No one likes red ink, but it is precisely during bad economic times that aggregate education funding should not be cut.
For months, the Wall Street credit crisis has made many
families nervous that the widespread availability of student loans will dry up.
But no matter how many banks fail, there is no danger that families will be
deprived access to federal student loans. None.
More
than 100 banks have stopped issuing student loans, but about 2,000
continue to originate federal student loans. The government maintains two
"fail-safe" systems. To date, not a single student has been unable to
get a federal Stafford Loan. Every family, regardless of income and credit history,
is able to borrow at least $57,500.
The real danger during bad economic times is that tuition often
skyrockets. Here's why: A bad economy depresses state tax revenue. To meet state
balanced-budget requirements, states cut funding for higher education. To make
up those cuts, public colleges hike tuition. Competing private colleges see the
increases and feel empowered to increase their tuitions markedly as well.
Don't Stop Spending
We can stop this trend by adopting more flexible and
sensible state fiscal policies: namely, a willingness to accept deficit
spending for education. No one likes red ink, but it is precisely during bad
economic times that aggregate education funding should not be cut. In fact,
making education recession-proof nationwide without raising taxes is a way out
of an economic crisis.
State budget officials know that low-cost federal student
loans are widely available. That is why states cut higher education funding
when tax revenue is short. They expect families will pay or borrow more for
college after cuts occur.
They're right, but consider the impact. During the last
recession that led to state budget cuts, in-state tuition and fees went up 39%
in one year at the University
of Arizona. From 2000 to
2003, they went up 44% at University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. The average
undergraduate leaves school with more
than $19,000 in federal student loan debt, twice as much as a decade ago.
The Right Way
In response, organizations such as the Cato Institute, a
libertarian think tank, argue that we should deter states and colleges from
raising tuition by cutting student loan subsidies. But that would make college
less affordable for the middle class and less accessible for the poor.
There's a better answer: The 49 states that have
balanced-budget laws should revise them to allow deficit spending on education
during recessions. We learned from the Great Depression that the way out is
with a massive infusion of government-supplied liquidity. Consumer and
government demand drives supply, which in turn drives jobs.
Look at what we've done on the federal level. We passed a $170
billion stimulus plan. We've committed more than $400 billion to ad hoc
Wall Street rescues. We passed a $700 billion bank
bailout plan. But the states are about to move in the opposite direction
and cut spending. That's bad policy right now.
Too much deficit spending is a danger, but so is not
borrowing a neighbor's hose when your house is on fire. We need sensible
revisions to state budget laws that set flexible caps on deficit percentages,
impose objective triggers and require public debt repayment during good times
to prevent runaway spending. But adhering to a balanced-budget principle in an
economic crisis is what Herbert
Hoover did initially. We need the opposite.
Attention governors: Show leadership, revise your budget
laws and make education recession-proof.
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.
Your tax-deductible gift will help bring promising new voices and ideas into our nation's discourse, and help shape the future of vital public policies.
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.