<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Robert Wright: All Publications, Events and Press</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/people/content/403/all</link>
 <description>All content by a given person, mainly for RSS feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>NYTimes.com Highlights Bloggingheads Video Featuring Mark Schmitt</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2007/new_york_times_highlights_bloggingheads_video_featuring_mark_schmitt</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mark Schmitt&lt;/strong&gt;, of the New America Foundation, and Megan McArdle, of &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic&lt;/em&gt;, discuss whether vouchers are the answer to public education&amp;#39;s problems. Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=ddff052f288a9092f00ee577badbc6abb5d47d6d&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; for a link to the video on NYTimes.com. For Schmitt andMcArdle&amp;#39;s complete conversation, please &lt;a href=&quot;http://bloggingheads.tv/video.php?id=449&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;follow this link to Bloggingheads.tv&lt;/a&gt;, where they also cover inequality, taxation, and gentrification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bloggingheads.tv, the video site where policy analysts, bloggers, and other pundits argue about politics and policy, was co-founded by New America  Senior Fellow&lt;strong&gt; Robert Wright&lt;/strong&gt;.  The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; recently partnered with Bloggingheads.tv to excerpt “diavlogs” on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html&quot;&gt;NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/mark_schmitt/recent_work">Mark Schmitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6258 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Planet of the Apes</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/planet_of_the_apes_5268</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week the mystery deepened: Why no space aliens? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday, scientists reported finding the most “Earthlike” planet ever, Gliese 581c. Its sun is cooler than ours, but also closer, so Gliese is in that climatic comfort zone conducive to water -- hence to life, hence to evolution, hence to intelligent beings with advanced technology. Yet they never phone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It’s actually a serious question, long pondered by sci-fi types. Since a civilization whose technological evolution was ahead of ours by even a few centuries could contact us from far, far away (and certainly from Gliese, a mere 20 light-years away), what&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/planet_of_the_apes_5268&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5268 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Neocon Paradox</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/the_neocon_paradox_5257</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neoconservatives have been airing an explanation for the failure of the Iraq war that’s so obvious you’ll wonder why you didn’t think of it yourself: the war wasn’t neoconservative enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last week Richard Perle, on The Charlie Rose Show, echoed what his fellow neocon John Bolton told the BBC last month: We should have turned Iraq over to the Iraqis much sooner. Then, presumably, the power of democracy to blossom pronto in even nutrient-depleted soil -- the neocon elan vital -- would have kicked in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice try, but they’re just digging themselves in deeper. They’re highlighting a paradox within the neocon game&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/the_neocon_paradox_5257&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5257 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Darwinism Isn&#039;t Depressing</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/why_darwinism_isnt_depressing_5245</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists have discovered that love is truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Granted, no scientist has put it quite like that. In fact, when scientists talk about love -- the neurochemistry, the evolutionary origins -- they make it sound unlovely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More broadly, our growing grasp of the biology behind our thoughts and feelings has some people downhearted. One commentator recently acknowledged the ascendancy of the Darwinian paradigm with a sigh: &quot;Evolution doesn&#039;t really lead to anything outside itself.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheer up! Despair is a plausible response to news that our loftiest feelings boil down to genetic self-interest, but genetic self-interest actually turns out to be our salvation. The selfishness&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/why_darwinism_isnt_depressing_5245&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5245 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>E-Mail and Prozac</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/e_mail_and_prozac_5193</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a theory: the more e-mail there is, the more Prozac there will be, and the more Prozac there is, the more e-mail there will be. Maybe I should explain. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twenty millenniums ago, communication was simple. Utterances were usefully accompanied by nonverbal cues: tone of voice, facial expression, nudging your fellow hunter-gatherer in the ribs upon reaching a punch line. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twenty years ago, communication was still pretty simple. Much of it was by phone -- no nudging, true, but intonation could help distinguish, say, wry irony from bitter resentment. Plus, when you asked a question, the answer came in&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/e_mail_and_prozac_5193&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5193 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shock Talk Without Apologies</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/shock_talk_without_apologies_5183</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There has to be an Imus event every once in a while. Ethnicity being the volatile thing it is, gratuitously inflammatory remarks have to be discouraged, so bounds of acceptable speech have to be clarified. Clarity comes when, inevitably, someone oversteps and gets slapped down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe this particular boundary could have been clarified with less punishment, given how abjectly Don Imus has apologized. Still, there had to be a price, and, compared with the prices paid in some multiethnic societies (remember Yugoslavia?), this is a bargain. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But is America’s machinery for stigmatizing bigotry really working coherently? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If social harmony is the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/shock_talk_without_apologies_5183&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/racism">Racism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5183 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Making The U.N. Look Good</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/making_the_u_n_look_good_5144</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United Nations. Among mainstream American political thinkers, those three words elicit reactions that run the gamut from deep antipathy to less deep antipathy. O.K., I’m overstating the case. Many liberals will go all the way to deep ambivalence, and some venture further. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, even defenders of the institution can’t seem to start a defense of it without half-apologizing and ritually reciting its structural flaws. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today I’ll break new ground by saving the recitation of flaws for last. First, let’s celebrate an underacknowledged feat. During a crucial phase of history -- the run-up to the Iraq war -- the United&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/making_the_u_n_look_good_5144&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5144 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An Easter Sermon</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/an_easter_sermon_5132</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jesus knew viral marketing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the Gospel of Mark, the disciple John complains that nondisciples are selling bootlegged copies of Jesus’ miraculous powers. ‘‘Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he was not following us.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jesus tells John to quit obsessing about the intellectual property and to focus on getting the brand out. ‘‘Do not stop him; for no one who does a deed of power in my name will be able soon afterward to speak evil of me.” Jesus adds, ‘‘Whoever is not against us is for us.” &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fast-forward two&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/an_easter_sermon_5132&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5132 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My Life in the Army</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/my_life_in_the_army_5097</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In one sense, I was well positioned to enjoy the summer of love. In 1969, I was living in San Francisco, epicenter of hippiedom, antiwar fervor and utopian hope for perpetual peace. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Circumstances kept me from sharing the spirit. The part of San Francisco I lived in was the Presidio, which was then a military base. I was 12, and my father was an Army officer. I remember my family once driving toward the Presidio’s Lombard Street gate past tens of thousands of protesters who seemed to think my father was part of a very bad outfit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was sure they&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/my_life_in_the_army_5097&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5097 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How We Make Life-and-Death Decisions</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/how_we_make_life_and_death_decisions_4679</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Morality is more properly felt than judged of; though this feeling or sentiment is commonly so soft and gentle, that we are apt to confound it with an idea.&amp;quot;-- David Hume, Scottish philosopher &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;****&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When it came to moral &amp;quot;reasoning,&amp;quot; David Hume emphasized the quotation marks. We like to think our views on right and wrong are rational, he said, but ultimately they are grounded in emotion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Philosophers have argued over this claim for a quarter of a millennium without resolution. Time’s up! Now scientists armed with brain scanners are stepping in to settle the matter. So far it looks&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/how_we_make_life_and_death_decisions_4679&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/156">TIME Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4679 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New York Sun Profiles Robert Wright&#039;s BloggingHeads.tv</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/robert_wrights_bloggingheads_tv_profiled_by_the_new_york_sun</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With a droll, self-deprecating demeanor, &lt;strong&gt;Robert Wright&lt;/strong&gt; engages a smiling Mickey Kaus each week in a conversation broadcast on their Web site, Bloggingheads.tv. Their running quarrel has attracted a growing number of Web users who want to see rather than merely read bloggers — and who appreciate the efforts to wrestle with the issues of the day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mr. Wright, a lean, neatly dressed fellow with a slightly dyspeptic online persona, is more liberal than Mr. Kaus. The founder of the blog Kausfiles is a more lying-in-the-reeds, crocodilian type who describes himself a conservative Democrat. Even this is open to debate, Mr. Wright says: &amp;quot;There&amp;#39;s widespread suspicion that his claim to be a conservative Democrat is less than completely forthcoming...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Popular bloggers, Mr. Wright said, tend to have followings of people who are curious about what they look like. Enter Bloggingheads.tv. The company logo features a stick-figure illustration with a head inside a television monitor walking on two feet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are no commercial breaks, allowing the bloggers an in-depth and open-ended coverage of the issues. The subject matter — a mix of politics and some culture — makes the Webcast appear as though employees of the New Republic or the American Prospect had taken over a local news station and set up shop to discuss their differences with the National Review and the American Spectator.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Their Web site grew out of long phone conversations between Messrs. Wright and Kaus. &amp;quot;I found them very productive,&amp;quot; Mr. Kaus said. &amp;quot;I always thought the talks were actually more useful than anything I write.&amp;quot; They started the site with hopes that nuanced, open-ended discussion could reach a level of analysis beyond that of daily newspapers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From his home in California, Mr. Kaus appears on a split screen alongside Mr. Wright, who is in New Jersey. They are sometimes informally attired, and in the background one can see such things as bookcases, filing cabinets, and air-conditioners. Mr. Wright&amp;#39;s remarks are sometimes punctuated by gulps from a plastic cup or a roll of his eyes at Mr. Kaus&amp;#39;s latest point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At times, the video feed makes it feel like one is watching slow-motion NASA footage. Mr. Wright recalled the time a barking dog was heard in the background. But visitors to the site may be witnessing the beginnings of a new information and entertainment form, a kind of a garage band, so to speak, which could eventually fill a stadium. The Web site already draws about 150,000 visitors a month...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please visit &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nysun.com/article/43354?page_no=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The New York Sun&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/em&gt;website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/213">The New York Sun</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/media">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4372 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Foreign Policy That Both Realists and Idealists Should Love</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/a_foreign_policy_that_both_realists_and_idealists_should_love</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As liberals try to articulate a post-Bush foreign policy, some are feeling a bit of cognitive dissonance. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They have always thought of themselves as idealistic, concerned with the welfare of humankind. Not for them the ruthlessly narrow focus on national self-interest of the &amp;quot;realist&amp;quot; foreign policy school. That school’s most famous practitioner, Henry Kissinger, is for many liberals a reminder of how easily the ostensible amorality of classic realism slides into immorality. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet idealism has lost some of its luster. Neoconservatism, whose ascendancy has scared liberals into a new round of soul-searching, seems plenty idealistic, bent on spreading democracy and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/a_foreign_policy_that_both_realists_and_idealists_should_love&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/39">Best of 2006</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3770 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BusinessWeek Profiles Robert Wright&#039;s BloggingHeads.tv</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/pressroom/2006/businessweek_profiles_robert_wrights_bloggingheads</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-body-copy&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;New America in the News:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I may borrow someone else&amp;#39;s adaptation, soon everyone will be famous for 15 people on the Web. That can even be where wider-world fame starts, because the Net is both farm team and idea incubator from which traditional players steal new notions and talent...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Middle-aged pundits Mickey Kaus, author of the long-running blog kausfiles, and &lt;strong&gt;Robert Wright&lt;/strong&gt;, a senior fellow at the centrist think tank New America Foundation, will never get massive on MySpace. But Wright&amp;#39;s site bloggingheads.tv, on which he and Kaus tangle remotely via webcams on matters political, may portend a next generation of political talk shows. &amp;quot;In theory,&amp;quot; Wright says, &amp;quot;narrower niche audiences should work now.&amp;quot; Not that he has tested a business model yet. Bloggingheads launched last November and is ad-free, though Wright says if the audience keeps growing, a partner or investor and then -- gasp -- ads could follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The site is so strenuously devoted to eggheadedness that the aside &amp;quot;you are turning into Senator Moynihan&amp;quot; works as a joking inside reference to the late, famously erudite and self-referential New York pol. (Perhaps you had to be there.) Bloggingheads airs two or three hour-long face-offs each week, with Wright and Kaus appearing in tandem on one of them. But if the site has stars, it&amp;#39;s them. &amp;quot;Star,&amp;quot; in this context, doesn&amp;#39;t mean Katie Couric. Here, the talent wear ungainly dangling earpieces, guzzle take-out coffee, and gnaw bagels on air. At times it&amp;#39;s not entirely clear on these &amp;quot;diavlogs&amp;quot; whether Kaus has changed out of the sweatshirt he slept in the night before. &amp;quot;We wanted to distinguish this from what you see on TV,&amp;quot; says the reliably deadpan Wright. &amp;quot;One way of driving the point home immediately is the fact we look like [expletive].&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite, or because of, these reasons, bloggingheads is great. It&amp;#39;s smarter than the networks&amp;#39; Sunday morning talking-points recitations and more engaging than PBS&amp;#39; high-minded fare. What could be the future of political talk is so creaky and homemade it resembles public-access TV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The point is,&amp;quot; says Kaus, &amp;quot;if I were having a phone conversation with Bob, this is what it would be like...&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the complete article, please visit &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_27/b3991024.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;BusinessWeek&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; online.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/323">BusinessWeek</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4272 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>They Hate Us, They Really Hate Us</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/they_hate_us_they_really_hate_us</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
You wouldn&amp;#39;t expect to find good news for President Bush in a book by Andrew Kohut, a pollster and commentator who seems to divide his time between quantifying America&amp;#39;s Bush-era plunge in the world&amp;#39;s esteem and quantifying Bush&amp;#39;s plunge in America&amp;#39;s esteem. Then again, you also wouldn&amp;#39;t expect to find good news for President Bush in a book by Julia E. Sweig, a liberal senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. But Sweig&amp;#39;s Friendly Fire joins Kohut&amp;#39;s America Against the World (written with the columnist Bruce Stokes) in showing that Bush isn&amp;#39;t the only one to blame for the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/they_hate_us_they_really_hate_us&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/books">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_opinion">Public Opinion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 16:20:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3699 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Silent Treatment</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_silent_treatment</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The American left and right don&#039;t agree on much, but weeks of demonstrations and embassy burnings have pushed them toward convergence on one point: there is, if not a clash of civilizations, at least a very big gap between the &quot;Western world&quot; and the &quot;Muslim world.&quot; When you get beyond this consensus -- the cultural chasm consensus -- and ask what to do about the problem, there is less agreement. After all, chasms are hard to bridge.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, this chasm&#039;s size is being exaggerated. The Muslim uproar over those Danish cartoons isn&#039;t as alien to American culture as we&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/the_silent_treatment&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/39">Best of 2006</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1149 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Will Globalization Make Hatred More Lethal?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/will_globalization_make_hatred_more_lethal</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Link found between hatred and killing&quot; is not a headline that would sell many newspapers. But you might turn a few heads with &quot;Link between hatred and killing changes in ominous way.&quot; Or--to put a finer point on it--&quot;Ratio of killing to hatred slated to rise.&quot; This is one of the biggest stories of the last 30 years and, probably, the next 30 years: the growing lethality of hatred.  &lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;p&gt;Why has terrorism become public enemy number one? The most common answer--the rise of a brand of radical Islam that uses terror as its weapon -- -is true insofar&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/will_globalization_make_hatred_more_lethal&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/64">The Wilson Quarterly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3476 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Terror in the Past And Future Tense</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/terror_in_the_past_and_future_tense</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Timothy McVeigh&amp;#39;s bombing of the federal office building in Oklahoma City seems as if it happened less than 10 years ago, but its 10th anniversary, which happened a week ago, seems as if it didn&amp;#39;t happen at all. And for practical purposes it didn&amp;#39;t. Lots of stories made a bigger ripple in the week&amp;#39;s zeitgeist -- some of them understandably (new pope chosen), some less so (on &amp;#39;&amp;#39;American Idol,&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Anwar&amp;#39;s journey ends). &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This attention deficit is partly explained by what took place in Lower Manhattan six years after the bombing. Osama bin Laden&amp;#39;s atrocity dwarfed Timothy McVeigh&amp;#39;s along&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/terror_in_the_past_and_future_tense&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wmd">WMD</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1197 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Market Shall Set You Free</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_market_shall_set_you_free</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week President Bush again laid out a faith-based view of the world and again took heat for it. Human history, the president said in his inaugural address, &amp;quot;has a visible direction, set by liberty and the author of liberty.&amp;quot; Accordingly, America will pursue &amp;quot;the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world&amp;quot; -- and Mr. Bush has &amp;quot;complete confidence&amp;quot; of success. Critics on the left and right warned against grounding foreign policy in such nanve optimism (a world without tyrants?) and such unbounded faith. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But the problem with the speech is actually the opposite. Mr. Bush has&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_market_shall_set_you_free&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/19">Global Middle Class Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1180 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Faith, Hope and Clarity</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/faith_hope_and_clarity</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bush administration is suddenly taking pains to calibrate the president&#039;s devoutness: yes, Mr. Bush is very religious, but he&#039;s not too religious -- not hearing-voices religious.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Last week several White House aides insisted that, contrary to the witness of the televangelist Pat Robertson, the president never said God had guaranteed him a low casualty count in Iraq. And as for those reports about Mr. Bush feeling summoned to the presidency: Laura Bush denies that her husband sees himself as a divine instrument. &#039;&#039;It&#039;s not a faith where he hears from God,&#039;&#039; she said a few days ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s hard to settle&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/faith_hope_and_clarity&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/40">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2728 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>War on Evil</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/war_on_evil</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Evil has a reputation for resilience. And rightly so. Banishing it from Middle Earth alone took three very long Lord of the Rings movies. But equally deserving of this reputation is the concept of evil -- in particular, a conception of evil that was on display in those very movies: the idea that behind all the world&amp;#39;s bad deeds lies a single, dark, cosmic force. No matter how many theologians reject this idea, no matter how incompatible it seems with modern science, it keeps coming back. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You would have thought St. Augustine rid the world of it a millennium&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/war_on_evil&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/robert_wright/recent_work">Robert Wright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/104">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1082 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
