Few places hold as much symbolic power for presidential
speechmaking as Berlin.
So it’s little surprise that Barack Obama chose this city for his first major
foray onto the global stage.
But if the West was united in 1963 when John F. Kennedy offered a lacerating
indictment of communism and in 1987 when Ronald Reagan demanded that Mikhail
Gorbachev tear down the Berlin Wall, today the trans-Atlantic alliance is
teetering, with genuine and serious divisions between Europe and the United States.
To bridge these fissures, Mr. Obama returned to the same language he has
used to try to bridge the partisan divide in America. In fact, his first major
overseas speech on Thursday was not dissimilar to the ones he delivered in high
school gymnasiums and town hall meetings in the United States. As a reflection of
his call for post-partisan politics, it was classic Barack Obama.
Back during the Democratic primaries, it was more than a message of change
that spurred Mr. Obama’s political rise, it was his vision of a united America
coming together to solve common challenges — a call reminiscent of Ronald
Reagan’s pledge nearly 30 years ago to “make America great again.” Indeed, Mr.
Obama’s message then was as much about bridging the divisions between
blue-state and red-state America
as it was about his policy prescriptions for providing universal health care or
fixing a broken economy. In Berlin,
he took this nonpartisan populist message and repackaged it for the rest of the
world.
During the last few months, Mr. Obama has strayed somewhat from these
themes, focusing more on the back and forth of daily politics and less on what
George H. W. Bush deridingly called the “vision thing.” But it returned with a vengeance
yesterday in the German capital.
When Mr. Obama won the Iowa
caucus last January, he declared:
This was the moment when we tore down barriers that
have divided us for too long; when we rallied people of all parties and ages to
a common cause.
He optimistically told voters:
Hope is the bedrock of this nation. The belief that
our destiny will not be written for us, but by us, by all those men and women
who are not content to settle for the world as it is, who have the courage to
remake the world as it should be.
His message in Germany
was similar:
We cannot afford to be divided. No one nation, no
matter how large or powerful, can defeat such challenges alone. None of us can
deny these threats, or escape responsibility in meeting them.
Especially when he concluded:
People of Berlin
— and people of the world — the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead
will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for
freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. With an eye toward the future,
with resolve in our hearts, let us remember this history, and answer our
destiny, and remake the world once again.
On a host of issues that have divided Europe and the United States — from
the war on terror and Iran’s nuclear program to climate change and the
challenges of free trade and globalization — Mr. Obama called on all sides to
work together in common purpose:
In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike
will be required to do more --not less. Partnership and cooperation among
nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common
security and advance our common humanity.
Whether one shares Mr. Obama’s vision of cooperation is something else
altogether. Some might argue that he has left himself open to the sort of
attacks that he faced in the Democratic primary, namely that he is being naïve
and glossing over real ideological and policy-oriented differences. The
divisions between the United
States and its European allies are not
simply a result of President Bush’s unilateralist ways, but reflect significant
trans-Atlantic divisions (ones that will not necessarily be glossed over should
Mr. Obama win in November).
But after eight years of frayed relations between the United States and Europe,
Mr. Obama seems to believe that a doctrine of post-partisan, solution-oriented
politics at home and abroad is his best bet for both policy and political
success. An emerging Obama Doctrine is becoming clearer: it is the culture in Washington and the
nation’s sharp partisan divides that must be healed before real legislative and
policy change can occur. And Mr. Obama seems to believe that a similar approach
can be used to bridge global divisions, achieve consensus on the nature of the
challenges (which Mr. Obama tried to lay out in Berlin) and then seek solutions
through partnership and compromise and not unilateralism. The current president
ran on “being a uniter, not a divider,” but Mr. Obama seems intent to follow
through on those words.
Yesterday’s speech was primarily intended for a European audience; the crowd
of 200,000 in Berlin
combined with the backdrop of a setting sun were fantastic props in his
campaign for the White House. But beyond the stagecraft, for Americans curious
to know what type of campaign Mr. Obama will be running in the fall and what
type of president he hopes to be, his remarks were a good preview of things to
come. For better or worse, “change we can believe in” is back.