To justify a new increase in military pay, the Pentagon and legislators are citing a 13
percent "pay gap" between the salaries of servicemen and their civilian
counterparts. Ignoring for a moment whether a dramatic increase in military pay is needed,
the 13 percent figure is bogus. Even though the Congressional Budget Office debunked the
statistic in March, several military representatives continue to cite it in congressional
testimony.
The 13 percent "pay gap" represents the difference in the growth of
military versus civilian wages since 1982--that is, civilian wages have grown 13 percent
faster. This does not mean that soldiers earn less than civilians, because it does
not take into account the pay differential from 1982. If my wages have increased by 100
percent during the past five years while Bill Gates' have increased by nearly 50 percent,
this does not mean that I am earning 50 percent more than Bill Gates, since he was making
more to begin with.
Moreover, even as a measure of relative wage growth, the 13 percent figure fails.
First, the 1982 starting point--as opposed to some other year--makes the gap look
especially big, since there was a substantial military pay increase in 1981. Even worse,
the comparison does not account for the fact that most members of the armed forces are
younger and less educated than civilian workers. This is important because in recent years
the wages of college-educated workers have grown much faster than the wages of
high-school-educated workers. The better comparison would be between the wage growth of
soldiers and civilians of comparable age and education.
So forget about 13 percent argument. Is there any pay gap? A rough study by the CBO
found that enlisted service members earned higher wages than three-quarters of male
civilian high-school graduates of the same age, and officers earn higher wages than
three-quarters of college graduates of the same age. By that measure, soldiers earn more
than their civilian counterparts. A RAND study has found essentially similar results.
Military service offers many advantages--self-improvement, adventure, travel,
patriotism, the esteem of one's countrymen--as the services tout. It also has severe
disadvantages, such as long hours, harsh discipline, isolation from loved ones, and the
risk of injury or death. It may be a good idea to attract better soldiers, sailors, and
airmen with huge salary increases, but military service is so different from civilian work
that most wage comparisons are extremely suspect.
Copyright 1999, Slate
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.
Your tax-deductible gift will help bring promising new voices and ideas into our nation's discourse, and help shape the future of vital public policies.
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.