<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Harvard Political Review</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1300</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Doug Rediker in Harvard Political Review | &#039;Sovereign Wealth and Private Equity Funds are Here to Stay&#039; </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/doug_rediker_harvard_political_review_sovereign_wealth_and_private_equity_funds_are_here_stay</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://hprsite.squarespace.com/golden-geese-042008/2008/4/22/golden-geese.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Full article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . .  The new kids on the block, in terms of economic might, are sovereign wealth funds. Clouding their speedy rise are questions raised by Western media and governments about their management and purposes. Do they pose a threat to political stability? “That’s the three-trillion dollar question,” said &lt;strong&gt;Douglas Rediker&lt;/strong&gt;, Co-Director of the &lt;strong&gt;Global Strategic Finance Initiative &lt;/strong&gt;at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, in an interview with HPR. Sovereign wealth funds have never been this big before, or grown at such a pace. The International Monetary Fund has estimated that sovereign wealth funds could account for $12 trillion dollars by 2012.One problem that belies handy analysis of sovereign wealth funds, however, is their sheer diversity. Countries from Norway to Botswana operate sovereign wealth funds, and generalization about their aims or activities is difficult. But uncertainties about the motives of these funds are growing. . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“The potential to use this finance as a political tool exists,” said &lt;strong&gt;Rediker&lt;/strong&gt;. . . “There have been few if any instances where you can point to political influence having been part of an investment decision,” said &lt;strong&gt;Rediker&lt;/strong&gt;. And it’s difficult to single out sovereign wealth funds for reform, for an important practical reason. &lt;strong&gt;Rediker &lt;/strong&gt;noted that they disclose just as much information as private equity or hedge funds, and since giving up information can mean giving up market advantages, sovereign wealth funds are not keen on it. . . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/douglas_rediker/recent_work">Douglas Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1300">Harvard Political Review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1073">Global Strategic Finance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/sovereign_wealth_funds">sovereign wealth funds</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7134 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
