Big Mac Politics
The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program, New America in California
Don't do it. Don't tune in to this year's political
conventions.
For two decades, Americans have been wising up and increasingly tuning out
those quadrennial made-for-television pageants that pass for participatory
democracy. In 1976, roughly 22 million people watched Jimmy Carter receive his
party's nomination. By contrast, four years ago, only 16 million viewers
enjoyed the high jinks at the GOP convention. Over the years, declining
interest has persuaded broadcast networks to scale back their coverage, and I
think a lot of us suspect we didn't miss much.
But this year, thanks to heightened interest in the presidential campaign, both
broadcast and cable news networks are bumping up their coverage. And starting
today, it's going to be extra hard to resist the allure of all that elaborately
conceived stagecraft.
My revulsion for the conventions doesn't stem simply from disdain for partisan
politics. Nor am I suggesting that Americans ignore the substance of politics.
But to my mind, conventions are emblematic of everything that's wrong with
American culture. For all our belief in freedom, which by definition breeds
unpredictability, and our pride in our cultural dynamism, U.S. culture is
becoming ever more self-conscious and scripted.
For a minute or two, the advent of reality TV seemed like a corrective to our
canned popular culture. But then we learned that even those minor celebrity
guinea pigs were being poked and prodded so they'd react in predictable ways.
Newfangled audio and video technology also has been heralded as ushering in a
new era of wild and woolly spontaneity. But the YouTube-ization of politics has
only made candidates all the more controlled and scripted, for fear that
someone is watching.
And for all the intimacy that online social networking is supposed to restore
to our atomized lives, networks such as Facebook actually encourage the
creation of self-conscious and idealized personas that may or may not have
anything to do with a person's real personality.
We've turned into a society of poseurs, and our political conventions have
become something akin to the "walk off" in Ben Stiller's
"Zoolander," in which dueling models (candidates) project their
signature "looks."
As long ago as 1961, social critic Daniel Boorstin argued in his book,
"The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America,"
that the U.S.
was threatened by the "menace of unreality." He insisted that
Americans were living in an "age of contrivance" in which
manufactured illusions had become all too powerful. Our civic and cultural
lives, he said, were full of "pseudo-events" populated by
"pseudo-people" whose identities were entirely scripted and staged.
He wrote this, I remind you, when television was young and well before the
advent of the digital age.
The hegemony of mass popular culture clearly made matters worse. Now we swim in
countless images that marketers, producers and political strategists rain down
on us. Our children are socialized by these images. They internalize and mimic
their themes and tropes. The relentless posing, posturing and spinning invades
our collective consciousness.
More than a decade ago, I ran two after-school programs for second-graders in Los Angeles County. One class was made up of
immigrants or the children of immigrants, while the other was all kids born to
U.S.-born parents. At the end of each semester, we produced a video of a skit
that each class wrote. What astonished me was the children's divergent attitude
toward the camera. The immigrant children tended to speak to the camera as they
would have to a person, but the more Americanized children invariably put on
airs by adopting deeper television anchor-style voices or nodding their heads
to indicate seriousness in the way television reporters often do. Only 7 years
old and they were ready for their close-up.
Ultimately, what this all leads to is the death of spontaneity, the squandering
of freedom. It's part of what sociologist George Ritzer calls the
"McDonaldization of society," or "the process by which the
principles of the fast-food restaurant are coming to dominate" all aspects
of our lives. The convenience and predictability that fast food delivers leads
us to desire convenient and predictable lives. Just as we can rest assured that
a Big Mac will taste the same whether we eat it in California,
Pennsylvania or Budapest, we've come to want the other parts
of our lives to be as routine and controlled.
We get what we wish for in the utterly predictable political conventions.
Pundits and reporters will do their best over the next two weeks to try to
scare up some exciting, unpredictable story lines in Denver and Minneapolis-St. Paul. But let's
face it, barring the terrible or the miraculous, both conclaves will be as
exciting, original and as good for you as a Big Mac.












