<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Proportional Representation: Publications, Events and More</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/content/854/all</link>
 <description>Program-Related content, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>California&#039;s Electoral System Needs Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2009/californias_electoral_system_needs_reform</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;Media Contact&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Liz Wu&lt;br /&gt;
California Media Relations Manager&lt;br /&gt;
510-295-9859&lt;br /&gt;
wu@newamerica.net&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SACRAMENTO, CA - In the wake of Tuesday&#039;s record low voter turnout and the resounding defeat of five of six ballot measures proposed by the Legislature, the New America Foundation renewed its call for a fundamental overhaul of California&#039;s dysfunctional electoral system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2009/californias_electoral_system_needs_reform&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/blair_bobier/recent_work">Blair Bobier</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_paul/recent_work">Mark Paul</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/854">Proportional Representation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/853">Universal Voter Registration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth Wu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13807 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New America Foundation in the Sacramento Bee on Growing Political Middle</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/walters_sacaramento_bee</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last month&amp;#39;s election provided new evidence that while politicians from the two major parties fight their shrill ideological battles -- egged on by radio and cable television talkers -- they represent ever-shrinking constituencies and thus are becoming increasingly disconnected from the larger society.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The political middle, disenchanted with the confrontational and ultimately meaningless tone of contemporary politics, has been growing. The number of voters who register as Republicans or Democrats in California has remained unchanged for a decade and a half while the ranks of independent voters have swelled to nearly a fifth of the total...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s why, for instance, California&amp;#39;s two major parties, which agree on practically nothing in the policy realm, joined arms to successfully challenge voter-approved open primary elections. Open primaries would allow cross-party voters and independents to make decisions on party nominees, thereby threatening the stranglehold of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans on their parties&amp;#39; dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And that&amp;#39;s why leaders of the two major parties in the Legislature conspired after the 2000 census to redraw 173 legislative and congressional districts to designate each district&amp;#39;s party ownership, minimize interparty competition and make the closed party primary the vehicle for electing officeholders...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Opening up California&amp;#39;s political process by breaking up the partisan&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2006/walters_sacaramento_bee&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/263">Sacramento Bee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/700">Instant Runoff Voting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/854">Proportional Representation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4490 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Proportional Voting</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/proportional_voting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Overview.&lt;/strong&gt; California’s representative government is plagued by an unprecedented number of noncompetitive elections. The Legislature is highly partisan because over 90 percent of legislative districts strongly favor one political party over the other. Incumbents are not accountable to voters and act without fear of losing re-election. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/proportional_voting&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/21">Political Reform Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/854">Proportional Representation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Proportional Voting.pdf" length="64185" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4428 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Citizens Assembly</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/citizens_assembly</link>
 <description>  &lt;h3&gt;The Problem &lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;p&gt;A number of promising reforms have been proposed for making the California political system more representative and responsive— from independent redistricting, term limits, and open primaries to more modern electoral systems and public financing of campaigns—but all face the same obstacle:  entrenched interests, including elected lawmakers, who benefit from the status quo. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;One means of removing partisanship and incumbent protectionism from the political reform process is known as a Citizens Assembly, which convenes a body of average citizens empowered to formally propose electoral reforms that politicians have too strong a conflict of interest to propose themselves. Already successfully employed in British Columbia, California’s legislature is now considering a Citizen Assembly measure of its own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;The British Columbia Model&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The Citizens Assembly in British Columbia was established by the legislature, with a mandate to focus on electoral reform. The assembly&amp;#39;s 160 members were chosen by a random selection process, just like a jury pool. First there was a draw of 100 men and 100 women from all of the province&amp;#39;s 79 electoral districts, asking how many would agree to serve. Eventually one man and one woman were selected from each of the 79 districts, and two more members were added to ensure representation of native Canadians, a total of 160 members.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;The Assembly&amp;#39;s tenure was divided into three phases: first, learning about reform from noted experts, January-March 2004; second, over 50 public hearings, May-June; and third, final deliberations, Sept-Nov. They met on weekends, their expenses and a per diem of about $1000 per month paid by the government. They were addressed by top experts from all political perspectives who gave them the benefit of their knowledge and analysis.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;Nearly 11 months later in December 2004 the Assembly delivered its final report. It voted 146-7 to toss out its longtime winner-take-all, single-seat district electoral system and replace it with a proportional representation system. &amp;quot;This really is power to the people,&amp;quot; stated Jack Blaney, the chair of the Citizens Assembly.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;For the &lt;a href=&quot;/files/Citizens%20Assembly.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;complete paper&lt;/a&gt;, please see the attached PDF version below. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/34">Citizens Assembly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/854">Proportional Representation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Citizens Assembly.pdf" length="52372" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Political Reform</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4426 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
