been on the world&amp;#39;s labor market. Their entry into the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/a_goldilocks_world_economy_5374&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/19">Global Middle Class Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Schwenninger PP.pdf" length="58837" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5374 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Road Not Taken in the Middle East</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_road_not_taken_in_the_middle_east_4381</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Middle East diplomatic Quartet (composed of the United States, the European Union, the Russian Federation, and the Office of the Secretary General of the United Nation) authored and put forward its Road Map to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on April 30, 2003. The Road Map outlined steps to be taken by the parties. It was an ambitious plan that dealt with internal Palestinian security, humanitarian assistance, democratic reform, freedom of movement for Palestinians, Israeli military redeployment, and settlement freeze -- all culminating in a permanent status agreement by end of 2005.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Needless to say, none of the parties lived up&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/the_road_not_taken_in_the_middle_east_4381&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Levy_WJ_fall2006.pdf" length="76049" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4381 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thinking Like a Jihadist</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/thinking_like_a_jihadist</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this year, Muhammad Zaki Amawi and Marwan Othman el-Hindi, Jordanianborn U.S. citizens, and Wassim I. Mazloum, a Lebanese citizen, stood in a federal district court in Ohio, accused of conspiring to wage jihad against U.S. forces in Iraq. According to the indictment against them, Amawi had flown to Jordan last August carrying laptop computers that he intended to donate to the mujahidin in Iraq. Amawi, the indictment stated, had &amp;quot;unsuccessfully attempted to enter Iraq to wage violent jihad, or &amp;quot;holy war,&amp;#39; against the United States and coalition forces&amp;quot;...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The complete article is available below in PDF format. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/nir_rosen/recent_work">Nir Rosen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Doc_File_3140_1.pdf" length="116927" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:20:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3741 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Privatizing Foreign Policy </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/privatizing_foreign_policy_6702</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In August 2000, a motley array of democracy activists, politicians, and fringe nationalists trudged into a hotel in Budapest. The assembled figures constituted the leading members of Serbia’s political opposition movement -- a fractured and increasingly desperate group. Only weeks earlier, Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic, hoping to catch his erstwhile opposition off guard, had announced snap presidential elections. After watching his domestic opponents spend eight years repeatedly snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, Milosevic was confident. But this time, Serbia’s democratic leaders had a secret weapon -- a bespectacled, Harvard-educated political consultant armed with a PowerPoint presentation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Doug E. Schoen,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/privatizing_foreign_policy_6702&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maria_figueroa_kupcu/recent_work">Maria Figueroa Küpçü</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/privatization">Privatization</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6702 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Revamping American Grand Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/revamping_american_grand_strategy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Out of the national trauma of September 11 has emerged a new grand strategy for American foreign policy, comparable in scale and ambition to the strategy of containment that guided American foreign policy for much of the Cold War. Championed by neo-conservatives in and around the Bush administration, this grand strategy -- which I call muscular dominance -- has won the acceptance of neo-liberal hawks associated with the Democratic Party as well. The troubled occupation of Iraq, together with the unfolding drama over the nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea, may eventually force a rethinking of the emerging strategy,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/revamping_american_grand_strategy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/27">Grand Strategy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/545">Best of 2003</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1312 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The End of Alliances</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/the_end_of_alliances</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the Cold War came to an end, the political
scientist Francis Fukuyama heralded the
&quot;End of History.&quot; Decades earlier, the sociologist Daniel Bell had predicted the &quot;End of Ideology.&quot; While we wait for these grand visions to be universalized in practice, we can
anticipate a change that, although more
mundane, is more likely to occur sooner: the
end of alliances. Military alliances, multilateral
and bilateral, have been central to the
diplomacy and national security strategy of
the United States for more than 50 years -- 
so much so that most Americans will find it
hard to imagine a world without them. But
such a world is coming, and as&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/the_end_of_alliances&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/rajan_menon/recent_work">Rajan Menon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1854 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Than Hot Air</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2002/more_than_hot_air</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If there ever was a political instance of an immovable object meeting an irresistible force, it would seem to be George W. Bush versus the treaty known as the Kyoto Protocol.1 The president is as adamantly opposed to the protocol as environmentalists are overwhelmingly in favor of the international agreement reached in 1997 to reduce emissions of so-called greenhouse gases (primarily carbon dioxide), which are widely thought to contribute to global warming. At first, President Bush said he opposed Kyoto because the science on climate change was unclear. He has since changed his stance and now claims that the protocol&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2002/more_than_hot_air&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ricardo_bayon/recent_work">Ricardo Bayon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/546">Best of 2002</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1359 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
