<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative: Latest Articles</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/content/1267/articles</link>
 <description>Articles by Program for tabbed view on main program pages</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Now Who Loves America More? It&#039;s Not the GOP</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/now_who_loves_america_more_its_not_gop_18788</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Twenty-five years
ago, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Jeane Kirkpatrick famously
lambasted Democrats as &amp;quot;blame America firsters&amp;quot; and a party plagued by
&amp;quot;self-criticism and self-denigration&amp;quot; of America. It was a speech at
pace with an emerging political stereotype that suggested Democrats
weren&#039;t quite patriotic enough and didn&#039;t love their country as much as
Republicans did. This image of Democratic weakness and self-doubt
became one of the most effective attack lines for Republicans -- and
Democrats&#039; greatest political liability. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/now_who_loves_america_more_its_not_gop_18788&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1320">Politico</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18788 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McChrystal&#039;s Full-Court Press on Afghanistan Is Improper</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/mcchrystals_full_court_press_afghanistan_improper_18398</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Civilian control of the armed forces is one of the most sacrosanct
tenets of American democracy. It assures us that military
decision-making will be subordinate to the larger strategic perspective
of our nation&#039;s elected -- and ultimately accountable -- leaders.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/mcchrystals_full_court_press_afghanistan_improper_18398&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/338">New York Daily News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Drankoski</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18398 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Powell Doctrine&#039;s Enduring Relevance</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/powell_doctrines_enduring_relevance_16158</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Once upon a time, there was a grand and influential foreign policy doctrine. It
was based on some traditional notions about U.S.
statecraft that placed severe constraints on when America went to war. It asserted
that when the United States
used military force, it must do so in overwhelming fashion and only in the
service of vital national interests. For any military action, it counseled the
dispassionate weighing of costs and benefits, recommended that policymakers
have clear, realistic and achievable political objectives, and called for the
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/powell_doctrines_enduring_relevance_16158&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1323">World Politics Review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cecille Isidro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16158 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where the Real Fight Is</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/where_real_fight_15973</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The conventional wisdom in Washington --
and the core of U.S. President Barack Obama&#039;s &amp;quot;Af-Pak&amp;quot; policy, which
he announced in March -- is that Afghanistan is now the central
front in the conflict formerly known as the war on terror. Pakistan is essential too, of course, and
indeed, the thinking goes, you can&#039;t have a successful Afghanistan policy without a successful Pakistan
policy. The problem with this conventional wisdom is that it gets the situation
entirely backward: The real fight is in Pakistan,
not Afghanistan,
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/where_real_fight_15973&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/104">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cecille Isidro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15973 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Momentum Key for Health Care Bill</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/momemntum_key_health_care_bill_15092</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Throughout the 2008 presidential campaign, the one criticism heard perhaps more than any other from Republicans was about the cult of veneration that had developed around Barack Obama. He was the “second coming,” the Democrats’ “messiah,” a preening “celebrity,” the political ads joked. But the GOP might have been on to something. For Democrats and their ambitious domestic agenda, it’s all about Obama. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/momemntum_key_health_care_bill_15092&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1320">Politico</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cecille Isidro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15092 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
