The 40 Republican senators represent barely a third of all Americans, yet one with added Democratic vote they can stymie what most Americans want.
The health care drama in the U.S. Senate is cresting.
After months of hearings--and decades of dithering--it is time to see if the
United States is going to remain the only advanced industrial nation in the
world that does not provide universal health care.
Some have compared the role played by Senator Snowe to
that of Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, who lined up Republican support
for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But that would be overstating the case.
Senator Snowe appears to be driven by personal conviction with little support
within her party. It will be interesting to watch her forthcoming votes to
gauge how far she is willing to break with party ranks. Will she support a
public option? If so, with what conditions?
The health care debate shows in full the Senate's anti-majoritarian
tendencies. Democratic senators hold 60 votes (out of 100), yet so far they
have struggled to fashion legislation because they fear a filibuster, which
allows a mere 41 senators to stymie what the majority wants.
The 40 Republican senators represent barely a third of
all Americans. If a single Democrat is added to a G.O.P. filibuster, they can
torpedo what two-thirds of the nation wants. It's the most blatant form of
minority rule. Only 16 senators are women and five are racial minorities. With
two senators elected per state regardless of population, the Senate is the most
unrepresentative body outside Britain's House of Lords. But at least Britain
has the sense not to allow the Lords to vote on important legislation.
Senators representing a small segment of the nation have
thwarted not only health care reform but also renewable energy policy, sensible
automobile mileage standards, cuts in subsidies for oil companies, tougher
campaign finance reform, Congressional oversight of national security and war,
and more.
So the credibility of the entire Senate is on
the line. Senator Snowe may wield a pivotal vote on health care, but it is in a
body that is unrepresentative and anti-majoritarian by design. How long are we
Americans going to ignore this constitutional defect?
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.
Your tax-deductible gift will help bring promising new voices and ideas into our nation's discourse, and help shape the future of vital public policies.
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.