<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Foreign Policy: The Latest From New America</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/issues/7/policy</link>
 <description>Key Issues - Policy Docs</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Sovereign Wealth Funds: Foreign Policy Consequences In an Era Of New Money</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/sovereign_wealth_funds_foreign_policy_consequences_era_new_money</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Over the past several months, few issues in international finance have generated as much discussion and comment as have Sovereign Wealth Funds (“SWF”s). This Committee deserves enormous credit for recognizing the potentially significant foreign policy consequences of the rapid accumulation by foreign governments of enormous, growing pools of capital. These large concentrations of government controlled wealth raise complex issues that transcend traditional boundaries between foreign policy, financial markets, international economics and national security.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It is my belief, however, that too much focus on SWFs may, in fact, divert attention from the more fundamental foreign policy issue that these funds have come&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/sovereign_wealth_funds_foreign_policy_consequences_era_new_money&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/douglas_rediker/recent_work">Douglas Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1073">Global Strategic Finance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Sovereign_Wealth_Funds_Foreign_Policy_Consequences_in_an_Era_of_New_Money.pdf" length="62117" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7278 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Comments on the Proposed Regulations On Foreign Investment Into the U.S.</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/public_comment_department_treasury_regarding_proposed_regulations_foreign_investment_us</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Honorable Nova Daly
Deputy Assistant Secretary
U.S. Department of the Treasury
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Dear Mr. Daly:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We are pleased to submit these comments with respect to the recently proposed regulations regarding the implementation of the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 (“FINSA”) amendments to Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (“Exon-Florio”).
&lt;/p&gt;
Background
&lt;p&gt;
As a general matter, we believe that U.S. and global economic health are strengthened by the free flow of investment capital and by the increased liquidity that open markets provide. As significant providers of capital, foreign investors have thus far been a positive influence on U.S. markets and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/public_comment_department_treasury_regarding_proposed_regulations_foreign_investment_us&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/douglas_rediker/recent_work">Douglas Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/heidi_crebo_rediker/recent_work">Heidi Crebo-Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1073">Global Strategic Finance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Public_Comments_on_the_Proposed_Regulations_On_Foreign_Investment_Into_the_US.pdf" length="57198" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:38:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7274 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Financing America’s Infrastructure</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/financing_americas_infrastructure</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
America’s basic infrastructure is outdated, worn, and in some cases, failing. Most experts agree that it is inadequate for meeting the demands of the 21st-century global economy. If we are to remain competitive, we must invest in capital assets like roads, ports, bridges, mass transit, water systems, and broadband infrastructure. Many other countries -- both rich and poor -- see investing in infrastructure as imperative for economic survival and success in an increasingly competitive economic environment. But the United States has lagged in infrastructure investment, in both relative and absolute terms. We are spending less than 2 percent of GDP&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/financing_americas_infrastructure&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/douglas_rediker/recent_work">Douglas Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/heidi_crebo_rediker/recent_work">Heidi Crebo-Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1073">Global Strategic Finance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/public_infrastructure">Public Infrastructure</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Financing_America_Infrastructure.PDF" length="187619" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7271 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Iraq War Spurs Growth in Vehicle Manufacturing and Fuel Supply Contracts</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/iraq_war_spurs_growth_vehicle_manufacturing_and_fuel_supply_contracts</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have spurred strong growth in Pentagon prime contract 
awards to companies involved in armored vehicle production and fuel supply. In the mean time, major 
arms makers like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman have experienced much more modest 
growth rates. 
&lt;/p&gt;

Armored Vehicle Makers Benefit Most

&lt;p&gt;
A New America Foundation analysis of the Department of Defense&#039;s top ten contractors for FY 2007 found that the greatest increase by far from the prior year was posted by BAE Systems, which purchased Armor Holdings Inc., producer of the Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle (MRAP), in July of 2007. BAE&#039;s&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/iraq_war_spurs_growth_vehicle_manufacturing_and_fuel_supply_contracts&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/10">National Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/PBTop100AnalysisReport200806.pdf" length="40612" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:59:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7259 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nuclear Bailout</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/nuclear_bailout</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Department of Energy (DOE) plans to undertake an extensive, multi-billion dollar investment in new nuclear weapons facilities and new nuclear warhead designs. The initiative, known as “Complex Transformation,” is unnecessary on strategic and technical grounds, not to mention exorbitantly expensive. The various plans being considered by the DOE have more to do with bailing out the nuclear weapons industry than they do with determining what size complex makes sense in an era of nuclear arms reductions. At a minimum, current proposals should be put on hold until the new president taking office in January 2009 has a chance to&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/nuclear_bailout&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/william_d_hartung/recent_work">William D. Hartung</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1038">Arms and Security Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wmd">WMD</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Nuclear_Bailout.pdf" length="121306" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6952 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do Sovereign Wealth Funds Make the U.S. Economy Stronger or Pose National Security Risks?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/do_sovereign_wealth_funds_make_u_s_economy_stronger_or_pose_national_security_risks</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
By
way of introduction, I spent most of the last seventeen years working as an
investment banker and private equity investor based primarily in London, England.
This experience, I believe, gives me a somewhat different perspective on Sovereign
Wealth Funds and the role that they play in today’s international capital
markets. Currently, I co-direct the Global Strategic Finance Initiative at the New America Foundation. The New
America Foundation is a non-profit, post-partisan public
policy institute in Washington
D.C.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Over
the past several months, few issues in international finance have generated as
much discussion and comment as have Sovereign Wealth Funds. I commend you and
your colleagues for the informed and balanced views&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/do_sovereign_wealth_funds_make_u_s_economy_stronger_or_pose_national_security_risks&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/douglas_rediker/recent_work">Douglas Rediker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1073">Global Strategic Finance Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Doug Rediker JEC testimony 2-13-08.pdf" length="55737" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Economic Growth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6719 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is The United States Losing Turkey?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/is_the_united_states_losing_turkey</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On February 5th and 6th, 2007, the Hudson Institute, with support from the Smith Richardson Foundation, convened a small workshop of noted specialists on Turkey, Europe, and international security to assess the state of America’s alliance with Turkey and, more specifically, to ascertain whether the United States risks “losing” Turkey as a long-time and critical ally.  The workshop was part of a project directed by Rajan Menon, Professor of International Relations at Lehigh University and Fellow at the New America Foundation.  S. Enders Wimbush, Director of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/is_the_united_states_losing_turkey&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/rajan_menon/recent_work">Rajan Menon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/european_union">Europe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/middle_east">Middle East</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/nato">NATO</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/MenonWorkPaper.pdf" length="321110" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5057 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Terrorism: A Brief for Americans</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/terrorism_a_brief_for_americans</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Introduction&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;On November 7, 2006 Americans went to the polls and registered a deep concern on the course of the war in Iraq. For months ahead of the mid-term elections, they understood what leaders in the White House refused to acknowledge: A region spiraling downward in violence and bloodshed. American troops with no exit strategy. Most horrific of all, U.S. soldiers—America’s finest—tortured, killed and mutilated in a war making no observable progress in achieving the promised reduction in terrorism. &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/terrorism_a_brief_for_americans&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/906">American Respect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/terrorism">Terrorism</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4759 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dealing with Tehran</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/dealing_with_tehran</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This report by Flynt Leverett, director of New America&amp;#39;s Geopolitics of Energy Initiative within the American Strategy Program, was commissioned by The Century Foundation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The complete document is available via The Century Foundation website at http://www.tcf.org/list.asp?type=PB&amp;amp;pubid=595.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/flynt_leverett/recent_work_0">Flynt Leverett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/874">The Century Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/725">Middle East Policy Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iran">Iran</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4533 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Beyond Dominance</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/beyond_dominance</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The central idea underlying American grand strategy since the end of the Cold War has been dominance -- the notion that the United States is so powerful and virtuous that it can pretty much remake the world on its own terms. For most of its two terms in office, the Clinton administration pursued a form of soft dominance, in that it sought to legitimize its policies through America&#039;s traditional alliances and through the use of international bodies like the International Monetary Fund.  The Bush administration has opted for a more explicit form of dominance, arguing that the United States&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/beyond_dominance&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sherle_r_schwenninger/recent_work">Sherle R. Schwenninger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3563 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Population Implosion</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/the_population_implosion</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A NEW CHALLENGE FACES THE WORLD.  It is not a problem that can be photographed, reduced to a sound bite, or rendered into the conventional formulations of Left and Right.  It has everything to do with sex, death, money, and power, yet is rarely the subject of a headline.  Rather, its reality dwells beneath the surface of everyday events, in the realm of what historian Arnold Toynbee once called the &quot;deeper, slower movements that, in the end, make history.&quot;  The trend, if properly managed, presents many positive opportunities for mankind, but also poses deep risks to&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/the_population_implosion&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3565 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Opportunity Missed</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/opportunity_missed</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FROM THE MOMENT the Berlin Wall came down, a succession of U.S. presidents used American economic, military, and cultural primacy as leverage to build a new global system incorporating both the former communist countries and the developing nations of the global South.  Over the course of the next decade, America&#039;s leaders phased out the Pax Americana alliance system in Europe and East Asia -- a Temporary Cold War measure -- and replaced it with a global great-power concert. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In Europe, the U.S. administrations that came to power after the end of the Cold War transformed NATO by adding post-Soviet&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/opportunity_missed&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3564 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democracy in the Islamic World</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/democracy_in_the_islamic_world</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IN A REMARKABLE SPEECH at the National Endowment for Democracy in November 2003, President Bush acknowledged 60 years of American error and announced a policy of encouraging democracy, not dictatorship, in the Muslim world.  Whether this long overdue message is followed by an actual policy change or simply results from the short-term need to explain the Iraq war in the absence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) remains to be seen. But in any event, Bush neglected to mention a crucial fact that looms over every discussion of democratization in the Muslim world: if freed to make their own&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/democracy_in_the_islamic_world&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/noah_feldman/recent_work">Noah Feldman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/afghanistan">Afghanistan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/religion">Religion</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3566 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>American Strategy Project  -- Grand Strategy No.2</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/american_strategy_project_grand_strategy_no_2</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear Colleagues:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Secretary of State Colin Powell endorsed a ground-breaking idea for the reform of Iraq put forth by my colleague Steve Clemons, Executive Vice President of the New America Foundation and Co-Director of the American Strategy Project. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In the April 9th edition of the New York Times, Steve suggested that the Alaska Permanent Fund, which provides a share of state oil revenues directly to Alaskan citizens, could be a model for a similar program adopted by a new Iraqi government chosen by the Iraqi people. As Iraq&amp;#39;s society recovers from decades of dictatorship and&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/american_strategy_project_grand_strategy_no_2&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/iraq">Iraq</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1584 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>American Strategy Project -- Grand Strategy No.1</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/american_strategy_project_grand_strategy_no_1</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;The United States is now more isolated from its major allies and more internally    divided over foreign policy than at any time since 1945. The strategy of the    Bush administration -- and not merely its style -- is to blame.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;The grand strategy of the Bush administration rests on three axioms: American    global hegemony; preventive war; and the so-called &amp;quot;war on terror.&amp;quot;    All three axioms are fallacies that inevitably produce counterproductive and    misguided policies. What the great French diplomat Talleyrand said of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/american_strategy_project_grand_strategy_no_1&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/14">American Strategy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/7">Foreign Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>American Strategy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1580 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
