<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>All Articles of 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles</link>
 <description>All Articles of 2008</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Go For the Bitter Bloc</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/go_bitter_bloc_7094</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last week&#039;s Pennsylvania primary demonstrated that Barack Obama is not unbeatable. This might sound a strange way to put it. Hasn&#039;t it always been true that Obama is beatable?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Well, consider an alternate reality in which Obama had won Pennsylvania. His people certainly thought long and deeply about this alternate reality -- why else spend a staggering $12 million on one state&#039;s primary? Hillary Clinton would have dropped out. Obama would have shown that he can win white working-class votes in a big, diverse, populous state. Way back after the Iowa caucuses, he playfully observed that everywhere he goes becomes Obama&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2009/go_bitter_bloc_7094&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reihan_salam/recent_work">Reihan Salam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/45">The Weekly Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/minorities">Minorities</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_integration">Social Integration</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7094 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Population Bombing</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/population_bombing_7113</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the 20th century, a global network of colluding activists, institutions, and governments sought to engineer solutions to various real and perceived social problems by, as Matthew Connelly puts it in his new book, planning &amp;quot;other people&#039;s families.&amp;quot; In its most egregious expression, this movement led to the forced sterilization of millions of people around the world, including many thousands in the U.S., on the grounds that they were -- genetically or otherwise -- unfit. California alone had sterilized 7,500 people by 1931, and the practice continued in other states up until the 1970s.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This movement also, through philanthropies and government-directed&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/population_bombing_7113&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/183">National Review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7113 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Israel At 60</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/israel_60_7136</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I don&#039;t often, or ever really, write about my own relationship to Israel or how I ended up there, but I&#039;ll make an exception for its 60th anniversary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My relationship with Israel started at the time of the ‘good&#039; Iraq war. You remember, the Iraq war whose ambitions were limited to ensuring continued access to Kuwaiti oil -- not the contemporary trifecta effort to own the oil, change the regime, and transform the region.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In January of 1991 I was working in London as the political officer of the Union of Jewish Students, arguing Israel&#039;s case on campus (and attempting to do&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/israel_60_7136&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/daniel_levy/recent_work">Daniel Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/772">The American Prospect Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7136 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bin Laden Or Bust</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/bin_laden_or_bust_7132</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Dude! What a rad plan! Kicking back over drinks at Bungalow 8, the hard-to-get-into Manhattan nightclub, filmmaker Morgan Spurlock hatched the idea of a humorous documentary and book about the hunt for Osama bin Laden. Your average auteur would wake up the next morning back in his Brooklyn crib, reach for the Advil and realize that searching for the largest mass murderer in U.S. history is about as funny as a pounding hangover.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But Spurlock is not an auteur easily deterred. He made his name with &amp;quot;Super Size Me,&amp;quot; the 2004 documentary in which he ate nothing but Mickey D&#039;s, watched&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/bin_laden_or_bust_7132&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_bergen/recent_work">Peter Bergen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/44">The Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7132 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stealth Marketers</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/stealth_marketers_7130</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A few weeks ago, devoted listeners of National Public Radio member stations were treated to an episode of the award-winning radio series The Infinite Mind called &amp;quot;Prozac Nation: Revisited.&amp;quot; The segment featured four prestigious medical experts discussing the controversial link between antidepressants and suicide. In their considered opinions, all four said that worries about the drugs have been overblown.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The radio show, which was broadcast nationwide and paid for in part by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, had the air of quiet, authoritative credibility. Host Dr. Fred Goodwin, a former director of the National&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/stealth_marketers_7130&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/shannon_brownlee/recent_work">Shannon Brownlee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/62">Slate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pharmaceutical_industry">Pharmaceutical Industry</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7130 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Winning Over the Values Voters</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/winning_over_values_voters_7098</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In Barack Obama&#039;s now famous remarks to rich donors in San Francisco in early April, he attributed the fact that white Democrats in small towns were resisting his candidacy to their anger over their economic misfortune. &amp;quot;They get bitter,&amp;quot; Obama said, &amp;quot;and cling to guns or religion... as a way to explain their frustration.&amp;quot; Obama seemed to be implying that social conservatism is a toxic byproduct of economic distress -- and it may have hurt him in Pennsylvania last week, where he lost the primary contest to Hillary Clinton.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yet the notion expressed by Obama is hardly new. Way back in&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/winning_over_values_voters_7098&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/96">Newsweek</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7098 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dialogue Isn&#039;t the Last Word</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/dialogue_isnt_last_word_7112</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Barack Obama loves reconciliation, but it isn&#039;t all it&#039;s cracked up to be. Sometimes it isn&#039;t even possible, and let&#039;s be honest, it isn&#039;t always the point.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
About six weeks ago, during his &amp;quot;More Perfect Union&amp;quot; speech on race that some heralded as the second coming of Abraham Lincoln, Obama had a choice between reconciliation and renunciation, and, true to form, he chose the former. He protested that he could &amp;quot;no more disown&amp;quot; the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. than he could disown &amp;quot;the black community&amp;quot; or his own (sometimes politically incorrect) white grandmother. Really?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Right about now, his much-heralded tutorial on&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/dialogue_isnt_last_word_7112&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/gregory_rodriguez/recent_work">Gregory Rodriguez</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_integration">Social Integration</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:19:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7112 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Schwarzenegger-Shriver: Protecting the Brand</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/schwarzenegger_shriver_protecting_brand_7121</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One afternoon early in his second year as governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger flew home from Sacramento to Los Angeles with a vexing political problem. He needed to cut $2 billion from the budget he was putting together, and any of his best options for doing it could get him into trouble.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If he raised taxes, he&#039;d anger his fellow Republicans. Break a promise to increase education funding and he&#039;d alienate the top Democratic interest group, the California Teachers Assn. Option 3: Cut health and human services, the next biggest category in the budget. He didn&#039;t like the idea, but some of his&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/schwarzenegger_shriver_protecting_brand_7121&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joe_mathews/recent_work">Joe Mathews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/248">Los Angeles Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7121 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can Technology Save Intellectual Property Without Crippling Our Culture?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/can_technology_save_intellectual_property_without_crippling_our_culture_7110</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The easy knock on Tarleton Gillespie&#039;s Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture is that it seems dated. In walking the reader through the many issues and arguments of digital copyright, Gillespie focuses on three seminal attempts at Digital Rights Management -- the Recording Industry Association of America&#039;s failed Secure Digital Music Initiative, moviemakers&#039; somewhat more successful efforts to lock down DVDs, and the major television networks&#039; push to require &amp;quot;broadcast flags&amp;quot; on digital television signals.


All three battles, while important, were waged years ago; more recent, equally relevant examples are touched on briefly or not at&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/can_technology_save_intellectual_property_without_crippling_our_culture_7110&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/troy_k_schneider/recent_work">Troy K. Schneider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1296">Resource Center for Cyberculture Studies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/intellectual_property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/media">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7110 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Here Comes the Second World</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/here_comes_second_world_7069</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This article is adapted from Parag Khanna&#039;s book The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The term &amp;quot;second world&amp;quot; has fallen out of use. It used to mean countries of the socialist world; today I use the phrase to refer to those countries in eastern Europe and central Asia, Latin America, the middle east and southeast Asia which are both rich and poor, developed and underdeveloped, postmodern and pre-modern, cosmopolitan and tribal -- all at the same time. This is not a temporary state between third world and first, but a permanent condition in which&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/here_comes_second_world_7069&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/60">PROSPECT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/asia">Asia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/european_union">Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/global_governance">Global Governance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/india">India</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/latin_america">Latin America</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 09:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7069 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wilson and the Founders: The Roots of Liberal Foreign Policy </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/wilson_and_founders_roots_liberal_foreign_policy_7108</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This article is adapted from Widmer’s January 2008 presentation at “The Liberal Foreign Policy Tradition,” a conference cosponsored by CIS, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the History and Democracy Project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We can&#039;t do much better than reclaiming the Declaration of Independence as a fundamental foreign policy document in American history. We have a tendency to read it in a simplistic way, and to think of it only as a sort of airy declaration of what were then human rights, and a declaration of separation from England. But, in fact, the founders had a fairly well-articulated sense of what they&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/wilson_and_founders_roots_liberal_foreign_policy_7108&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ted_widmer/recent_work">Ted Widmer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1295">MIT Center For International Studies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7108 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The U.S. Senate: Stalling Hemispheric Arms Control</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/u_s_senate_stalling_hemispheric_arms_control_7104</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In 1997, President Bill Clinton, standing beside Mexican president Ernesto Zedillo in the Organization of American States’ flag-bedecked Hall of the Americas, declared: “Gun trafficking is an issue of national security for our governments, and a matter of neighborhood security for all of us in the Americas.” The presidents had joined together to sign an OAS treaty known as the Firearms Convention, or by its Spanish initials as CIFTA, designed to end the illicit manufacture and trafficking of guns, ammunition, explosives, and related materials. It requires that ratifying nations create laws (if they do not already exist) that establish procedures&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/u_s_senate_stalling_hemispheric_arms_control_7104&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1294">North America Congress on Latin America</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7104 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Confessions Of a Sweatshop Inspector </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/confessions_sweatshop_inspector_7095</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I remember one particularly bad factory in China. It produced outdoor tables, parasols, and gazebos, and the place was a mess. Work floors were so crowded with production materials that I could barely make my way from one end to the other. In one area, where metals were being chemically treated, workers squatted at the edge of steaming pools as if contemplating a sudden, final swim. The dormitories were filthy: the hallways were strewn with garbage -- orange peels, tea leaves -- and the only way for anyone to bathe was to fill a bucket with cold water. In a&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/confessions_sweatshop_inspector_7095&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/t_frank/recent_work">T.A. Frank</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/48">The Washington Monthly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/labor">Labor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7095 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maverick Or Maneuverer?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/maverick_or_maneuverer_7070</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ever since &amp;quot;authenticity&amp;quot; became the quality we most value in our politicians, its converse, &amp;quot;hypocrisy,&amp;quot; has been the political vice of which we are most conscious. Thus, those who have noticed that Sen. John McCain enjoys a reputation as a &amp;quot;maverick&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;stands up to special interests&amp;quot; while leading a campaign that is operated and funded entirely by lobbyists have seen this as a contradiction. Is McCain a hypocrite, or perhaps a divided soul, with the angelic maverick voice of reform perched on one shoulder and a diabolical little influence-peddler on the other? Who, journalists ask, is the real John&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/maverick_or_maneuverer_7070&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/campaign_finance">Campaign Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7070 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are You Confused Yet?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/are_you_confused_yet_7087</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Polls show that health care ranks near the top of voters’ concerns, especially among Democrats. And for those who say “the economy” is the top issue, health care is usually a major part of their financial worries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And yet, voters must be awfully confused about where the Democrats stand on health care. On the one hand, both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton say they want to insure everyone -- and in much the same way. On the other hand, they are beating each other up at every turn. Before the Pennsylvania primary, Mr. Obama ran yet another ad arguing&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/are_you_confused_yet_7087&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7087 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Music Industry&#039;s Extortion Scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/music_industrys_extortion_scheme_7081</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What would you do if a bully -- let&#039;s call him &amp;quot;Joey Giggles&amp;quot; -- kept snatching your ice-cream cone? OK, now what if Joey Giggles then told you, &amp;quot;If you pay me five bucks a month, I&#039;ll stop snatching your ice cream.&amp;quot; Depending on how much you hate getting beaten up, and how much you love ice-cream cones, you might decide that caving in is the way to go. This is what&#039;s called a protection racket. It&#039;s also potentially the new model for how we&#039;ll buy and listen to music.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Let&#039;s back up for a second. Four companies (Universal Music Group,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/music_industrys_extortion_scheme_7081&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reihan_salam/recent_work">Reihan Salam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/62">Slate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/intellectual_property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/media">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7081 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cracks In the Foundation</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/cracks_foundation_7100</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain appear anxious to move into the White House, none of them have much to say about housing. Yet rarely a day goes by that the headlines don&#039;t mention the current housing crisis and its threat to the financial markets and the economy. This has led to a strange disconnect between the presidential campaigns and national reality.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Subprime lending and the ensuing foreclosures are being blamed for the crisis, but the problems and blame go much deeper. The fact is, our nation does not have a housing plan, and has not had one for&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/cracks_foundation_7100&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/944">Guardian Unlimited</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/housing">Housing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7100 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dusting Off a Managing Tome</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/dusting_managing_tome_7090</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of all of Peter Drucker&#039;s achievements -- advising captains of industry and heads of state, coining the term &amp;quot;knowledge worker,&amp;quot; winning the Presidential Medal of Freedom -- the most remarkable may be this: In 1974, his 800-plus-page tome, Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, vaulted past The Joy of Sex on the national best seller list.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last week, HarperCollins released a revised edition of Management. And regardless of whether it winds up eclipsing Bonk, the latest hot-selling volume on the physiology and psychology of sex, I can tell you this: It deserves a spot on every manager&#039;s shelf, much as the Physicians&#039; Desk&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/dusting_managing_tome_7090&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/rick_wartzman/recent_work">Rick Wartzman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1088">BusinessWeek.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7090 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Rocky&#039;s State, a Legislator Can Still Outpunch an Orator</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/rockys_state_legislator_can_still_outpunch_orator_7068</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The razor-thin margin separating the contenders for the Democratic nomination grew even thinner at the weekend. Why is this battle so close? A simple reason is that, despite the occasional invective, Americans genuinely admire both the charismatic Barack Obama and the fiercely resilient Hillary Clinton. When John McCain is thrown into the mix, we have the greatest reality show ever, an epic clash of survivalists. It is a shame Sergio Leone is not here to direct the final scene. But the general election is not until November. For now, it comes down to the Democratic nomination, and that prize will&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/rockys_state_legislator_can_still_outpunch_orator_7068&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ted_widmer/recent_work">Ted Widmer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/180">The Guardian (London)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7068 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Joe Lunch Bucket Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/joe_lunch_bucket_strategy_7062</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If Americans are such huge fans of big dreams and high rolling, self-made tycoons and upward mobility, why then do we insist on seeing our national political elites -- who are also generally our economic and educational elites -- throw back a shot of whiskey or lace up bowling shoes?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Why do we need to pretend that high-flying politicians who graduated from the fanciest schools and dine at the toniest restaurants really don&#039;t live in a different world and -- dare I say it -- class than the rest of us?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The easy answer is that we want to identify with them,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/joe_lunch_bucket_strategy_7062&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/gregory_rodriguez/recent_work">Gregory Rodriguez</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_opinion">Public Opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7062 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Throw Out the Tax Code</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/throw_out_tax_code_7063</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Politicians don&#039;t like to talk about taxes except to brag about cutting them. But with California&#039;s widening budget deficit threatening deep cuts in education and other public services, it&#039;s difficult to avoid discussions about raising taxes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Unfortunately, what&#039;s likely to be lost in the upcoming partisan melee over whether new taxes are needed to close the $16-billion gap is an equally important tax issue -- California&#039;s aging and often unfair tax system needs to be overhauled.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The goal of tax reform should be twofold. One is to generate a more reliable revenue stream. The other is to make the tax&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/throw_out_tax_code_7063&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_paul/recent_work">Mark Paul</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/consumption_tax">Consumption Tax</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/corporate_taxes">Corporate Taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7063 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Knowing Me, Knowing You</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/knowing_me_knowing_you_7072</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Do you want to Google your genes or peer into your future risks of heart disease or cancer? Now you can, according to direct to consumer testing companies. Gone are the days when genetic testing was limited to doctors ordering tests for rare, but prognostically potent, single gene disorders such as Huntington’s disease, Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy, or cystic fibrosis. Thanks to an explosion of newly discovered single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs (pronounced snips), companies are marketing genetic tests for traits ranging from the mundane -- eye colour and wet ear wax -- to serious conditions such as Crohn’s disease and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/knowing_me_knowing_you_7072&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/shannon_brownlee/recent_work">Shannon Brownlee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1241">The British Medical Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pharmaceutical_industry">Pharmaceutical Industry</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7072 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Treatment Options</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/treatment_options_7019</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In his new book, The Healthcare Fix: Universal Insurance for All Americans (MIT Press, 2007), Laurence J. Kotlikoff demonstrates that at some point between 2035 and 2050, the costs of Medicare and Medicaid (two health-care programs that serve only a minority of the population), combined with the costs of Social Security, will approximate the total current cost of the entire federal government as a percentage of GDP. Medicare and Medicaid, without Social Security, will surpass the current cost of government by 2082. To cover the deepening long-term deficits of those two programs would require raising roughly $70-trillion and putting it&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/treatment_options_7019&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/820">The Chronicle of Higher Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7019 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What High Oil Prices Can Do For a Country</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/what_high_oil_prices_can_do_country_7066</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From the outside, Effat College doesn&#039;t seem like a bellwether of change. The all-girls school in Jeddah, a port city on the coast of the Red Sea, is rimmed by unscalable high walls and an empty parking lot, resembling the scene of a freshly departed circus in Middle America. In many ways, the college&#039;s exterior illustrates conventional misperceptions -- closed, drab, and unwelcoming -- of modern Saudi Arabia. Perhaps the only thing less inviting is the bold, red lettering at the top of the form handed to visitors as they enter the kingdom, which reads: &amp;quot;WARNING: Death to Drug Traffickers.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/what_high_oil_prices_can_do_country_7066&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/nicholas_schmidle/recent_work">Nicholas Schmidle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/62">Slate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7066 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clinton Has Strategic Blind Spot On China</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/clinton_has_strategic_blind_spot_china_7047</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A similar version of this article also appears on The New Republic, which features a debate between Steven Clemons and Richard Just, TNR&#039;s deputy editor, on the appropriate response to the Beijing Olympics.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
China&#039;s Olympics are an enticing target for &amp;quot;cause crusaders&amp;quot; who want to taunt the regime with public relations stunts while the global spotlight and attention of billions are watching every countermove China&#039;s leaders make. The &amp;quot;norms&amp;quot; of any state are not really evident unless observed after that state responds to shocks. Cause crusaders are doing their best to exploit the moment to throw&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/clinton_has_strategic_blind_spot_china_7047&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/105">The Daily Yomiuri (Tokyo)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/china">China</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7047 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
