<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Transnational Issues: Publications, Events and More</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/programs/content/1264/all</link>
 <description>Program-Related content, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna in The San Diego Union Tribune | &#039;Foreign Oil Producers Have U.S. Over Barrel &#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_san_diego_union_tribune_foreign_oil_producers_have_u_s_over_barrel</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“The oil centers in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain have been investing
in economic growth in places without much oil, such as Egypt, Morocco
and Jordan,” said &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt;, director of the &lt;strong&gt;Global Governance Initiative&lt;/strong&gt; at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20080824-9999-1n24oil.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/70">The San Diego Union Tribune</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7818 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wrong on Russia</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/wrong_russia_7777</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the wake of Russia’s
military incursion into Georgia,
too many current, former, and aspiring U.S. officials are caricaturing the
Russian state that was shaped and is still guided by Vladimir Putin as a
revisionist aggressor. For Robert Kagan, John McCain’s neoconservative foreign
policy adviser, as well as for long-time Democratic foreign policy hands
Richard Holbrooke and Ronald Asmus, Russia’s
actions in Georgia are
comparable to Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1938. For
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Russia’s
actions are more reminiscent of the Soviet Union’s invasion of Czechoslovakia
in 1968.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But, in reality, today’s Russia
is not a resurgent imperial power. In the post-Cold War period, it was Washington, not Moscow,
which&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/wrong_russia_7777&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/894">The National Interest Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/european_union">Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/georgia">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7777 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett on MSNBC&#039;s Countdown with Keith Olbermann | &#039;Another War for Bush to Consider&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_msnbcs_countdown_keith_olbermann_another_war_bush_consider</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Former Senior Director at the National Security Council and current Senior Fellow at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Flynt Leverett&lt;/strong&gt;, discusses how President Bush should handle Russia&#039;s invasion of Georgia, a U.S. ally. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26146118#26146118&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to video&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/909">MSNBC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/georgia">Georgia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/russia">Russia</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:02:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7741 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna on CNN | &#039;The Situation Room: U.S. Fears for Pakistan&#039;s Future&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_cnn_situation_room_u_s_fears_pakistans_future</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;PARAG KHANNA, NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION:&lt;/strong&gt; And some of the militant elements
in the tribal areas have also become quite strong in the interim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZAIN VERJEE, CNN STATE DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENT: Publicly, the U.S. says the impeachment is an internal
Pakistani matter but sent a veiled warning to its close ally,
Musharraf, not to take action that could be destabilizing to Pakistan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GONZALO GALLEGOS, DEPUTY STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESMAN: Our expectation is
that any action will be consistent with the rule of law and the
Pakistani constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
VERJEE: Musharraf could use his powers
as president to dissolve parliament, fire the prime minister and call
new elections. Musharraf has promised in the past not to repeat his
actions of last November, when he imposed a state of emergency. It&#039;s
unclear whether he would go quietly. So far, Musharraf has resisted
pressure to resign, even as his unpopularity grows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The
critical question -- whether the Pakistani military will allow the
government to humiliate and oust Musharraf, their former chief.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
KHANNA: They might actually intervene in order to prevent the crisis
from getting worse and simply force the civilian government to contend
or to be comfortable or simply allow Musharraf to stay in power in
exchange for the parliament not being dissolved.&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/07/sitroom.02.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;  LINK to full transcript&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/763">CNN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7725 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna on the Kojo Nnamdi Show | &#039;The Collapse WTO Negotiations&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_kojo_nnamdi_show_collapse_wto_negotiations</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
(WAMU)--It was supposed to promote &amp;quot;pro-development&amp;quot; priorities at the World Trade Organization. But the so-called &amp;quot;Doha Round&amp;quot; of talks collapsed this week, as negotiators were unable to bridge bitter divides between developed and developing countries. We find out what happened, and what it means for workers and farmers in America and the developing world. &lt;a href=&quot;http://wamu.org/audio/kn/08/07/k2080730-20295.ram&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to Audio&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Guest: &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt;, Director,
Global Governance Initiative in American Strategy Program, &lt;strong&gt;New America
Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;; author, &amp;quot;The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New
Global Order&amp;quot; (Random House)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;guest&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;guest&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1143">WAMU 88.5 FM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7669 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2008/rethinking_nuclear_weapons</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
07/24/2008 - 2:30pm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On Thursday the New America Foundation hosted &lt;strong&gt;Ward Wilson&lt;/strong&gt;, winner of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://cns.miis.edu/cns/media/pr080701_mcelvany_contest.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;2008 Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Challenge&lt;/a&gt;, to examine the underpinnings of nuclear deterrence theory.  Joined by &lt;strong&gt;Jeffrey Lewis&lt;/strong&gt;, Director of the Nuclear Strategy and Nonproliferation Initiative, Wilson challenged the belief that nuclear weapons continue to serve a useful purpose in the world. An MP3 audio recording can be downloaded below, while video is available at right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson&#039;s argument framed nuclear weapons in the context of means and ends, with the intention of demonstrating that they serve no justifiable end.  Nuclear deterrence is the belief that states can protect themselves by credibly threatening to impose unacceptable costs on an adversary in the event of an attack.  Those unacceptable costs typically entail the wholesale slaughter of an adversarys population centers (counterforce) using nuclear weapons.  Wilson challenged this fundamental component of nuclear deterrence- the efficacy of city-destruction- by examining roughly analogous historical examples, as well as the only true case studies, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson concluded that in the past city destruction has failed to bring about the end of conflict, or deter future groups from providing resistance.  In particular he argues that the Japanese, understandably, did not distinguish between the &amp;quot;rain drop&amp;quot; of Hiroshima amidst the downpour that was the U.S. strategic bombing campaign of 1945.  Combining this with the belief that nuclear weapons serve no military function that cannot be achieved with conventional weapons, Wilson determines that there is no place for nuclear weapons in the world.  Like chemical and biological weapons, nuclear weapons are useless, and should likewise be banned.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;-Nick Calluzzo, Research Intern for the Nuclear Strategy and Nonproliferation Initiative &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jeffrey_lewis/recent_work">Jeffrey Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/961">Nuclear Strategy &amp;amp; Nonproliferation Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wmd">WMD</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/557">Audio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/558">Video</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/naf072408b.mp3" length="11534091" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7468 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett on P5+1 Talks with Iran</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_p5_1_talks_iran</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Following
the P5+1 talks with Iran this past Saturday that included U.S. Under
Secretary of State William Burns, Flynt Leverett sat down to analyze the
meaning and potential of EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana&#039;s
&amp;quot;freeze-for-freeze&amp;quot; formula given recent U.S. diplomatic overtures.

Flynt Leverett is a senior fellow and director of the
Geopolitics of Energy Initiative at the New America
Foundation. Previously he served as senior director for
Middle East Affairs at the National Security Council, Middle
East expert on the Secretary of State&#039;s Policy Planning Staff, and
senior analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
To watch the video,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_p5_1_talks_iran&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iran">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7689 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett in Policy Innovations | &#039;The Rise of the Rest&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_policy_innovations_rise_rest</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;FLYNT LEVERETT:&lt;/strong&gt; ...&amp;quot;As Americans, I think we also need to face up to the flip side of the
rise of the rest, which is to some degree a decline in American
standing and influence in various international arenas. I would argue
that the United States is in an historically unprecedented condition.
It emerged from the Cold War as this unquestioned global hegemon.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now, not even two decades after the end of the Cold War, we have a situation in which the &lt;em&gt;military&lt;/em&gt;
dimension of American hegemony seems unassailable. If you look out,
even with the most optimistic projections of the growth in Chinese,
Indian, perhaps Russian, military capabilities, I would argue that the
United States is going to have a unique capacity to project large
amounts of military power around the world for at least the next two
decades, and quite possibly longer than that. So the military dimension
of American hegemony seems to be pretty intact. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are, as always, limits to what military power can do for a
hegemon. We seem periodically to need to remind ourselves of that.
Perhaps the Iraq war is one such exercise... &amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000066&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to transcript&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVRQygBgPXY&amp;amp;eurl=http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000066&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to video&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1401">Policy Innovations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7589 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Minimum Deterrence</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/minimum_deterrence_7552</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nuclear deterrence is a rather subjective concept: How many weapons are enough to ensure deterrence? How difficult is it to achieve and maintain deterrence? How important are the technical details of a country’s nuclear forces, such as the size, configuration, and readiness, to the goal of maintaining deterrence? The answers to these questions vary across recent history and across geographic areas.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One view, I would say the dominant view in U.S. defense planning, is that deterrence can be achieved only through difficult choices, sustained with intelligent effort, and will depend very much on the technical details. This is the view expressed&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/minimum_deterrence_7552&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jeffrey_lewis/recent_work">Jeffrey Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1394">Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/961">Nuclear Strategy &amp;amp; Nonproliferation Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wmd">WMD</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7552 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffrey Lewis in Newstrack | &#039;New Law Bans Iranians from Studying Nuclear Technology in the Netherlands&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/jeffrey_lewis_newstrack_new_law_bans_iranians_studying_nuclear_technology_netherlands</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
...&amp;quot;But the Dutch law is surprisingly harsh,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Jeffrey Lewis&lt;/strong&gt;, an
arms-control expert at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, a think-tank based
in Washington DC.  &amp;quot;I don&#039;t know of any other state that has
viewed its obligations in such a broad fashion. The legislation seems
like an awfully crude instrument to me,&amp;quot; he added... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/5508&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jeffrey_lewis/recent_work">Jeffrey Lewis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1391">Newstrack (India)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/961">Nuclear Strategy &amp;amp; Nonproliferation Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7541 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna on the Kojo Nnamdi Show | &#039;U.S. - Indian Relations&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_kojo_nnamdi_show_u_s_indian_relations</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A landmark nuclear cooperation deal between India and the United States
is on the rocks, threatened by deep divisions within India&#039;s governing
coalition. As leaders from both countries meet at the annual Group of
Eight summit, we explore their evolving relationship and the role of
the Indian-American diaspora in foreign affairs.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://wamu.org/programs/kn/08/07/07.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to Audio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Guests: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;guest&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Sanjay Puri, Chairman, U.S. Indian Political Action Committee (USINPAC)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;guest&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt;, Director,
&lt;strong&gt;Global Governance Initiative&lt;/strong&gt; in &lt;strong&gt;American Strategy Program&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;New America
Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;; author, &lt;em&gt;The Second World: Empires and Influence in the New
Global Order&lt;/em&gt; (Random House)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1143">WAMU 88.5 FM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7698 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett in The Australian | &#039;Nirvana Out of American Reach&#039; </title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_australian_nirvana_out_american_reach</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The energy, financial and political woes that grip the US signal a decisive shift in world power, mocking the liberal delusion that Barack Obama or John McCain can return American prestige and power to its pre-Bush year 2000 nirvana. There is no such nirvana. There is instead a new reality: the greatest transfer of income in human history, away from energy importers such as the US to energy exporters; the rise of a new breed of wealthy autocracies that cripple US hopes of dominating the global system; and demands on the US to make fresh compromises in a world where power is rapidly being diversified....
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Flynt Leverett,&lt;/strong&gt; former director of Middle East Affairs on the National
Security Council, says: &amp;quot;The international economic position of the
United States has deteriorated substantially since the new millennium.
The big trends in global finance and energy markets are working against
the US. There isn&#039;t any solving this problem in terms of making it go
away. These are ongoing realities. The energy picture is not going to
change: it is here to stay...&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23968711-7583,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/206">The Australian</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7497 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Survey Says: Stop Backing Musharraf</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/survey_says_stop_backing_musharraf_7504</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The US government is pressing the new Pakistani civilian administration to back off efforts to remove Pervez Musharraf from the presidency.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But if the United States truly wanted to shore up democracy and help fight terrorism inside Pakistan, it would pursue the exactly opposite policy: the United States should publicly back the immediate removal of Mr Musharraf. A new public opinion survey shows why.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
More than the ailing economy, the survey, conducted by Terror Free Tomorrow in collaboration with the New America Foundation and the Pakistan Institute for Public Opinion, revealed that the most important priority for Pakistanis is an&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/survey_says_stop_backing_musharraf_7504&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_bergen/recent_work">Peter Bergen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1335">The National (UAE)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1268">Counter-Terrorism and Counter-Insurgency Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/pakistan">Pakistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7504 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flynt Leverett in the National Interest | &#039;Does the G8 Still Matter?&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/flynt_leverett_national_interest_does_g8_still_matter</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...From July 7–9, as the Nixon Center’s executive director and
moderator of the discussion Paul Saunders said, the world’s heaviest
hitters will meet to discuss the most-pressing problems. Former
ambassador to Germany and current managing director at McLarty
Associates, Richard Burt, and &lt;strong&gt;Flynt Leverett&lt;/strong&gt; of the &lt;strong&gt;New America
Foundation&lt;/strong&gt; met at the Nixon Center on Wednesday to look at an
even-more-basic issue: whether the G8 still matters. Or, as Ambassador
Burt asked, if it ever did.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The G8’s purview is simply too broad
to be effective, Burt argued. The group should return to its roots,
economics, if it hopes to retain relevancy in today’s world of global
markets and interconnected states. Leverrett agreed, but put the future
of the group in even-starker terms: developing a strategy of global
economic governance is “imperative” for the G8’s survival, and U.S.
interests in a rapidly changing world. Failing to adapt, he said, is
simply an “abrogation of responsibility...” &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=19336&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to article&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-span.org/VideoArchives.asp?CatCodePairs=Issue,I;&amp;amp;ArchiveDays=100&amp;amp;Page=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to C-SPAN video&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/894">The National Interest Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:17:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7496 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fynt Leverett on C-SPAN | the Nixon Center Panel Discussion on Relevance of G8 Summit</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/fyntt_leverett_c_span_nixon_center_panel_discussion_relevance_g8_summit</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;text&quot;&gt;As the host of the 2008 G8 Summit, Japan has
established an agenda focused on non-proliferation, the international
economy, climate change, and development. With changes in the global
distribution of wealth and influence over the last thirty years, the
Nixon Center hosts a panel discussion on the relevance of the G8 Summit. &lt;strong&gt;Flynt Leverett&lt;/strong&gt;, Senior Fellow and the Director of the &lt;strong&gt;Geopolitics of Energy Initiative&lt;/strong&gt; at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;,  serves as a co-panelist. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-span.org/VideoArchives.asp?CatCodePairs=Issue,I;&amp;amp;ArchiveDays=100&amp;amp;Page=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK to video&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/893">C-SPAN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/668">Geopolitics of Energy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7495 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Does Osama bin Laden Still Matter?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/does_osama_bin_laden_still_matter_7490</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Does Osama bin Laden matter anymore? You could be forgiven for thinking he doesn&#039;t. In recent months, an impressive cast of terrorism experts and counterterrorism officials around the world has coalesced around the notion that al-Qaeda&#039;s leader is no longer an active threat to the West. They point out that he has not been able to strike on U.S. soil since 9/11 or in Europe since the London bombings three summers ago. In Iraq, his most successful franchise operation is on the ropes. Across the Muslim world, opinion polls suggest his popularity has faded, and many of his early supporters&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/does_osama_bin_laden_still_matter_7490&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/peter_bergen/recent_work">Peter Bergen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/156">TIME Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1268">Counter-Terrorism and Counter-Insurgency Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7490 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna in Khaleej Times | &#039;UAE a Rare Success Story&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_khaleej_times</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
American author and international relations analyst &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt; yesterday called the UAE a &amp;quot;rare success story&amp;quot;, attributing it to its geographical location, globalisation and blend of foreign legacies with indigenous power structures. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Speaking on the role of the emirates in the geopolitical market place, Khanna, Fellow and Director of &lt;strong&gt;Global Governance Initiative&lt;/strong&gt; at the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, a non-partisan, public policy institute in Washington DC, termed the UAE &amp;quot;a meeting point for first world European technology and third world labour&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The UAE has a culture of Eurasia. It is a story of foreign legacies blended with indigenous power structures in a post-colonial world. It is also a success story of globalisation, which is rare in post-colonial countries,&amp;quot; said Khanna, who was a geopolitical advisor to the United States Special Operations Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2007... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?col=&amp;amp;section=theuae&amp;amp;xfile=data/theuae/2008/June/theuae_June1051.xml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1185">Khaleej Times (Dubai)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7455 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna in XPress | &#039;UAE more influential&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_xpress_uae_more_influential</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flooded with oil money and foreign investments, the UAE is influencing
international developments like never before, said a visiting US
scholar on Sunday. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From putting boots on the ground in war-torn Afghanistan – for
reconstruction efforts – to bailing out giant companies from the recent
property crash in America, the Emirates is now a ‘player’ in world
affairs, &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt;, the director of the &lt;strong&gt;Global Governance
Initiative&lt;/strong&gt;, told reporters at the Dubai Press Club... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xpress4me.com/news/uae/dubai/20008335.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1379">XPress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7456 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New Colonialists</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/new_colonialists_7379</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Even on their best days, the world’s failed states are difficult to mistake for anything but tragic examples of countries gone wrong. A few routinely make the headlines -- Somalia, Iraq, Congo. But alongside their brand of extreme state dysfunction exists an entirely separate, easily missed class of states teetering on the edge. In dozens of countries, corrupt or feeble governments are proving themselves dangerously incapable of carrying out the most basic responsibilities of statehood. These countries -- nations such as Botswana, Cambodia, Georgia, and Kenya -- might appear to be recovering, even thriving, developing countries, but like their failed-state&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/new_colonialists_7379&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maria_figueroa_kupcu/recent_work">Maria Figueroa Küpçü</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_a_cohen/recent_work">Michael A. Cohen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/104">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/887">Global Governance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1267">Privatization of Foreign Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/global_governance">Global Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7379 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parag Khanna in Turkish Daily News | &#039;Redifining Turkey&#039;s Strategic Orientation&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_turkish_daily_news_redifining_turkeys_strategic_orientation</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
...The implications from denying Turkey an avenue to the European Union
are not limited to damaging Turkey, however, but also diminish Europe
itself. As &lt;strong&gt;Parag Khanna&lt;/strong&gt; affirmed, “Europe increasingly needs Turkey,”
which he defines as representing a “geopolitical asset (that) Europe
cannot do without...” &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=107998&quot;&gt;LINK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/parag_khanna_turkish_daily_news_redifining_turkeys_strategic_orientation#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/parag_khanna/recent_work">Parag Khanna</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1360">Turkish Daily News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1264">Transnational Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7370 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
