<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Lindsey Luebchow: All Publications, Events and Press</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/content/760/all</link>
 <description>All content by a given person, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Academic March Madness</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/academic_march_madness_6985</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If you&#039;ve watched any of the televised men&#039;s college basketball tournament this year, you&#039;ve been bombarded by NCAA commercials that declare: &amp;quot;There are 380,000 NCAA student athletes... and just about every one of them will go pro in something other than sports.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It&#039;s an uplifting tagline, but there&#039;s a catch. In order to &amp;quot;go pro in something other than sports,&amp;quot; that athlete needs a college degree. And far too many male athletes in top-tier Division I basketball programs never graduate.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The teams that played in the Sweet 16 this year have some of the worst academic records in the country, particularly the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/academic_march_madness_6985&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6985 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lindsey Luebchow in Cleveland Plain Dealer | DC Group Ranks NCAA Teams by Players&#039; Graduation Rates</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/lindsey_luebchow_plain_dealer_washington_group_ranks_ncaa_teams_players_graduation_rates</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cleveland.com/sports/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/sports/1206779475229150.xml&amp;amp;coll=2&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Cleveland Plain Dealer | Washington Group Ranks NCAA Teams by Players&#039; Graduation Rates&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Forget wins and losses. Disregard the strength of schedule. Pay no attention to margins of victory.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Call it March madness, but what if the teams in this year&#039;s NCAA men&#039;s basketball tournament were ranked by diplomas rather than dunks?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That&#039;s a rite the Washington, D.C.-based &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt; celebrates each spring. Earlier this week, the nonprofit public policy institute released its own tournament bracket that has to do more with mastering Joyce than making jump shots. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The foundation, an advocate for greater equity in school funding and college financial aid, uses the big-time tournament to underscore a big-time problem: A majority of players leave college with neither a professional career nor a four-year degree. In all, 55 percent of Division I players do not graduate. About 1 percent of them make it to the NBA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Amid the flashy, commercialized spectacle that is March Madness, few think about the players who aren&#039;t going to be able to go pro in anything, basketball or otherwise,&amp;quot; said policy analyst &lt;strong&gt;Lindsey Luebchow&lt;/strong&gt;, who created the bracket. . .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To view the New America Foundation&#039;s Academic Sweet 16 bracket, go to &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/blog/higher-ed-watch/2008/academic-madness-march-2982&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Higher Ed Watch.Org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/943">Cleveland Plain Dealer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7035 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lindsey Luebchow on WTOP Radio in DC | Top B-Ball Shools Have Poor Grad Rates</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/lindsey_luebchow_wtop_radio_dc_top_b_ball_shools_have_poor_grad_rates</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wtopnews.com/emedia/112838.mp3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;WTOP Radio in DC | Top B-Ball Shools Have Poor Grad Rates&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;
New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt; Education Policy Analyst &lt;strong&gt;Lindsey Luebchow&lt;/strong&gt; discussed the Annual Academic Sweet Sixteen bracket results with WTOP Radio in DC. Also, Luebchow&#039;s comments on the NCAA teams&#039; academic ranking appeared on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsradio.com/index.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CBS Radio&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; nationally broadcast morning show (3/27/08). Following these hits, the &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/academic_march_madness_6985&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; published Luebchow&#039;s op-ed &amp;quot;Academic March Madness.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Lindsey Luebchow writes for New America&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/ed_money_watch&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ed Money Watch&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/higher_ed_watch&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Higher Ed Watch&lt;/a&gt; blogs. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1025">WTOP Radio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7034 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New America Foundation in Chronicle of Higher Education | &#039;President Bush: A Friend of Higher Education After All?&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2008/new_america_foundation_chronicle_higher_education_president_bush_friend_higher_education_after_all</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i23/23a00101.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;President Bush: A Friend of Higher Education After All? (&lt;em&gt;The Chronicle of Higher Education&lt;/em&gt;, subcription only)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... Mr. Bush has, however, given researchers, and their colleagues throughout higher education, something else of value: money. The president has been &amp;quot;highly successful&amp;quot; in winning increases for higher education from Congress, according to an &lt;a href=&quot;/files/FEBP_Bush_Education_Budget_Legacy.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; published last month by the &lt;strong&gt;New America Foundation&lt;/strong&gt;, a Washington-based research and advocacy group that is often critical of the Bush administration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Congress adopted nearly all of the significant higher-education funding and policy proposals included in the president&#039;s budget requests from 2002 through 2008,&amp;quot; including increases in Pell Grants and loan-forgiveness programs, the foundation noted. &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i23/23a00101.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/heather_rieman/recent_work">Heather Rieman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jason_delisle/recent_work">Jason Delisle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_dannenberg/recent_work">Michael Dannenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/820">The Chronicle of Higher Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6767 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Bush Education Budget Legacy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/bush_education_budget_legacy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Next week, President George W. Bush will submit his eighth and final budget request to the Congress. How has he fared with respect to education budget proposals thus far? Answer: although President Bush made the No Child Left Behind Act, which deals with elementary and secondary education, the hallmark of his education policy, from a federal education budget standpoint, the Bush administration’s most lasting legacy thus far is in higher education. The New America Foundation’s Federal Education Budget Project evaluated all the Bush administration&#039;s past budget requests and finds that the Bush administration has had relatively little success in enacting its&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/bush_education_budget_legacy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/heather_rieman/recent_work">Heather Rieman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jason_delisle/recent_work">Jason Delisle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/FEBP_Bush_Education_Budget_Legacy.pdf" length="172785" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6632 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Minority Recruitment: Athletics Success, Admissions Failure</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2008/01/athletic_minority_recruitment</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Diversity and minority recruitment are hot button words in most four year college admissions offices. There are congratulations when enrollment demographics show greater racial diversity, and there is consternation when minority numbers drop. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But are college admissions office recruitment efforts working? Colleges will, in a knee-jerk fashion, say: yes, look at our racial and ethnic percentages! College access for minorities is a reality here! But how much is minority recruitment in admissions offices really contributing to the diversity of college campuses? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Unfortunately, at some Division I schools, not much. The black-white diversity on many campuses is not&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2008/01/athletic_minority_recruitment&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2008/01/athletic_minority_recruitment#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6589 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>College Football PR 101: Academic Bonuses</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2008/01/academic_bonuses</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When Louisiana State University coach Les Miles was carried off the field after winning the National Championship game last night, his smile likely reflected more than the pure joy of winning. Miles had already garnered $400,000 in football bonuses for making it to the game. After winning the title, his contract states that his total salary will be adjusted to at least the third-highest salary in all of Division I football— which will boost it by about $1.15 million more than he’s currently making. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That’s quite an incentive to win on&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2008/01/academic_bonuses&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2008/01/academic_bonuses#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:48:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6529 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When Redshirting Goes Wrong: Boston College Fans Take Note</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/12/redshirting</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The professionalization of college athletics is a thorny issue, one that we addressed in a recent blog post on Boston College’s current football team. We pointed out that many of the elite players on BC’s football team this year, such as star quarterback Matt Ryan, are no longer really students because they have already graduated and are spending minimal time in the classroom. Without the &amp;quot;student&amp;quot; part of student-athlete, we argued, these football players become exclusively money-making and media-attracting devices for their school and skirt the line between college and professional sports. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The reaction from BC&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/12/redshirting&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/12/redshirting#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6471 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Matter of Degrees</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/matter_degrees_6449</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the college football season nears its final showdown between Ohio State and LSU, the media-stoked frenzy over which teams were selected for the Bowl Championship Series has reached a fever pitch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Penn State is in the Alamo Bowl, with less money and media attention. But if team academic performance were considered by the BCS, Penn State would have fared much better. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Over all, the academic performance of big-time college football is dismal. Only 56 percent of Division I-A football players graduate within six years of enrollment. Many who do receive a diploma are tracked into jock majors or&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/matter_degrees_6449&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1168">Philadelphia Daily News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:53:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6449 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lindsey Luebchow in The Modesto Bee on Academic BCS</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/lindsey_luebchow_modesto_bee_academic_bowl_championship_series</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
...Since coming into existence in 1906, the NCAA has struggled with its basic charter -- identifying and maintaining the correct balance between athletics and academics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In recent years, the NCAA has established the Academic Progress Rate (APR), which creates a baseline measurement of retention and graduation rates its member schools must meet or risk the forfeiture of scholarships.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One might question the logic of taking away scholarships from underachieving athletic programs, but that&amp;#39;s another matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And obviously, we&amp;#39;ll never see a scenario in which an academic test becomes a part of an athletic event -- such as the hypothetical case above -- but at least one Washington think tank would like to see classroom performance have a bearing on which schools are in line to receive multi-million dollar Bowl Championship Series payoffs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;In general, athletes graduate at a higher rate than the general student population,&amp;quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Lindsey Luebchow&lt;/strong&gt;, a policy analyst at the non-profit New America Foundation. &amp;quot;In general, student-athletes are doing a good job, but football and basketball are different stories.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Luebchow also is [a contributor] of Higher Ed Watch, a respected blog. Recently, she was asked by ESPN.com to develop a way to measure the academic performance of BCS teams and came up with a system that goes well beyond the NCAA&amp;#39;s APR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She chose to add or subtract points based on the team&amp;#39;s graduation rate when compared to that of the school, and rewarded or penalized a team for a high disparity between graduation rates of black and white athletes, again measured against the school&amp;#39;s general population.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes, the race issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;A lot of students are being recruited for athletics that are not prepared for college, having come from places that do not put a priority on education,&amp;quot; Luebchow said. &amp;quot;But once these students are admitted, the schools have the responsibility to make sure these students have access to the tools necessary to leave with a degree.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Luebchow applied her math and on Tuesday released her re-ranking of the 25 teams listed in the most recent BCS standings, throwing out on-field performance. Her academic national championship game?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let us all yawn in unison. It&amp;#39;s No. 1 Boston College against No. 2 Cincinnati. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the complete article, please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modbee.com/columnists/vanderbeek/story/135829.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;follow this link&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1154">The Modesto Bee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6378 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WTOP Radio Interviews Lindsey Luebchow on ABCS</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/wtop_radio_interviews_lindsey_luebchow_academic_bowl_championship_series</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After New America&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.higheredwatch.org&quot;&gt;Higher Ed Watch.Org&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/pressroom/2007/espn_releases_academic_bowl_championship_series_features_lindsey_luebchow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ESPN&lt;/a&gt; released the Academic Bowl Championship Series (ABCS), the Education Program’s Lindsey Luebchow was interviewed by WTOP radio. Please check out the attachment for the mp3 recording of the interview.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1025">WTOP Radio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/557">Audio</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/luebchow_wtop.mp3" length="3706880" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6456 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Evaluating Jock Majors and College Quality</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/football_college_quality</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yesterday, Higher Ed Watch unveiled its first &amp;quot;Academic Bowl Championship Series&amp;quot; poll, which ranked the current top teams in college football using academic instead of athletic indicators. In developing the Academic BCS poll, we took advantage of all of the data that is publicly available on college athletes’ academic performance: graduation rates and the NCAA’s &amp;quot;Academic Progress Rates.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That’s right, there are only two academic data points available for college athletes (with graduation rates disaggregated by race). To see all of the data we used for our Academic BCS formula,  &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/football_college_quality&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/football_college_quality#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Higher_Ed_Watch_Academic_BCS_Data.xls" length="29184" type="application/octet-stream" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6370 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ESPN Features Academic Bowl Championship Series, Lindsey Luebchow</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/espn_releases_academic_bowl_championship_series_features_lindsey_luebchow</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a few days, hooded figures manipulating mysterious computer formulas will announce the final BCS standings and the lineup for college football&amp;#39;s prestigious bowl games. Records, opponents, conference affiliations, polls and, it always seems, the phases of the moons of Saturn will be taken into account. But what if academics were factored in, too? What if there were an A/BCS -- an Academics-Included Bowl Championship Series?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I put that question to Lindsey Luebchow, a policy analyst of the New America Foundation and a contributor to &lt;a href=&quot;/programs/education_policy/higher_ed_watch/blog&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Higher Ed Watch&lt;/a&gt;, one of the country&amp;#39;s best blogs. Luebchow relentlessly dissects hypocrisy, double-talk and yammer in higher education, especially the big colleges&amp;#39; relationships to Congress. She is also a sports nut, and annually computes what the men&amp;#39;s basketball Sweet 16 would look like based on educational achievement. So I asked her to do the same for the top 25 BCS teams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Appropriately, Luebchow came up with a ratings procedure that&amp;#39;s hard to understand -- just like the real BCS! Her reasoning: &amp;quot;The A/BCS formula starts with the football team&amp;#39;s four-class average federal graduation rate, which includes all football players who entered college between 1997 and 2000 and graduated within six years. Football programs then earn or lose points based on three criteria. First, the gap between the graduation rate of the team and the overall school. Second, the gap between the black-white graduation rate disparity on the team and at the overall school. Third, the team&amp;#39;s Academic Progress Rate, a measure developed by the NCAA that evaluates how many student-athletes are advancing toward a degree.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Without further ado, here are the big-bowl pairings if academics mattered, with the A/BCS ranking following the school name ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For those rankings please &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/academic_bowl_championship_series&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;, and visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/071127&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the ESPN website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1169">ESPN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6454 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Academic Bowl Championship Series</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/academic_bowl_championship_series</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the end of every college football season, there’s an uproar about the &amp;quot;Bowl Championship Series&amp;quot; (BCS) formula that decides which teams get to play for the National Championship and in various bowl games. This year is no different—sports commentators are in a tizzy about which teams will get picked by the formula in the final BCS ranking next Sunday. Get ready for the final weeks of moaning and groaning about why certain components of the BCS formula are unfair and biased.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Put to the task by ESPN&amp;#39;s Tuesday&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/academic_bowl_championship_series&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/academic_bowl_championship_series#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Higher Ed Watch Academic BCS Formula.pdf" length="23953" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6340 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>At Boston College, Blurring the Student-Athlete-Professional Line</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/boston_college_professionalization</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last week, we highlighted a couple of big-time college football teams struggling on the field but excelling in the classroom. We suggested it might be difficult, if not impossible, for teams to maintain stellar athletic and academic records given the time constraints and pressures on student-athletes. Are there examples of big-time football schools that are having both athletic and academic success this season?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The most obvious answer is Boston College. After its first loss this past weekend, BC’s football team is still ranked #1 in the ACC and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/boston_college_professionalization&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/11/boston_college_professionalization#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6237 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Nebraska, A’s in the Classroom Might Get You Fired</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/nebraska_athletic_director_fired</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two weeks ago, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln fired its athletic director, Steve Pederson, after the football team started the season 4-3 overall and 1-2 in the Big 12 conference. Following three more losses, Nebraska’s perennially dominant football team has now been outscored 150 to 59 by Big 12 opponents in its past four games. Chancellor Harvey Perlman had seen enough, and pulled the plug on Pederson only three months after extending his contract for five years. Nebraska’s football coach Bill Callahan is likely next to go.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/nebraska_athletic_director_fired&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/nebraska_athletic_director_fired#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6198 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Accountability for All...Except the Department of Education</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/department_education_accountability</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Department of Education loves to talk the talk about accountability. But when it comes to walking the walk, it’s failing—and pretty spectacularly. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Case #1  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Front and center is the Department’s handling of a student loan subsidy payment scandal. In an interview with the Washington Post published this weekend, Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings admitted that the Department of Education is accountable for overpaying student lenders hundreds of millions of dollars in improper 9.5 percent loan subsidy payments. Spellings has said she&amp;#39;s not going to try to collect the overpayments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/department_education_accountability&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/department_education_accountability#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6169 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are Tax Deductions for College Athletics Worth the Price?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/tax_deduction_athletics_donations</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last year, oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens broke the all-time record for gift-giving to a university athletics program when he donated $165 million to Oklahoma State University, his alma mater. Not only did OSU&#039;s sports program benefit, but Pickens himself received a large subsidy from the government because he was able to deduct that contribution from his income taxes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Donations to college athletics programs are tax-exempt because government officials have long believed that college sports contribute to the educational purpose of higher education. When alumni give money to sports, the theory goes, they are&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/tax_deduction_athletics_donations&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/10/tax_deduction_athletics_donations#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6068 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Searching for Effective Football Penalties in the NCAA</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/09/ncaa_penalties</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, we highlighted the poor performance of college football players in the classroom and discussed the NCAA’s academic reform efforts. After this season, the NCAA will have finished collecting all of its academic progress rate (APR) data on Division I colleges and is slated to implement a full range of penalties for underperforming teams. Approximately 40 percent of college football teams are in danger of losing scholarships next year. What remains to be seen is whether the penalties will have any impact on academic programs for college athletes. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/09/ncaa_penalties&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/09/ncaa_penalties#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5984 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Academic Progress for Football Players: Is the NCAA For Real?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/09/ncaa_football_academic_progress</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As the college football season kicks into high gear, it’s hard not to get caught up in or at least be exposed to the insane promotion of big-time college athletics. Many of us watch and read around-the-clock media commentary that glorifies college football players for their on-field accomplishments and generates a religious-like fervor for each week’s game. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As coaches and ESPN commentators go on and on about how much time is put in to preparing for every detail of every match-up, you might ask yourself:&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/education_policy/2007/09/ncaa_football_academic_progress&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blogs/education_policy/2007/09/ncaa_football_academic_progress#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/705">Higher Ed Watch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/athletics">Athletics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/803">Original Content</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5970 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
