<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Noah Feldman: All Publications, Events and Press</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/content/416/all</link>
 <description>All content by a given person, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Totally Religious, Absolutely Democratic Constitution</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_totally_religious_absolutely_democratic_constitution</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A decade ago, almost everyone across the political spectrum--from neoconservatives to Islamic fundamentalists--agreed that democracy and Islam were inherently incompatible. This consensus followed from definitions: democracy means the rule of the people, whereas Islam teaches the sovereignty of God. In October, though, Iraqis went to the polls and ratified a Constitution that committed itself with equal strength to both democracy and Islam. The document announced that Iraq would be a democracy with equality for all and declared that no law could contradict the principles of democracy. At the same time, it declared Islam the basic source of law and the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_totally_religious_absolutely_democratic_constitution&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/41">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2252 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>War-Mood Metrics</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/war_mood_metrics</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A little less than a year ago, in the aftermath of the first Iraqi elections, the most irresponsible thing being said in Washington was that everything was going to be fine. Now, with the next set of elections scheduled for December 15, the new irresponsibility is the increasingly respectable assertion that the war has already been lost. Irrational optimism has been replaced by unjustified pessimism. This is not some triumph of experience over idealism. One a priori ideological standpoint is simply giving way to another. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The last, bloody year in Iraq has seen an uninterrupted stream of insurgent attacks on&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/war_mood_metrics&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/41">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2253 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>God, Government and You;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/god_government_and_you</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael Newdow, a California atheist, has gained plenty of notoriety over the past few years. He got a case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court contending that children in general--his daughter in particular--must not recite the words &quot;under God&quot; in the Pledge of Allegiance in school. Why not? Because he believes the words, which were added in 1954, violate the separation of church and state. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You may have thought Newdow had gone away. After all, the high court threw out the case because he doesn&#039;t have custody of his daughter. But he&#039;s back, making the challenge again on&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/god_government_and_you&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/113">USA Today</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2132 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Meaning of No</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_meaning_of_no</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Casting a yes vote in next Saturday&#039;s constitutional referendum in Iraq would be easy to understand. Although the proposed document is too decentralizing for some tastes and too Islamic for others, those who choose to ratify it are clearly embracing democratic politics instead of violence. But what would it mean to vote no, as hundreds of thousands of Iraqis seem poised to do? &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If enough no votes are cast in the right places, they will sink the constitution. Should two-thirds of the voters in 3 separate provinces (out of 18 in Iraq) check the no box, Iraqis would be sent&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_meaning_of_no&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/41">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2072 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Agreeing to Disagree in Iraq</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/agreeing_to_disagree_in_iraq</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The completion of Iraq&#039;s draft constitution, which will be submitted to the people for ratification in October, should have been an occasion for celebration. As most Americans are aware, it has not been. But while much of the criticism has focused on such areas as women&#039;s rights, federalism and the role of Islam, such concerns are largely misplaced. In fact, the text strives to balance democratic equality with the Islamic values that are popular with many Iraqi voters, and it sketches a workable if vague compromise on power-sharing between the center and the federal regions.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The major problem is&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/agreeing_to_disagree_in_iraq&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2029 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Power of The Book;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_power_of_the_book</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Religion and politics used to be the two great taboos of polite conversation. Today politics is everywhere, right down to the Fox and CNN ubiquitous at the gym. But religion remains a special case. The mainstream news media--television in particular, which is where many Americans get the bulk of their information--treads lightly when it touches it at all, afraid of giving offense or oversimplifying and reaping the consequences. Talking heads pontificating about Islam as a source of terror is not a discussion of religion. Evangelicals almost never appear on mainstream TV, not even Fox. I can&#039;t think of the last&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_power_of_the_book&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/187">Publishers Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2365 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foundering?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/foundering</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a constitution succeeds, its framers come to be regarded as visionaries. They are seen in retrospect to have predicted future difficulties and dealt with them ingeniously, by building a machine that would run of itself. From the inside, though, constitution drafting is not so philosophical and frictionless; it does not take place under the aspect of the eternal. The immediate politics of the moment dominate, along with the lurking fear that if the constitution is not ratified, national collapse may follow. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In Baghdad today, as in Philadelphia in 1787, constitution writing means horse-trading, improvisation, dispute and deferral. As Iraq&#039;s&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/foundering&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/41">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1832 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Church-State Solution</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/a_church_state_solution</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
I. THE EXPERIMENT    &lt;p&gt;For roughly 1,400 years, from the time the Roman Empire became Christian to the American Revolution, the question of church and state in the West always began with a simple assumption: the official religion of the state was the religion of its ruler. Sometimes the king fought the church for control of religious institutions; other times, the church claimed power over the state by asserting religious authority over the sovereign himself. But the central idea, formally enshrined at Westphalia in 1648 by the treaty that ended the wars of religion in Europe, was that&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/a_church_state_solution&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/41">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1101 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Divided by God</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/books/divided_by_god</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Selected reviews of Divided by God are featured below:&lt;/p&gt; 		   Kirkus Reviews &lt;p&gt; Friday, July 15, 2005 		&amp;quot;Can&amp;#39;t we all—fundamentalist and atheist and nonideologist—just get along? It wouldn&amp;#39;t seem so, writes NYU law professor Feldman (After Jihad), who argues that the ever-hotter war between the proponents of &amp;#39;values evangelism&amp;#39; on one hand and &amp;#39;legal secularism&amp;#39; on the other &amp;#39;now threatens to destroy a common national vision.&amp;#39; That vision includes belief in the constitutional separation of church and state; and, as Feldman observes, the battle is not strictly about religious belief as such, but about how religious belief&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/books/divided_by_god&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/219">Farrar, Straus and Giroux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1030 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ugly Americans</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/ugly_americans</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A review of Karen J. Greenberg and Joshua L. Dratel&#039;s The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib and Mark Danner&#039;s Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Canaanite king Adoni-bezek has just a single line of dialogue in the Bible, but it is one not easily forgotten. Defeated by the combined forces of the tribes of Judah and Simeon, he is subjected to the ordeal of having his index fingers and great toes cut off. Adoni-bezek&#039;s philosophical response is that in his day he himself lopped off the fingers and toes of seventy kings: &quot;As&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/ugly_americans&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2644 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Global Warning</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/global_warning</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The globalization of Islam is nothing new. The Prophet Muhammad himself confronted Jews, Christians and pagans in his Arabian milieu -- and within a couple of generations, Islam, spread by conquest and conversion alike, came into fruitful contact with the legacies of Persian, Greek and Roman civilizations.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, since 9/11, the pace of the engagement between global Islam and other, mostly Western, forces and ideas has quickened, and the stakes have grown. The latest round of books on Islam and the West attempts to make sense of this most recent and intense episode of global interaction and conflict. Mostly,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/global_warning&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2311 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Now for the Hard Part in Iraq</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/now_for_the_hard_part_in_iraq</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Iraqis who braved violence to vote on Sunday in the country&#039;s first free election in 50 years were, like voters everywhere, expressing democratic belief in ownership over their political future. Many also believed, in accordance with the teaching of Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the moderate Iraqi Shia leader, that voting was a religious obligation. If, as seems likely, the Shia parties associated with Mr Sistani have taken a substantial majority, elected officials who describe themselves as Islamic democrats will, for the first time, actually get the opportunity to govern after taking office. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In Iraq, the convergence of Islam and democratic&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/now_for_the_hard_part_in_iraq&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/73">The Financial Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1181 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What We Owe Iraq</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2004/what_we_owe_iraq</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
11/16/2004 - 12:00pm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In his just released book &lt;i&gt;What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation Building&lt;/i&gt;, Noah Feldman presents a penetrating analysis of the present and future complexities involved in rebuilding Iraq.  He fosters an urgent discussion on why America&#039;s ethical obligations to the Iraqi people should be at the forefront of the nation building process.  Drawing on both historic and modern day examples, Feldman reveals why Iraq poses more ethical dilemmas than any prior nation undertaking.  He offers a coherent case on how and why the U.S. should live up to its moral commitment to the Iraqi people in order to produce a democratic and free nation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Associate Professor of Law at New York University and author of the best-selling book After Jihad, Noah Feldman has seen the enormous challenges facing Iraq firsthand.  He served as an advisor in 2003 to the Coalition authorities and, later to the Iraqi Governing Council charged with creating Iraq&#039;s interim constitution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please join us for a discussion focusing on the war and ethics of nation building including the need to balance America&#039;s self-interests with those of the Iraqi people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_clemons/recent_work">Steven Clemons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/544">Best of 2004</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">340 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Sunni Angle</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/the_sunni_angle</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. military, with help from Kurdish-dominated Iraqi national guard units, has done its part in taking Fallujah. But the war against the insurgency will not be won by military means alone. The ultimate objective is political: drawing Iraq&#039;s Sunni Arabs into elections and the constitutional process that will follow. The only route to a peaceful Iraq runs through negotiations -- and those must include all the country&#039;s major groups, not only those who have already agreed to attempt federal democracy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basic order is the necessary prerequisite for both elections and a national debate about the shape of Iraq&#039;s future government.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/the_sunni_angle&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/78">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/544">Best of 2004</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1248 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What We Owe Iraq</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/books/what_we_owe_iraq</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Selected reviews of What We Owe Iraq are featured below:&lt;/p&gt;  The Washington Post 		 		 		 	    	             		 		 		 		 		 &lt;p&gt; Sunday, November 21, 2004 Many Americans don&amp;#39;t understand what they&amp;#39;re currently up against. Al Qaeda has often been depicted as the superpower of terrorist and jihadist networks, commanding the allegiance of jihadist groups throughout the world and influencing global terrorist operations through a steady flow of money and recruits. In fact, al Qaeda has become a relatively small operational&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/books/what_we_owe_iraq&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/305">Princeton University Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1062 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Iraq Can Wait for Democracy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/iraq_can_wait_for_democracy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the Iraqi Shiite leader, is concerned that Shiites may not be adequately represented in a future government, fueling worries that the national election scheduled for January may not happen. And even if the election does proceed as planned, many Sunni clerics in the turbulent central region of the country are urging their followers to boycott it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, this situation may not be the hopeless muddle it appears. First, a close look at the messages from the Sistani camp reveals that his intervention seems less an attempt to derail the election than a calculated effort to improve&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/iraq_can_wait_for_democracy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1791 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democracy in the Islamic World</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/democracy_in_the_islamic_world</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IN A REMARKABLE SPEECH at the National Endowment for Democracy in November 2003, President Bush acknowledged 60 years of American error and announced a policy of encouraging democracy, not dictatorship, in the Muslim world.  Whether this long overdue message is followed by an actual policy change or simply results from the short-term need to explain the Iraq war in the absence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) remains to be seen. But in any event, Bush neglected to mention a crucial fact that looms over every discussion of democratization in the Muslim world: if freed to make their own&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/democracy_in_the_islamic_world&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3566 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Islam and Democracy: The Great Experiment</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/islam_and_democracy_the_great_experiment</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A year ago, the prospects for democracy in the Muslim world depended solely on incremental developments in the politics of individual countries.  Free elections in Turkey, for example, had brought to power an Islamic-oriented party which was, and still is, governing democratically with less military interference than many expected.  Quasi-free elections in Morocco and Pakistan had shown that Islamic parties would win votes when autocratic rulers gave them a chance to take part.  In Iran, meanwhile, it was becoming clear that President Mohammad Khatami lacked either the will or the capacity to stand up to the hardliners&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/islam_and_democracy_the_great_experiment&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/100">The Economist</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iran">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/544">Best of 2004</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1245 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democracy, Closer Every Day</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2003/democracy_closer_every_day</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many Americans, not to mention our European allies, may be shaking their heads over President Bush&amp;#39;s defiant speech at the United Nations yesterday. With the coalition forces under daily attack and billions being spent to rebuild Iraq, shouldn&amp;#39;t Mr. Bush have been more conciliatory in an effort to get other countries to send troops?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actually, Mr. Bush was right to refuse a rushed transfer of sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government as the price to pay for greater international participation in the postwar effort. The reconstruction of Iraq is a two-track process: one track for security, one for politics. The&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2003/democracy_closer_every_day&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/545">Best of 2003</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1299 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Constitutional Democracy &amp; Islam: A Blueprint</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/events/2003/constitutional_democracy_islam_a_blueprint</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;start-time&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
A New America Event&lt;br /&gt;
07/22/2003 - 12:07pm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Noah Feldman,  Former Senior Advisor for Constitutional Law, Office of Reconstruction &amp;amp; Humanitarian Assistance in Iraq; Author, After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy; and Professor of Law, New York University&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;




</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/545">Best of 2003</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/archive/Event_289_5_reg.JPG" length="10" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">353 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
