IRV in Action
Ranked-choice voting systems are currently being used with great success in the United States and around the world. San Francisco passed Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) in 2002, and has now used the system in two city-wide elections. Voters adapted to RCV very quickly and in exit polls have expressed great support for the system. Burlington, VT used IRV earlier this year to elect its Mayor. IRV is also used at the state level in Louisiana, Arkansas, and South Carolina, where overseas military voters can rank candidates on their absentee ballots, allowing them to take part in runoff elections.
Interest in IRV is spreading throughout the U.S. The North Carolina senate recently voted to start using IRV in judicial elections throughout the state and at the same time create an IRV pilot program in ten cities and ten counties. At the city level, IRV has passed in Ferndale, MI, Takoma Park, MD, and Berkeley, CA. Ranked-choice voting was approved by voters in November 2006 in Oakland, CA, Davis, CA, Pierce County, WA, and Minneapolis, MN.
Many college students are already familiar with IRV, as it is used for student body elections at over thirty colleges and universities around the United States, including institutions such as Dartmouth, Harvard, Princeton, MIT, CalTech, UCLA, UC Berkeley, and Stanford. Furthermore, a number of organizations -- including the American Political Science Association and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences -- use Instant Runoff Voting.
Though IRV is a new reform in many U.S. communities, cities and countries around the world have used ranked choice voting systems for decades. The Republic of Ireland has used IRV to elect its president since 1922. Australia has used ranked voting to elect its House of Representatives since 1949 and to elect most state and territory lower houses. Malta has used IRV to elect its president since 1921. Ranked voting is also used in London, Scotland and New Zealand.
Outside Reading
A number of excellent studies have been conducted on the recent use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San Francisco. The below studies provide information on voter turnout, understanding, and satisfaction in San Francisco's 2004 and 2005 elections:
- An Assessment of Ranked-Choice Voting in the San Francisco 2004 Election
- An Assessment of Ranked-Choice Voting in the San Francisco 2005 Election
- Ranked Choice Voting and Voter Turnout in San Francisco Elections
- Exit Polls show that Asian voters used ranked choice voting extensively in San Francisco District 4 Supervisor race
Articles
| Article | Date |
|---|---|
| The Groundhog Day Election In Los Angeles | June 23, 2008 |
| How Ed Jew Got Elected | June 24, 2007 |
| No Way to Run an Election | May 17, 2007 |
| France's Election Flaw | April 25, 2007 |
| Catching on to Instant Runoff Voting | January 14, 2007 |
Policy Papers
| Title | Date |
|---|---|
| Voter Education and Outreach in San Francisco to Implement IRV | June 2007 |
| Instant Runoff Voting for the City of Los Angeles | April 2007 |
| Instant Runoff Voting | February 2007 |
| Instant Runoff Voting: Making Your Vote Count | July 2006 |
Events
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| CA Event: Instant Runoff Voting in Los Angeles | June 2, 2008 |
| CA Event: Instant Runoff Voting and Minorities in L.A. | April 19, 2008 |
| California Event: Alternative Voting Systems | April 26, 2007 |
| Ten Big Ideas for a New America | January 31, 2007 |




