As the ancient Greeks said, people are known by the heroes they crown, then Americans' penchant for exalting and denouncing says a whole lot about us as a country.
Michael Phelps smokes pot. A-Rod took steroids. What's next? Will US
Airways Capt. Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger get busted too?
Americans love to put their heroes on pedestals almost as much as they
enjoy tearing them down. We trot out the outrage when they're
disgraced. We wring our hands over what it'll do to the poor kids who
look up to them. But if, as the ancient Greeks said, people are known
by the heroes they crown, then Americans' penchant for exalting and
denouncing says a whole lot about us as a country.
The truth is
that we are deeply conflicted about the idea of heroes. Men and women
who are larger than life attract and repel us. On the one hand, our
deeply ingrained egalitarianism makes us bridle at the notion that
anyone is demonstrably better than everyone else. On the other, our
patrimony -- life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, not to mention
constant change -- is abstract and ephemeral; it's difficult to grab
hold of. Other nations and their citizens get to define themselves as
unchanging through the generations; we seek continuity and meaning in
symbols, from the founders to apple pie.
In the 19th century, Abraham Lincoln's secretary of State, William H.
Seward, liked to tell a story about a man after the American Revolution
who insisted on planting a Liberty pole -- a kind of flagstaff erected
as a symbol of protest against British tyranny -- in his village. When
the man's neighbors asked why he still needed one and whether he wasn't
already free enough, he'd respond, "What is liberty without a pole?"
We don't exactly have Liberty poles anymore (although we run the Stars
and Stripes up flagstaffs at every opportunity). Mostly, we choose
human talismans of skill and achievement that symbolize who we want to
be -- the indispensable nation -- and where we hope we're heading as
individuals: to the top of the heap.
Phelps gained fame by
winning gold medals for the U.S. at the Beijing Olympics in a frenzy of
near perfection. Alex Rodriguez, admired for his excellence as a
player, was supposed to help clean up America's pastime in the wake of
the Barry Bonds steroids scandal.
When
tens of thousands of football fans applauded Sullenberger at this
year's Super Bowl in Tampa, Fla., they were congratulating themselves
as much they were the cool, heroic pilot and his crew.
"Hero-worship answers an urgent American need," wrote historian Dixon
Wecter in 1941. "The fan and the autograph hunter, now imitated
elsewhere, are as native to the United States as the catbird and the
Catawba grape. To fix our relation with greatness by means of a
signature in an album, a lock of hair, a photograph or a baseball that
has scored a home run; to haunt stage doors and entries to locker
rooms; to pursue our favorites with candid cameras and sound recorders,
invading their meditations and their honeymoons -- this passion has
made us the premier nation of hero-worshipers."
Athletes,
activists, warriors, actors, jurists -- as long as they vindicate our
belief that anything is possible in these here United States, they're
hero material.
Surprisingly, given how much calumny is heaped
on their heads, no one grabs us more than national political leaders.
Since 1948, when the Gallup Poll began asking Americans whom they most
admire, there have been only a few times when the sitting president was
not at the top of the list. In December's poll, even President Bush
placed second (OK, a distant second) to then-President-elect Barack
Obama.
For any brand of hero, humble beginnings are good;
overcoming hardship and tragedy even better. Not only does that bolster
faith in the American dream, it helps us believe that, under the right
circumstances, we could be just as good as our heroes. Still, there's
nothing like the fall of the great ones to rouse our other fundamental
faith: that all men are created equal. This faith allows anyone to rise
to greatness in our republic, but it also, as Alexis de Tocqueville saw
as far back as the 19th century, "leads the weak to want to drag the
strong down to their level."
Which brings me back to Phelps
and Rodriguez. Despite all the griping about the mistakes these two
made, their flaws fit perfectly into our national ethos. For all our
admiration for the high and mighty, we're equally suspicious of their
power and success. In Wecter's words: "American knees are not supple.
So long as the hero is still alive, the Bronx cheer will never fail to
reach his ears."
We tell ourselves, our heroes are weak and flawed and human, just like the rest of us.
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.
Your tax-deductible gift will help bring promising new voices and ideas into our nation's discourse, and help shape the future of vital public policies.
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.