<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Strategic Toolbox: Publications, Events and More</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/content/1266/all</link>
 <description>Program-Related content, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Custodians of Empire | CBS News</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/custodians_empire_cbs_news</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
The essence of the matter is simple enough, as Frida Berrigan, arms expert for the New America Foundation and TomDispatch regular, indicates in her latest ...&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/771">CBS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:32:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8513 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative Report on Reuters | &#039;Report Urges Military from Private Security Personnel&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/privatization_foreign_policy_initiative_report_reuters_report_urges_military_private_security_personnel</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
The U.S. military has long used private contractors in fighting its wars, but Washington&#039;s reliance on non-uniformed civilians has sharply increased over the past five years, the New America Foundation said in a new report. LINK
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/921">Reuters</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:53:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8417 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Michael A. Cohen in Government Executive | &#039;Report Urges Military to Move Away from Private Security Personnel&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/michael_cohen_government_executive_report_urges_military_move_away_private_security_personnel</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Pentagon today is completely reliant on contractors to complete their core mission,&amp;quot; said Michael Cohen, a senior research fellow at New America Foundation and co-author of the report. &amp;quot;There has been no long-term planning and thinking.&amp;quot; LINK
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/990">Government Executive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8416 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Has the Privatization of National Security Gone Too Far?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/private_military_contractors</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
11/14/2008 - 9:30am&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While the U.S. military has long relied on private contractors, the outsourcing of key national security functions has increased dramatically in recent years. From intelligence gathering and logistical support to personal security services, training, and operational support tasks, the efforts of contractors are now integral to the success of America&#039;s security and stabilization missions around the world. Since the beginning of the Iraq War, one dollar out of every five has been spent on private contractors and by most estimates,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/events/2008/private_military_contractors&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/557">Audio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/558">Video</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/naf111408a.mp3" length="17416338" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8340 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Changing the Culture of Pentagon Contracting</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/changing_culture_pentagon_contracting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
While the U.S.
military has long relied on private contractors, the outsourcing of key
national security functions has increased dramatically over the past five and a
half years. From intelligence gathering and logistical support to personal
security services, training, and operational support tasks, the efforts of
contractors are now integral to the success of America&#039;s security and
stabilization missions around the world. Since the beginning of the Iraq War,
one dollar out of every five has been spent on private contractors. By most
estimates, there are more private contractors in Iraq than uniformed military. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Numerous
observers have raised questions about the legal accountability of contractors
and the efficacy of utilizing private actors in an active battle space, but few
studies have examined the culture of contracting and the larger failure of the
military to effectively account for and integrate contractors into U.S.
military planning, training, and operations. This report in intended to help
policymakers, both in the executive and legislative branches as well as the
uniformed military, develop solutions to the growing challenge of integrating
contractors more effectively into U.S. national security operations. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A failure to accept the inevitability of contractors
as a key element of the military force structure has contributed to inertia and
an abdication of responsibility for managing the interaction between government
departments and private contractors. While it is important to acknowledge that
in recent years there have been significant improvements in oversight of
private contractors, particularly by the Department of Defense, serious
systemic and institutional problems persist.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A cultural shift
is required in which civilian and military leaders take steps to fully
integrate private contractors not only into the force structure but also into
mission requirements. Without this sort of institutional change, the problems
we have experienced in connection with contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan will continue,
significantly retarding the military&#039;s ability to adjust to the evolving
security challenges of the 21st century. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The U.S.
government should:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Transition away from the use of private security
	contractors in the battle space and build up the capabilities of the State
	Department&#039;s Bureau of Diplomatic Security and the military police to take
	on security responsibilities. As this transition takes place, the Military
	Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act should be expanded to govern the actions
	of private security contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan not currently
	covered by the Uniform Code of Military Justice; improved training of
	security contractors, vetting of third-country nationals, and third-party
	accreditation of contractors should be instituted; and interagency
	coordination between the military and other government agencies should be
	strengthened. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Move away from reliance on the flawed and widely
	misunderstood term &amp;quot;inherently governmental&amp;quot; in deciding how and when to
	use private contractors, and instead focus on the question of core
	competencies and mission success. Congress should permit government
	agencies to use broad discretionary leeway in determining where and how
	contractors should be used. Congress should establish red-lined activities
	that must not be outsourced and require the military to maintain a
	&amp;quot;resident capacity&amp;quot; for any function it outsources, particularly as it
	relates to the ability to conduct proper contractual oversight. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Designate a high-ranking official in each branch
	of the military to conduct a top-to-bottom review of how that branch
	interacts with contractors and where there are areas for greater or lesser
	reliance on contractors. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Strengthen the contractor and acquisition
	workforce so that it is better equipped to make contracting decisions and
	to conduct robust oversight and management of contractors. In addition,
	the Army should develop and support its newly created contracting career
	field for enlisted personnel and officers. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Create a clear chain of command from Secretary of
	Defense through the Joint Chiefs of Staff and service departments that
	lays out the responsibilities for contracting and holds commanders
	accountable for the integration of contractors into the Total Force.
	&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Integrate contractor oversight into officer
	training in all branches of the military. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Include contingency contracting as an &amp;quot;area of
	emphasis&amp;quot; in the 2010 QDR. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Create and sustain an enforcement arm of the FBI
	to conduct overseas investigations of private contractors as well as an
	extraterritorial U.S.
	attorney to prosecute criminal behavior. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maria_figueroa_kupcu/recent_work">Maria Figueroa Küpçü</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Changing the Culture of Pentagon Contracting.pdf" length="7236943" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8263 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Frida Berrigan in the Arizona Daily Star | &#039; Tucson Airmen Part of US Push to Create Good Will in Latin America&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/frida_berrigan_arizona_daily_star_tucson_airmen_part_us_push_create_good_will_latin_america</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;

&amp;quot;There&#039;s certainly nothing wrong with increasing good will and
promoting partnerships,&amp;quot; said Frida Berrigan of the Washington,
D.C.-based think tank New America Foundation, who has spent 10 years
studying Latin America.


 


But leaving that job almost totally up to the military &amp;quot;highlights
the profound imbalance in our foreign engagement, in the way we
interact with other countries,&amp;quot; she said. LINK
 

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1500">Arizona Daily Star</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/latin_america">Latin America</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8231 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Too Many Guns</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/too_many_guns_8236</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We&#039;ve heard a lot about gun control and the second amendment
in this election season. A McCain-Palin poster, featuring Alaska&#039;s 44-year-old
governor with a big gun and the viewer in her rifle sights, is just one of the
more graphic indications that gun control is a lightning-rod issue that
distracts, distorts, and dismays. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
More than 200 years after our founding fathers enshrined the
right to &amp;quot;bear arms&amp;quot; in our Constitution, we have more arms than we
can bear. Wars are fought, fortunes are made, and nations&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/too_many_guns_8236&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1055">Foreign Policy in Focus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8236 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Wake of Wall Street Bailout, Stop Bailing Out the Arms Industry</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/wake_wall_street_bailout_stop_bailing_out_arms_industry_8216</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of the many concerns that went unaddressed in the first two
presidential debates between John McCain and Barack Obama, one of the most
important was the question of how each candidate would adjust his policy plans
to accommodate the impending $700 billion bailout of Wall Street.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Neither candidate has given a terribly persuasive answer.
Obama talked about the possibility of slowing down an initiative here or a
program there; and in the October 2nd vice presidential debate, Democratic
vice-presidential nominee Joseph Biden followed up with one specific&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/wake_wall_street_bailout_stop_bailing_out_arms_industry_8216&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1055">Foreign Policy in Focus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/bailout">Bailout</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8216 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NYC EVENT: Home Fronts</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/home_fronts</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
10/14/2008 - 6:30pm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please join us for a reception and discussion on the recently published Home Fronts: A Wartime America Reader, with editors Michael S. Foley and Brendan P. O&#039;Malley.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Home Fronts is a wide-ranging and long overdue collection.  From the war with Spain to the war on terror, Foley and O&#039;Malley reveal the intricate connections between overseas conflicts and American social, economic, political, and cultural history.&amp;quot;
-- Andrew J. Huebner, Professor of History, University of Alabama, and author of The&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/events/2008/home_fronts&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8067 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An Unstoppable Arms Trade?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/unstoppable_arms_trade_8265</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At first glance, the international arms trade seems to be
one of those problems that will always be with us, like death and taxes. But
just as life can be prolonged and tax rates can be reduced, the traffic in
weapons can be reined in, given the political will to do so, as I first suggested
in two contributions to World Policy Journal-- the first, &amp;quot;Curbing the Arms
Trade: From Rhetoric to Restraint&amp;quot; in the spring of 1992, and &amp;quot;Why Sell Arms?&amp;quot; a
year later.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Not much&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/unstoppable_arms_trade_8265&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/185">World Policy Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8265 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>William D. Hartung in Bloomberg News | &#039;U.S. Exported $33.7 Billion in Arms, Most in 15 Years&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_bloomberg_news_u_s_exported_33_7_billion_arms_most_15_years</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
``The last big surge was after the first Gulf War&#039;&#039; against Iraq in 1991, when the U.S. helped countries in the region upgrade their military, William Hartung, an arms analyst for the Washington-based New America Foundation, said in an interview.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
``It&#039;s possible that a quarter to one-third of this year&#039;s sales could be arming up Iraq, and with the oil price rise, Gulf states can afford to make purchases,&#039;&#039; said Hartung, who is based in New York. LINK
&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_bloomberg_news_u_s_exported_33_7_billion_arms_most_15_years&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/925">Bloomberg News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8056 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>William D. Hartung in CorpWatch | &#039;One Million Weapons to Iraq; Many Go Missing&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_corpwatch_one_million_weapons_iraq_many_go_missing</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
“It is likely that a large proportion of the hundreds of thousands of small arms and light weapons that have ‘gone missing’ in Iraq are either in the hands of anti-U.S. insurgents or in other countries, fueling conflicts there,” says William Hartung, the director of the Arms and Security Initiative of the New America Foundation. “In order to prevent similar security risks in the future, the corporate and government officials responsible for putting U.S. troops at risk by failing to&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_corpwatch_one_million_weapons_iraq_many_go_missing&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1469">CorpWatch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8022 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>William D. Hartung in The Boston Globe | &#039;Gunmaker to the World&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_boston_globe_gunmaker_world</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Arms trade expert William Hartung of the New America Foundation says US arms were used in 18 of the 25 major wars in 2006 and 2007, with weapons sold to at least a dozen regimes in developing countries that are either undemocratic or commit serious human rights abuses. These include Thailand, Ethiopia, Morocco, and Oman. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hartung says some countries join the arms race for no apparent reason. &amp;quot;Unless you think Romania is going to start bombing terrorist training camps, F-16s don&#039;t&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_boston_globe_gunmaker_world&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/114">The Boston Globe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8023 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Recession for Arms Sales</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/no_recession_arms_sales_7984</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
The CEO of a weapons manufacturer has plenty of chances to
rub elbows with deputy secretaries of defense, officials from Homeland
Security, retired military personnel, and the best and brightest of the defense
establishment almost any week of the year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
One such opportunity occurred at the ComDef 2008 conference,
which wrapped up at the National Press Club in Washington on September 3. Sponsored by
weapons giants like Boeing, Raytheon, and BAE Systems, the day-long conference
was organized around the theme of &amp;quot;Defense Priorities in an&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/no_recession_arms_sales_7984&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1055">Foreign Policy in Focus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7984 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Pentagon&#039;s Cubicle Mercenaries</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/pentagons_cubicle_mercenaries_7923</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Seven years into George W Bush&#039;s global &amp;quot;war on terror&amp;quot;, the Pentagon is embroiled in two big wars, a potentially explosive war of words with Tehran, and numerous smaller conflicts -- and it is leaning ever more heavily on private military contractors to get by. 

Once upon a time, soldiers did more than pick up a gun. They picked up trash. They cut hair and delivered mail. They fixed airplanes and inflated truck tires. 

Not anymore.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/pentagons_cubicle_mercenaries_7923&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/341">Asia Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7923 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>William D. Hartung in The New York Times | &#039;With White House Push, U.S. Arms Sales Jump&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/william_d_hartung_new_york_times_white_house_push_u_s_arms_sales_jump</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The growing tally of international weapon deals, which started to
surge in 2006, is now provoking questions among some advocates of arms
control and some members of Congress. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
“Sure, this is a quick
and easy way to cement alliances,” said William D. Hartung, an arms
control specialist at the New America Foundation, a public policy
institute. “But this is getting out of hand.” LINK
 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7939 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Contractors Shouldn&#039;t Face Iraqi Courts</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/u_s_contractors_shouldnt_face_iraqi_courts_7791</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;times&quot;&gt;
Nearly a year after the tragic shooting of 17 Iraqis by
Blackwater security contractors, the Department of Justice is close to
indicting six of the guards involved in the horrific events. This is a long
overdue step toward holding contractors legally responsible for their actions
in Iraq and Afghanistan.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;times&quot;&gt;
But this positive move risks being overshadowed by a more
destabilizing development: the apparent agreement, as part of U.S.-Iraqi Status
of Forces Agreement negotiations, to revoke the immunity from Iraqi law that
private security contractors have enjoyed&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/u_s_contractors_shouldnt_face_iraqi_courts_7791&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maria_figueroa_kupcu/recent_work">Maria Figueroa Küpçü</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1297">Wall Street Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7791 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to Stay in Iraq for 1,000 Years</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/how_stay_iraq_1_000_years_7789</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Few Americans had ever heard of a SOFA until earlier this year, when the
Internet lit up with a revelation many observers of US foreign policy had long
predicted. Despite repeated claims to the contrary, US officials were pressing
the Iraqi government to accept an indefinite US military presence,
including--and here was the shocker--up to 58 American bases on Iraqi turf.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;-moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; background-attachment: scroll&quot;&gt;
The term SOFA, shorthand
for Status of Forces Agreement, was suddenly all over the news. The countries
have&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/how_stay_iraq_1_000_years_7789&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/frida_berrigan/recent_work">Frida Berrigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/81">Mother Jones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7789 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>William Hartung on Democracy Now | &#039;Tensions High as NATO Suspends Formal Contacts with Russia Over Georgia Conflict&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/william_hartung_democracy_now_tensions_high_nato_suspends_formal_contacts_russia_over_georgia_conflict</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News: &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
Tensions are high between the United States and Russia over the ongoing
conflict in Georgia. On Wednesday, soon after NATO foreign ministers
decided to cut formal ties with Russia until it withdrew all its troops
from Georgia, President Bush vowed to continue to support Georgia. We
speak with William Hartung, director of the Arms and Security
Initiative at the New America Foundation. LINK to video and audio
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/724">Democracy Now</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/georgia">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7801 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Pentagon&#039;s New Strategy: Show Us the Money</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/pentagons_new_strategy_show_us_money_7735</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At first glance, the new national defense strategy released by Secretary of
Defense Robert Gates recently looks like a new start, with much talk of working
with allies and -- heaven forbid -- even other US government agencies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Gates comes across as the &amp;quot;anti-Rumsfeld,&amp;quot; replacing his
predecessor&#039;s bluster with quiet diplomacy, and an overreliance on military
force with a more pragmatic, balanced approach to security. The new strategy
document reflects these differences.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is not the first time that Gates has embraced the themes set out in&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/pentagons_new_strategy_show_us_money_7735&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/114">The Boston Globe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:48:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7735 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
