<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Transnational Issues</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna in Turkish Daily News | &#039;Redifining Turkey&#039;s Strategic Orientation&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_turkish_daily_news_redifining_turkeys_strategic_orientation</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...The implications from denying Turkey an avenue to the European Union
are not limited to damaging Turkey, however, but also diminish Europe
itself. As &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt; affirmed, “Europe increasingly needs Turkey,”
which he defines as representing a “geopolitical asset (that) Europe
cannot do without...” &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=107998&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_turkish_daily_news_redifining_turkeys_strategic_orientation#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1360">Turkish Daily News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7370 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffrey Lewis in New York Times | &quot;Western Experts Monitor China’s Nuclear Sites for Signs of Earthquake Damage&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/jeffrey_lewis_new_york_times_western_experts_monitor_china_s_nuclear_sites_signs_earthquake_damage</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/world/asia/16nuke.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ref=world&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Full article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. . . &lt;strong&gt;Jeffrey G. Lewis,&lt;/strong&gt; an arms control specialist at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, a nonprofit research group in Washington, said the military buildings that make up Plant 821 were probably unusually strong compared with civilian structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I’d rather have been in the reactor building than a grade school” on Monday when the quake struck, he said. The site’s various plants “were built as military facilities, and so I wouldn’t be surprised if, by and large, they came through pretty well,” he added. . .
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jeffrey_lewis/recent_work">Jeffrey Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/961">Nuclear Strategy &amp;amp; Nonproliferation Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7171 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett and Nir Rosen in IPS News | &quot;Lebanon Crisis Shows Hues of Iraq&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_and_nir_rosen_ips_news_lebanon_crisis_shows_hues_iraq</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42358&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Full article&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
. . . &amp;quot;This is more and more becoming a Sunni-Shi&#039;a conflict. It really does feel like Iraq,&amp;quot; said journalist &lt;strong&gt;Nir Rosen&lt;/strong&gt; in a conference call with analysts and reporters at the &lt;strong&gt;New American Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Sunni militias, backed by the Future Movement, formed over the last year, and have been a complete failure, perhaps because they were fighting for money. They just disappeared and caused a great sense of betrayal and shock among Sunnis,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Rosen&lt;/strong&gt;, adding that the perceived victimisation of Sunnis had instigated more radical circles in Tripoli to fight against the &amp;quot;apostate Shi&#039;a&amp;quot;, that they appeared &amp;quot;eager to start this battle&amp;quot;, according to &lt;strong&gt;Rosen&lt;/strong&gt;. . . 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Rosen&lt;/strong&gt;, who is currently in Beirut and accompanied Shi&#039;a Amal fighters as they battled on the streets, described Hezbollah fighters acting &amp;quot;hand in hand&amp;quot; with the army on the commercial strip of Hamra Street in West Beirut. Most of the targets captured by Hezbollah and their allies were subsequently turned over to the army. &amp;quot;They are not trying to change the demographic balance in Beirut, it is to make a show of force to let rival militias know [Hezbollah] could have a real political coup,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Rosen&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;quot;Hezbollah&#039;s main concern is to keep weapons; it doesn&#039;t have much interest in running things in Lebanon.&amp;quot; . . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Lebanon, in the post Hariri period, is not in any really meaningful sense a democracy. It is a political order rooted in the distribution of political assets along sectarian lines, and the patterns of distribution are way out of whack with demographic reality, particularly with regard to the Shi&#039;a,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Flynt Leverett&lt;/strong&gt;, once a senior specialist on the Middle East for the Bush administration&#039;s National Security Council. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Leverett&lt;/strong&gt; described the Lebanese political arena as a &amp;quot;sideshow&amp;quot; when compared to the Bush administration&#039;s real strategic interests in the region. Washington champions hollow talk about &amp;quot;democracy&amp;quot; as a bulwark against radical influences, he said, but in reality the policy -- what he called the &amp;quot;height of strategic malpractice&amp;quot; -- only serves as an excuse for the U.S. not to diplomatically engage with the countries it must: Iran and Syria. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;[It was a mistake] to latch on to this so-called March 14th coalition -- Cedar Revolution -- in Lebanon and to decide to use it as a fulcrum for trying to leverage various U.S. policy objectives,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Leverett&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;quot;What we have done here is basically what we did in the 1980s. We picked a group of Western-oriented Lebanese political actors whom we liked because they kind of looked like us and talked like us,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;We decided to array them against people who have real street cred; the results then were disastrous, and I think the results now are proving to be very bad.&amp;quot; . . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/nir_rosen/recent_work">Nir Rosen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/787">Inter Press Service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7180 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna in Financial Express | India Doesn’t Count Yet</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_financial_express_india_doesn_t_count_yet</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.financialexpress.com/news/India-doesn-t-count-yet/302120/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Financial Express | India Doesn’t Count Yet&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;US — a second world nation? The thought may be radical to most, but that’s exactly what &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt;, fellow at &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt; argues in &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/books/second_world&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order&lt;/a&gt;, saying the 21st century will be dominated by three first-world superpowers: the United States, China and the European Union. And they will compete for resources in nations in east Europe, Latin America and West Asia — countries of the second world. Suman Tarafdar tries to figure out where the world is headed.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Financial Express: Why do you see the US becoming a second world state? Where did it fail to read the geopolitical mutiny?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna:&lt;/strong&gt; The US did fail to read the ways in which pivotal second world states such as Iran and Venezuela could stand up to the US and sustain their defiance, not to mention the insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan. America’s imperial overstretch is palpable in its Economy that has been weakened by the war and exposed other domestic vulnerabilities such as a crumbling infrastructure, declining health and education standards, and deep political divisions. Those latter factors are hallmarks of second world countries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Financial Express: The ‘deep differences in interests among the big three make forging a “culture of peace” difficult,’ yet the three are also bound to each other by economic ties. Where does the resolution lie?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna:&lt;/strong&gt; A “culture of peace” can have several sources, such as mutual economic dependence in investment and trade, and also the reality of nuclear deterrence. It could be that rather than defining their interests in divergent terms — such as in the pursuit of exclusive access to oil and gas resources — powerful states such as China, India and America could focus on expanding supply through joint exploration and development. One sees this happening already between Japan, China, and Korea in the waters between them. Also, there are issues such as terrorism and climate that affect all powers as well, and need to be addressed jointly. . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1292">Financial Express</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7085 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffrey Lewis on NPR | Syria Revelation Could Affect N. Korea Nuclear Talks</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/jeffrey_lewis_npr_syria_revelation_could_affect_n_korea_nuclear_talks</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89922838&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NPR | Syria Revelation Could Affect N. Korea Nuclear Talks&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
. . . But it remains to be seen whether Thursday&#039;s intelligence briefing in Congress will help or hinder the negotiations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Jeffrey Lewis&lt;/strong&gt;, who runs the Web site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1865/full-text-of-the-syria-briefing&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;armscontrolwonk.com&lt;/a&gt;, says it&#039;s clear that the briefing is meant to undermine the negotiations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Members of Congress who have been pushing hardest to have this information declassified — or at least put out into the public domain in some form or another — are those who want to make the point that North Korea can&#039;t be trusted,&amp;quot; Lewis says. . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jeffrey_lewis/recent_work">Jeffrey Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/154">National Public Radio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/961">Nuclear Strategy &amp;amp; Nonproliferation Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7083 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna on NPR | America&#039;s Waning Influence in &#039;The Second World&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_npr_americas_waning_influence_second_world</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89492105&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NPR | America&#039;s Waning Influence in &#039;The Second World&#039;&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt; believes that America&#039;s dominant moment is over. In his new book, &amp;quot;The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order,&amp;quot; he argues that the 21st centruy will be dominated by three first-world superpowers: the United States, China and the European Union. . . 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/154">National Public Radio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7058 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Transnational Issues</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/american_strategy/transnational</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 The prominence of transnational issues in the first part of the 21st century cannot be understated. Energy politics, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and the substantial shift of power from the West to Asia--all are changing the parameters in which policy and investment decisions are formed and executed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Emerging in the vacuum of sustained and disciplined global leadership, what once were secondary symptoms of international neglect  are now driving forces on the international scene and must be addressed both as cause and effect. The great test of American leadership in the coming decades will&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/programs/american_strategy/transnational&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/672">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6950 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
