<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Globalist</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Assessing Putin</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/assessing_putin_6865</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What will Putin’s legacy amount to? For starters, let us dispense with a giant &amp;quot;red herring&amp;quot; that too many Western commentators have pursued for far too long. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What I am referring to is the question of whether Putin is a “democratic reformer” -- or a “Soviet authoritarian.” 
&lt;/p&gt;
An authoritarian reformer
&lt;p&gt;
The answer, of course, is that Putin is an authoritarian reformer. He is profoundly committed to reforms intended to make Russia into a successful modern state. But at the same time, he is profoundly skeptical of his society’s capacity to undertake such reforms without strong control from above -- at least&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/assessing_putin_6865&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6865 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dining With Putin</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/dining_putin_6866</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Our meal with President Vladimir Putin took place at the presidential villa at Novo-Ogaryevo in 2006. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The drive to the presidential village was a short tour of the world of the new Russian elite -- which is now not so very new anymore, given the years that have passed since the Soviet collapse. 
&lt;/p&gt;

The new Russian elite
&lt;p&gt;
The road led through the former village of Zhukovka, now containing enormous villas -- some almost as large as that of the president. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We rode by a “Luxury Plaza” featuring shops and signs for Armani, Gucci, Dolce and Gabbana, Bentley and Maserati. The “Dream&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/dining_putin_6866&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6866 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My Visit To Khanti-Mansiisk, Part II</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/my_visit_khanti_mansiisk_part_ii_6869</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The museum of the Khanti and Mansii tradition is intelligently and attractively designed, with vaguely New-Ageish references to Khanti and Mansii religion, but also genuinely interesting and informative about their beliefs. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Among these, following the Russian conquest of the 17th century, was a conflation of Jesus Christ with their traditional principal object of worship, the bear. 
&lt;/p&gt;
Hopes for Khanti-Mansiisk
&lt;p&gt;
For anyone with a sense of Russian history, Khanti-Mansiisk has a certain heartbreaking quality. This was the dream of the Soviet reformers under Gorbachev -- a Russia whose immense natural resources -- freed from the crushing burden of bloated military spending, insane&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/my_visit_khanti_mansiisk_part_ii_6869&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6869 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My Visit To Khanti-Mansiisk, Part I</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/my_visit_khanti_mansiisk_part_i_6867</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last autumn, I found myself by invitation of some very respectable investors in a high-class Moscow night-club shaped like an amphitheatre. The rake-thin, huge-eyed “models” perched in the tiers above me, and under the flashing strobe-lights, adopted in my inebriated imagination the forms of exquisitely beautiful, slightly predatory roosting birds. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My previous, sober after-dinner speech on Russia’s economic prospects to these international investors had been succeeded by a line of can-can dancers clad only in feathers and led by a bear waving a Russian flag. 
&lt;/p&gt;
Reminders of the Past
&lt;p&gt;
The moment reminded me of a British journalist colleague, who a few&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/my_visit_khanti_mansiisk_part_i_6867&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6867 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The British Empire&#039;s Lessons for Its U.S. Brother</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/british_empires_lessons_its_u_s_brother_6871</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In contemplating a future world in which U.S. power is used more effectively, but in more limited ways -- indeed, more effectively because of these limits -- Americans can draw upon the example of British strategy in the century before 1914, when its global power was at its zenith. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This experience has been used by writers such as Niall Ferguson and Max Boot as an example for the exercise of American global power today and in the future. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Such recommendations too often ignore the fact that British power, even at its height, was in certain key respects limited. And it&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/british_empires_lessons_its_u_s_brother_6871&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/european_union">Europe</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6871 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Conflict In Iraq And U.S. Elites</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/conflict_iraq_and_u_s_elites_6872</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What has failed in Iraq has been not just the strategy of the administration of George W. Bush -- but a whole way of looking at the world. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This consists of the beliefs that the United States is both so powerful and so obviously good that it has the ability to spread democracy throughout the world; that if necessary, this can be achieved through war; that this mission can also be made to advance particular U.S. national interests -- and that this combination will naturally be supported by good people all over the world, irrespective of their own political traditions,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/conflict_iraq_and_u_s_elites_6872&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/anatol_lieven/recent_work">Anatol Lieven</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6872 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The United States in the Global Concert of Powers</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_united_states_in_the_global_concert_of_powers</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lind&amp;#39;s new book, The American Way of Strategy, explores this issue in greater detail. Please click here for additional information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;* * * &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Theodore Roosevelt was in favor of it. So was his cousin Franklin -- and his rival Woodrow Wilson. “It” was an alliance or “concert” of peace-loving, law-abiding great powers that would cooperate to maintain international security. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ending the cycle of world wars by establishing a great-power concert was the goal of Americans in World War I and World War II and underlay the foundation of the League of Nations and later the United Nations. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/the_united_states_in_the_global_concert_of_powers&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/39">Best of 2006</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:48:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4155 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dean, Yankee of Vermont</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/dean_yankee_of_vermont</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The values of America&#039;s Yankee Puritans were forged in the religious and political conflicts of 16th- and 17th-century Britain. Puritan opposition to Catholicism and Anglicanism translates, among their descendants, into strong support for the separation of church and state. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Puritan values = New England values&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Puritan belief that the community of &quot;saints&quot; as well as the individual is a moral actor lives on in a strong sense of civic spirit and support for social reform. New Englanders were over-represented in the campaigns to abolish slavery, to end segregation  --  and to provide equal rights for women. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Puritans&#039;&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/dean_yankee_of_vermont&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2587 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Multipolar World Vs. The Superpower</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/the_multipolar_world_vs_the_superpower</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A grand strategy, such as it is pursued by the Bush Administration, ultimately rests on the simple idea of a unipolar world  --  the notion that the United States is the only power that counts in the world today.&lt;/p&gt; France&amp;#39;s Envy for Power &lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, that is also why neo-conservative advocates are so critical of France&amp;#39;s avowed goal of creating a multi-polar world, attributing it to France&amp;#39;s superpower &amp;quot;envy.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yet for all practical purposes, a multipolar world already exists. On a global plane, the United States may appear to be the world&amp;#39;s only superpower, spending more than the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/the_multipolar_world_vs_the_superpower&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/19">Global Middle Class Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/545">Best of 2003</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1313 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Middle East Democracy  --  A Reality Check for U.S. Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/middle_east_democracy_a_reality_check_for_u_s_policy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are three reasons to question the emphasis of a U.S. mission in the Middle East. The first relates to whether the United States can overcome the deep legacy of distrust  --  and even hatred  --  past U.S. policies have created in the region. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. empire for the common good&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neo-conservatives in and around the Bush Administration like to believe the United States is a different kind of hegemonic power. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They assert that the country does not seek imperial advantages and that it uses its power for the common good. In some parts of the world, it&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/middle_east_democracy_a_reality_check_for_u_s_policy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/165">The Globalist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/19">Global Middle Class Initiative</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2175 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
