Is Afghanistan Obama's Vietnam? Hardly.

Published:   July 16, 2009

If the Iraq War was the defining conflict of the George W. Bush administration, the war in Afghanistan appears destined to be Barack Obama's. During last year's campaign, Obama made it clear that he considered the Afghan-Pakistani border the central front in the war against terrorism. As president, he has taken ownership of the Afghan conflict by appointing new leadership to oversee the war and embarking on a new strategy, including the deployment of some 70,000 American soldiers by year's end and a push for billions of dollars in additional aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Will this strategy be enough? Many people don't think so; some congressional Democrats are running out of patience, the media have openly wondered whether Afghanistan is--in the words of Newsweek--"Obama's Vietnam," and 42 percent of Americans now believe the Afghan war was a mistake.

In the July/August issue of the Washington Monthly, New America Foundation's Peter Bergen begs to differ. In "Winning the Good War," Bergen--an NAF senior fellow and frequent visitor to Afghanistan--argues that success in Afghanistan is closer than it initially appears, and there is good reason to believe that Obama's strategy will work. Comparisons to past wars such as Vietnam or the Soviets' Afghan debacle, Bergen argues, are facile, and ignore trends that suggest that both military victory and a measure of lasting stability for the war-torn country are within reach, as long as the United States pursues the right course of action there.

To read Bergen's story: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2009/0907.bergen.html

For press inquiries, please contact Kate Brown at 202-596-3365 or brown@newamerica.net.

About the New America Foundation
The New America Foundation is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy institute that invests in new thinkers and new ideas to address the next generation of challenges facing the United States.

Issues: