There are about fifty days left until a national election of unusual consequence; perhaps there is still time for journalists to fully vet what McCain did not.
David Westin has served as the president of ABC News for
about eleven years. He oversees the journalism of “Nightline,” “World News with
Charles Gibson,” and “20/20.” The Walt Disney Company owns ABC, however, and,
at times, Westin has seemed to struggle to police the foggy border between news
and entertainment. For example, in 2000--two Presidential-election cycles ago--he
permitted the actor Leonardo DiCaprio to film a talk with President Clinton, to
commemorate Earth Day. After this decision attracted criticism, on the ground
that it was a perversion of journalism, Westin wrote an e-mail to colleagues in
which he denied that he had ever regarded the program as an “interview.” It
couldn’t have been, because having movie stars conduct interviews would be a
violation of professional journalistic standards, and “no one is that stupid.”
In a joking aside, Westin added, “All roles of journalists must be played by
journalists (duh!).”
Last week on ABC, the role of the journalist was played by a journalist, but
otherwise it was on with the show. The network’s headliner was Governor Sarah
Palin, of Alaska, the Republican Party’s
nominee for Vice-President of the United States. For fourteen days
following her nomination, on August 29th, the Governor had appeared at no press
conferences and had granted no interviews. (During her media purdah, Senator
Joseph Biden, the Democratic Party’s nominee for Vice-President, gave
fifty-four interviews or press conferences.) Finally, after negotiations, Palin
agreed to receive Gibson in her home state, and to answer his questions. In
lavish promotional advertisements, ABC referred to this exclusive as “the
interview everybody has been waiting for.” The double-entendre was as close as
Westin came to acknowledging his collaboration with the McCain campaign’s
decision to sequester Palin until the potent anniversary date of September
11th; on that day, Palin’s eldest son, a recent Army enlistee, deployed for
Iraq at a brigade departure ceremony, an event captured by ABC’s cameras, for
broadcast on the evening news.
There is no shame in winning an exclusive interview with a reclusive
subject, of course, and David Westin is hardly responsible for the McCain
campaign’s cynical handling of its Eliza Doolittle problem, but if he had
managed his network’s “get” more responsibly he might have expelled its odor of
compromise. The occasion of the Alaska
governor’s début before the national media called for a lightly edited,
extended one-on-one, aired on a single night, so that American voters might
assess the candidate’s answers and demeanor in full. Instead, apparently to
maximize ratings and branding opportunities, ABC doled out Palin sound bites on
six network broadcasts over two days, as well as in supplemental ABC Radio and
Web releases. In the end, Westin exploited the Governor’s moose-hunting,
baby-juggling appeal as if she were a magnetic contestant on one of the network’s
prime-time reality shows--“Extreme Makeover: White House Edition.”
By now, perhaps, it is quixotic to express disenchantment about the
celebrity narratives--the “personal stories”--that dominate American politics.
After all, John McCain selected Palin only because he was searching for a
counter to Barack Obama’s own television-lit charisma juggernaut. Still, as it
turns out, not all pop idols are equally prepared to lead a nuclear-armed
nation.
Palin’s answers to Gibson’s questions made it clear that all the briefings
and all the cramming that she could absorb in two weeks were not enough to
endow her with what her résumé so plainly indicated that she lacked: sufficient
exposure to national-security issues to serve as President, should she be
required to do so. She confirmed that she has never been abroad, apart from
visits to Canada and Mexico, and a recent trip “that changed my life”
to Kuwait and Germany, where
she met American soldiers. She also said that she has never had occasion to
meet a foreign head of state. She added, a little defensively, “If you go back
in history and if you ask that question of many Vice-Presidents, they may have
the same answer.”
Perhaps she was thinking of the antebellum period. Since the dawn of the
atomic age, of the thirty-one other Vice-Presidential candidates nominated by
both major political parties, perhaps only Spiro Agnew, a governor of Maryland,
had comparably scant exposure to the world beyond the United States at the time
of his selection. However, Agnew did earn a Bronze Star during military service
in France and Germany during
the Second World War. (His Vice-Presidency ended with his resignation, in
1973--something to do with bribery payments, handed over in brown paper bags.)
Palin is a natural orator, and in television interviews granted before she
became a nominee for national office she came across as relaxed, funny, and
self-possessed. In the ABC sessions, she told Gibson that when McCain invited
her to join his ticket, “I didn’t hesitate. . . . You can’t blink. . . . I
didn’t blink.” Palin leaned forward, radiating nervous energy. Gibson, with his
large frame, sonorous voice, and reading glasses perched low on his nose,
loomed over his subject, presenting an unfortunate image of male professorial
condescension as he ticked through foreign-policy issues that he clearly knew
better than Palin did. Even so, the Governor’s anxious-sounding answers to his
questions produced more than enough awkward moments to justify McCain’s
decision to hold her back for study hall. Palin seemed uncertain, for example,
about the meaning of the Bush Doctrine, which has laid out the most important
changes in American defense policy since the end of the Cold War. She sounded a
little nonchalant, too, when Gibson pointed out that her advocacy of membership
in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for the small Caucasus state of Georgia might lead the United States into war with Russia, which
is a nuclear-armed state. “Perhaps so,” Palin said.
The Governor spoke with transparent ease, however, about God and drilling
for oil. Gibson played an excerpt from a video clip of an appearance Palin made
in June of this year at the Wasilla Assembly of God, the Pentecostal church to
which she belonged for twenty-six years, until 2002. The full fifteen-minute
video, which is available on YouTube, provides a flavor of the evangelical
environment that has shaped what Palin calls her “world view.” She told the
congregation, of her efforts to build a gas pipeline across Alaska, “I think God’s will has to be done
in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built--so pray for that.”
The pastor leading the service then predicted to Palin that Alaska would become “one of the refuge
states in the last days,” a place that would have to minister to thousands of
Christians arriving from the Lower Forty-eight for the Rapture. Palin remarked
that when she travels to Christian churches around Alaska, and is warned that a particular
service might involve the raising of hands or other intense expressions of
Christian devotion, she is able to say that she has seen it all: “I grew up at
the Wasilla Assembly of God--nothing freaks me out about the worship service.”
Diversity of religious belief is an American strength, and none of Palin’s
statements remotely disqualify her from national office. Still, the YouTube
version of the Governor’s idiosyncratic narrative of faith, ambition,
motherhood, and frontier life has a slightly different ring from the received
version, which débuted at the Republican Convention last month; the video does
not evoke “Northern Exposure” so much as it does “There Will Be Blood.” There
are about fifty days left until a national election of unusual consequence;
perhaps there is still time for journalists to fully vet what McCain did not.
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.
Your tax-deductible gift will help bring promising new voices and ideas into our nation's discourse, and help shape the future of vital public policies.
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.