Let's be honest. If Al Gore's selection of a Jew as his running
mate costs him votes, it's not going to be with Southern rednecks,
who weren't going to vote for him anyway--or with evangelicals,
who seem to like Joe Lieberman's religiosity. It's going to be
with African-Americans.
This is a hard thing to contemplate or talk about so let's start
with two caveats. Most blacks are not anti-Semitic, and even those
who are might not like George W. Bush any better.
The question is whether there are enough blacks who do think
this way to turn the election.
I can think of at least one. Lee Alcorn, president of the Dallas
NAACP, told a local radio station: "I think we need to be very
suspicious of any kind of partnerships between the Jews at that
kind of level, because we know that their interest primarily has
to do with money and these kind of things." The NAACP national
office condemned his remarks.
But let's just say Alcorn is not the only black in America to
hold those kinds of views. The Joint Center for Political Studies,
which studies black voting patterns, found that 37.1% of blacks
feel that "Jews have too much power in the United States." Only
19.5% of whites answered yes to that question. A 1996 Gallup survey
asked whether "liberal Jews are to blame for much of what is wrong
with America." Blacks were far more likely than whites to say
yes (the group most likely to say yes, intriguingly, was Jews).
According to the Anti-Defamation League, blacks are three times
more likely to hold anti-Semitic views than whites.
Blacks may also be nervous to the extent they view Lieberman
as a Clinton basher. "No one loves Clinton more than blacks,"
says Dr. David Bositis, a senior policy analyst at the Joint Center
for Political and Economic Studies, a black-issues D.C. think
tank. "Why shouldn't they see Lieberman as a slap at Clinton?
Maybe that's something to worry about. On the other hand, he's
pious, and blacks are very religious."
But the biggest source of resentment may be a sense that it shoulda
been one of us.
On July 24, well before the official dis of Lieberman's selection,
BlackElectorate.com ran an emblematic editorial titled: "Al Gore
Looks for a Vice-President--Blacks Need Not Apply." "To consider
that in nearly 70 years of party loyalty a Black has not received
the Democratic Party's nomination for vice-president is even more
stunning when one reflects over the fact that for almost a year,
Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, a Mexican-American, was rumored
to be a leading candidate to become Al Gore's running mate, and
that just last week it was reported that Gore's top choice for
vice president is former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, a Jewish-American.
But no Black has been seriously considered for the position during
campaign 2000," it read.
A. Asadullah Samad, writing in politicallyblack.com, fumed, "No
blacks, No Latinos, No Asians, No 'serious' women candidates.
It appears that the revenge of the 'Angry White male' has succeeded
in convincing these two Presidential candidates that choosing
an ethnic or woman is 'too risky' in this election.... The heartland
aint ready for a black vice president."
Notice what's implicit in this formulation: A minority should,
by right, have been chosen, and blacks deserve to have been chosen
before other minorities. They've earned it with "all of the years
of undying loyalty, [but] have never witnessed as much as even
one of their own as a vice-presidential nominee," harumphs that
editorial.
If that's so--blacks had it coming--then what went wrong? Racism?
According to Askia Muhammad--White House correspondent for The
Final Call, the newspaper of The Nation of Islam--the black political
class itself dropped the ball on getting blacks on the short,
or even long, list of VP hopefuls. Citing sources in the Congressional
Black Caucus, Muhammad says, "blacks on the Hill were so busy
with their own affairs, that just never happened." Muhammad says
one CBC member admitted that "we just didn't politic it." Even
that angry editorial concedes as much. "In October of 1998, while
a guest on Meet The Press, Rev. Jesse Jackson told...Tim Russert,
that a Black 'should be on the ticket' in the year 2000. Yet he
and other Blacks have done next to nothing to advance the Reverend's
stated position."
More to the point, however, may be the lack of viable black candidates
for the No. 2. "Who should have been nominated? There's no black
officials of national prominence who are electable," explains
Bositis. "Regardless of what black leaders did or didn't do, name
a [black] person who could have been elected Vice President. John
Lewis? No. Sheila Jackson-Lee? No. Maxine Waters? No. Can you
think of any one?"
No, though some don't want to face that fact. Blacks, liberals,
and Democrats have made much of the GOP convention's "illusion
of inclusion," where a body of delegates who were nearly 90% white
(one in five a millionaire) watched often-obscure minorities placed
center stage. Lamenting the unrelieved exclusion of blacks from
the presidential ticket, one commentator argued that, "On the
Republican side, this comes as no surprise."
Yet it's the Republicans who have literally begged Colin Powell
to run either for president or vice president. Had he, assures
Bositis, "He'd have strolled all the way to the White House. Both
he and Condoleeza Rice will have highly visible, meaningful Cabinet
roles in a Bush White House. There's just no room for complaint.
You simply cannot say that no one wants African Americans on a
Presidential ticket. Gore didn't choose one because there wasn't
one to choose." (Indeed, according to The New York Times, Gore
too approached Powell but was rebuffed.)
The Democrats' secret fear is not that they will switch en masse
to the party of Lincoln. "No one's worried that blacks will vote
Republican because of Leiberman or anything else," says Bositis.
"The only real fear is that they might stay home." If blacks don't
vote, Gore will be in real trouble.
According to the Joint Center, only 8.3% of blacks identify as
Republican. Gore will need 90% of the black vote to win in November.
Notice the lack of wiggle room between these two figures.
Leading black politicians obviously recognize this, which is
why Jesse Jackson came out with such a forceful statement that
Lieberman's selection opens doors to all blacks. Jackson must
be aware that if Lieberman is perceived as having harmed the ticket,
a Democratic candidate would have to think long and hard before
choosing another minority as a running mate.
Copyright 2000, Beliefnet
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.
Your tax-deductible gift will help bring promising new voices and ideas into our nation's discourse, and help shape the future of vital public policies.
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.