New America Policy Papers: 2013

Papers and other formal publications from our policy programs are available below. To jump to another year in the archives, please use the links at right.

Key Questions on the Obama Administration’s 2014 Education Budget Request

  • By
  • Clare McCann,
  • New America Foundation
  • and Education Policy Program
April 10, 2013

President Obama sent his fiscal year 2014 budget request to Congress on April 10, 2013. The New America Foundation’s Education Policy Program released this subsequent issue brief, “Key Questions on the Obama Administration’s 2014 Budget Request."

Expanded Social Security

  • By
  • Michael Lind,
  • Joshua Freedman,
  • Steven Hill,
  • New America Foundation
  • and Robert Hiltonsmith, Demos
April 3, 2013

Executive Summary
The conventional wisdom about Social Security is profoundly misguided. According to today’s mistaken consensus, the U.S. as a society cannot afford to allocate the money to pay for the present level of Social Security benefits for retirees in future generations. The solution, it is widely argued, is to cut benefits – either directly by means-testing or indirectly by raising the retirement age or allowing inflation to erode their real value over time. In this narrative, tax-favored private savings vehicles like 401(k)s and IRAs should be expanded in order to compensate for the allegedly necessary cuts in Social Security.

Got Resilience

  • By Richard LeBaron, Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council; Glen Hartless, Intelligence Community Member
April 2, 2013

When we and several colleagues assembled the interagency Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications (CSCC) at the State Department in late 2010, our primary focus was poking holes in al-Qaeda’s appeal to young recruits by identifying the terrorist group’s weaknesses, its contradictions, its victimization of other Muslims, and other clearly negative attributes.  The objective was to plant enough doubt in the minds of potential recruits that they would decide not to use violence to address their grievances.  At the same time, we began an effort to identify “positive narrat

Programs:

The Case for Strengthening Personal Networks in California Local Government

  • By
  • Rachel Burstein,
  • New America Foundation
April 2, 2013

The term “innovation” is often applied to products emerging from the private sector. When innovation is discussed in the context of government, commentators generally concentrate on achievements at the federal level. The popular press rarely devotes attention to innovation in local government, or examines innovation as a process, rather than an output. Yet cities and counties have the capacity to engage and impact wide sectors of the public through innovative policies, practices and programs; many are already doing just that.

Mobile Leapfrogging and Digital Divide Policy

  • By
  • Philip Napoli,
  • Jonathan Obar,
  • New America Foundation
April 1, 2013

This paper examines the emerging global phenomenon of mobile leapfrogging in Internet access. Leapfrogging refers to the process in which new Internet users are obtaining access by mobile devices and are skipping the traditional means of access: personal computers. This leapfrogging of PC-based Internet access has been hailed in many quarters as an important means of rapidly and inexpensively reducing the gap in Internet access between developed and developing nations, thereby reducing the need for policy interventions to address this persistent digital divide.

How Do They Know?

  • By
  • Lorelei Kelly,
  • New America Foundation
March 26, 2013

Here in the United States and around the world, elected leaders seem paralyzed by information overload. Despite a wealth of information at our fingertips, high- quality, unbiased facts have become increasingly hidden in our noisy, saturated world. Worse, much of the public discourse has become routinely gridlocked, as proponents on each side of a debate regularly come to the table armed with their own “facts.” Faced with this deluge of information, the role of congressional staffers is increasingly one of fact-checking rather than fact-finding.

The Conflict in Syria

  • By
  • Brian Fishman,
  • New America Foundation
  • and Radha Iyengar, RAND Corp.
March 19, 2013

This paper concludes that the most likely medium-run end state to the conflict in Syria is de facto partition of the country into a region controlled by the current regime and another region divided among various rebel factions. Of the potential end states analyzed here, de facto partition is not only the most likely, it is also the worst for U.S. interests. The analysis is based on a series of decision matrices that are standard in the Multi-Attribute Decision Making approach, a method of systematically comparing objectives across a range of national interests.

Capped Internet: No Bargain for the American Public

  • By
  • Hibah Hussain,
  • Danielle Kehl,
  • Benjamin Lennett,
  • Patrick Lucey,
  • New America Foundation
February 20, 2013

Below you will find the full text of "Capped Internet: No Bargain for the American Public," a policy brief by the Open Technology Institute. Download a PDF version here.

Reorienting America's Foreign Policy Toward North Africa and the Middle East

  • By
  • Leila Hilal,
  • New America Foundation
February 12, 2013

The Arab uprisings that shook the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have raised significant questions about the efficacy of America’s leadership in the region. After decades of aligning with and materially supporting authoritarian regimes, the United States was forced to abandon several allied Arab leaders in a remarkably short amount of time, out of deference to universal values and public will. The result left Washington exposed, lacking long-standing traditional allies and doubting basic strategic assumptions.

The State of Global Jihad Online

  • By Aaron Y. Zelin, Richard Borow Fellow, Washington Institute for Near East Policy
February 4, 2013

More than 11 years after the attacks of 9/11 and nearly a decade since the rise of popular online jihadi Internet forums, there is strikingly little empirical research on the manner in which jihadi activists use the Web to propagate their cause. Whereas researchers and policy analysts have systematically collected and analyzed the primary source material produced by al-Qaeda and its allies, very little work has been done on the conduits through which that information is distributed—and even to what extent anyone is accessing that propaganda other than counterterrorism analysts.

Syndicate content