<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>AFX - Global Ethics Monitor</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/178</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Texas Renewable Energy Targets Beat EU</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2002/texas_renewable_energy_targets_beat_eu</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the Earth
Summit started in Johannesburg a week ago expectations were low. There were no major treaties or conventions on the agenda and several
countries -- including the US -- had indicated they were against setting any
form of targets or timetables aimed at reducing
world poverty, protecting the environment, or ensuring sustainable
development. And yet, despite this opposition, a number of businesses and activists
working on issues of renewable energy remained hopeful that the Summit, at
the instigation of the European Union, would agree
on a bold new program of action to stimulate renewable energy around the
world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On Monday, even these small hopes were dashed. The EU&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2002/texas_renewable_energy_targets_beat_eu&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ricardo_bayon/recent_work">Ricardo Bayon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/178">AFX - Global Ethics Monitor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3028 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shop Talk: Environmental Markets</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2002/shop_talk_environmental_markets</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The decade-old global trade in pollution
credits, poised to skyrocket in the near future, began as an idea that
didn&#039;t please either side of the debate over environment and
development.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the first emissions market opened in Chicago in 1993, some
utilities complained that government was imposing too heavy a burden on
their industry and hurting consumers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  Environmentalists, on the other hand, considered emissions trading a
loophole that would enable business to continue polluting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As it turned out, they were both wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Chicago Board of Trade began emissions trading with credits for
sulfur dioxide (SO2), the gas largely responsible for acid rain. According
to a year-2000 report by the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2002/shop_talk_environmental_markets&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ricardo_bayon/recent_work">Ricardo Bayon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/178">AFX - Global Ethics Monitor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2570 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
