<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Education: The Latest From New America</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/issues/2/policy</link>
 <description>Key Issues - Policy Docs</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How Much Does the Federal Government Spend To Promote Economic Mobility, And For Whom?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/how_much_does_federal_government_spend_promote_economic_mobility_and_whom</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In an economically mobile market economy, individuals and families are able to raise their private incomes, wealth, and ability (sometimes referred to as human capital) over time and across generations. In the United States, many associate economic mobility with the pursuit of the American Dream. Education, work experience, and saving enhance the opportunity for upward economic mobility. To this end, many federal spending and tax expenditure or tax subsidy programs
aim to enhance economic mobility. But exactly how much does the federal government encourage economic mobility? What form does this encouragement take? And who benefits from these efforts?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To begin answering these&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/how_much_does_federal_government_spend_promote_economic_mobility_and_whom&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/adam_carasso/recent_work">Adam Carasso</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1286">Economic Mobility Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Economic_Mobility.pdf" length="338581" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fiscal Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7038 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Partners In Closing the Achievement Gap</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/partners_closing_achievement_gap</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Over the past eight years, states have dramatically expanded
their support for publicly-funded pre-k programs, and the number of children
enrolled in these programs has grown significantly. States are investing in
pre-k because research shows that high-quality pre-kindergarten programs can
have a positive long-term impact on children’s life outcomes, help narrow the
achievement gap between poor and affluent youngsters, and that the benefits of
these invest­ments to children and the taxpaying public outweigh their costs.
In other words, high-quality pre-k is a key weapon in the arsenal of public
policies that we can use to combat pov­erty and inequality and strengthen the
skills of our workforce for the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/partners_closing_achievement_gap&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sara_mead/recent_work">Sara Mead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1270">Democrats for Education Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/32">Early Education Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Partners_In_Closing_the_Achievement_Gap.pdf" length="910120" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6951 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Primer on the Budget Resolution’s Impact on Education Funding</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/primer_budget_resolution_s_impact_education_funding</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The budget resolution put forward by Congress each year -- which sets out the congressional budget plan for the next five years -- and the ensuing budget process itself are enormously significant for education funding. However, the arcane procedures under which Congress produces and acts upon the budget resolution are often confusing to the media and education advocates alike. This confusion is made worse by political rhetoric and partisan spin. This brief by the New America Foundation’s Federal Education Budget Project is meant to shed light on how the budget resolution affects education funding. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This primer clarifies certain aspects of the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/primer_budget_resolution_s_impact_education_funding&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jason_delisle/recent_work">Jason Delisle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/FEBP_Budget_Resolution_Primer.pdf" length="94723" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6879 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Analysis of Bush’s Education Budget Request</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/analysis_president_bush_s_education_budget_request</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
President George W. Bush submitted his eighth and final budget request to the Congress on Monday. Under the proposal, fiscal year 2009 discretionary spending—spending subject to annual appropriations—would be at the same level as in the prior year for domestic programs and agencies not involved in homeland security efforts. The budget request for the Department of Education fits this general theme. Fiscal year 2009 discretionary spending at the Department of Education would total $59.2 billion, the same level of funding provided in 2008. Despite requesting level funding for the agency as a whole, the administration proposes increases for a number&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/analysis_president_bush_s_education_budget_request&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/295">CRFB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/FEBP_Bush_Budget_Analysis_FY09.pdf" length="86469" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6695 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ten Questions on the Bush Education Budget Request</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/ten_questions_bush_education_budget</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
K-12 EDUCATION
&lt;p&gt;
1) The administration proposes increasing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Title I grants to school districts by 2.9 percent, essentially an increase matching inflation. It also proposes redirecting a greater proportion of Title I funds to high schools. Does this mean that school districts will have to cut Title I funding for K-8 schools, since districts will effectively receive the same level of funding as in the previous year? How will this affect the student achievement in grades 3 through 8? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
2) The administration’s budget proposes shifting $100 million from the NCLB’s Title II &amp;quot;Improving Teacher Quality State Grants&amp;quot;&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/ten_questions_bush_education_budget&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/FEBP_10_Questions_Bush_Budget_FY09.pdf" length="47209" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6661 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Bush Education Budget Legacy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/bush_education_budget_legacy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Next week, President George W. Bush will submit his eighth and final budget request to the Congress. How has he fared with respect to education budget proposals thus far? Answer: although President Bush made the No Child Left Behind Act, which deals with elementary and secondary education, the hallmark of his education policy, from a federal education budget standpoint, the Bush administration’s most lasting legacy thus far is in higher education. The New America Foundation’s Federal Education Budget Project evaluated all the Bush administration&#039;s past budget requests and finds that the Bush administration has had relatively little success in enacting its&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/bush_education_budget_legacy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/heather_rieman/recent_work">Heather Rieman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jason_delisle/recent_work">Jason Delisle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/FEBP_Bush_Education_Budget_Legacy.pdf" length="172785" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:20:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6632 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Advance Appropriations</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/advance_appropriations</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;
The Congressional Democratic majority has made increasing education funding a priority in its fiscal year 2008 spending plan. Their Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies (Labor-H) appropriations conference agreement proposes increases in education for fiscal year 2008 that, if enacted, would result in one of the largest year-over-year increases (in nominal terms) in Department of Education funding since the No Child Left Behind Act was passed in 2002. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;
Congress would like for much of the proposed increase in education funding, however, not to occur in fiscal year 2008, the time period covered by the current&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/advance_appropriations&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jason_delisle/recent_work">Jason Delisle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/FEBP_Advance_Appropriations.pdf" length="620752" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6375 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>10 New Ideas for Early Education in the NCLB Reauthorization</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/10_new_ideas_early_education_nclb_reauthorization</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) seeks to improve student learning and narrow academic achievement gaps that place low-income and minority students at a disadvantage relative to their affluent and white peers. Evidence shows that the roots of children’s academic success or failure are already firmly in place by third grade and as much as half of the black-white achievement gap already exists before children enter first grade. Therefore, to achieve its ambitious goals NCLB must do a much better job of catalyzing and supporting state and local efforts to improve children’s education in the preschool and early elementary&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/10_new_ideas_early_education_nclb_reauthorization&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/sara_mead/recent_work">Sara Mead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/32">Early Education Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/24">Workforce and Family Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/10 New Ideas Issue for Early Ed in the NCLB Reauthorization.pdf" length="92354" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6377 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Budget Showdown 2007: The Facts Behind Education Funding</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/budget_showdown_2007_facts_behind_education_funding</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The White House and Congress are approaching a major budget debate that could markedly influence federal education funding. This is the first budget cycle since 2000 during which different political parties control the Executive Branch and both chambers of Congress. The federal budget and appropriations process is rarely without acrimony, but this year’s battle may be especially rancorous. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Federal Education Budget Project finds that although Congress plans a significant increase in federal spending on schools, teachers, and students -- the most significant this decade when considering discretionary and mandatory sources -- education funding has not been a driver of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/budget_showdown_2007_facts_behind_education_funding&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/heather_rieman/recent_work">Heather Rieman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/education_funding">Education Funding</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Budget Showdown Issue Brief Final 10-12-07.pdf" length="146012" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6046 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Key to NCLB Success: Getting it Right From the Start</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/key_nclb_success_getting_it_right_start</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&lt;p&gt;Access to quality pre-kindergarten (PK) programs varies widely among and within states. While PK enrollment is growing, large disparities in access and quality threaten to undermine the capacity of early childhood education to close achievement gaps. Research shows that at-risk children can catch up to their non-disadvantaged peers by participating in highquality PK programs that are linked to K-3 structures. However, fewer than half of children ages 3 and 4 engage in some type of early childhood education—before quality is taken into account.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Standards and instruction must be aligned from PK through Grade 3 to maximize the advantages of preschool.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/key_nclb_success_getting_it_right_start&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/32">Early Education Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/IBPK3NCLBSuccess_0.pdf" length="153715" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5391 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New Markets Tax Credit</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/new_markets_tax_credit</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an era of declining federal resources dedicated to economic development, the New Markets Tax Credit stands out as a success story and a particular boon for metropolitan areas, which have received the majority of credits to date. Despite its complexity and initial doubts about whether it could be effectively implemented, it has shown signs of providing an important extra boost to many types of development in underserved urban and rural communities. As the program has developed, participants have become bolder and more creative in their uses of the Credit, and pushed more of the Credit’s limited subsidy into severely&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/new_markets_tax_credit&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ellen_seidman/recent_work">Ellen Seidman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1002">Living Cities</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/2007_04_22_NMTC_Policy_Paper_Seidman.pdf" length="129273" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asset Building</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5442 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A College Access Contract</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/a_college_access_contract</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

Click here for a brief video discussion of this idea.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;America&amp;#39;s financial aid system imposes too much debt on college graduates, provides too much taxpayer support to banks making college loans, and demands too little of students assuming them. A new &amp;quot;College Access Contract&amp;quot; would allow low-income students to graduate with zero federal student loan debt -- and middle-class students to graduate with interest-free federal student loan debt -- if they: &lt;/p&gt;Work hard in high school to prepare for college -- as evidenced by&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/a_college_access_contract&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_dannenberg/recent_work">Michael Dannenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/883">Federal Education Budget Project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/558">Video</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/NAF_10big_Ideas_6.pdf" length="110946" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4730 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rebuilding America&#039;s Productive Economy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/rebuilding_americas_productive_economy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt; From its inception as a nation, America&amp;#39;s great advantage over its global rivals has stemmed largely from the successful development of its vast interior. The Heartland has been both the incubator of national identity and an outlet for the entrepreneurial energies of both immigrants and those living in dense urban areas. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The term &amp;quot;Heartland&amp;quot; is commonly used to describe the region west of the Mississippi River and east of the Rocky Mountains. This region constitutes the primary focus of this report, although we believe our policy prescriptions also apply to other parts of the country that are culturally&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/rebuilding_americas_productive_economy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/joel_kotkin/recent_work">Joel Kotkin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/656">Economic Growth Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/12">Telecom &amp;amp; Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/NAF_HeartlandReport_F.pdf" length="533973" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4247 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Teacher Quality in Grades PK-3: Challenges and Options</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/teacher_quality_in_grades_pk_3_challenges_and_options</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) The PK-3 Workforce is Subject to an Array of Entry Standards. Public school teachers in grades K-3 must meet the quality standards of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Pre-kindergarten (PK) teachers in Title I-funded programs also are regulated by NCLB. But Head Start teachers have their own separate entry standards. In some state PK programs, all teachers must possess a bachelor’s degree and have engaged in additional early childhood or PK-3 training. In others, only a Child Development Associate certificate is required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) There are Approximately 1.5 Million Teachers in the PK-3 Workforce. New America&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/teacher_quality_in_grades_pk_3_challenges_and_options&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/justin_king/recent_work">Justin King</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/lindsey_luebchow/recent_work">Lindsey Luebchow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/32">Early Education Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/17">Education Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/PKIssueBriefNo4PDF.pdf" length="246597" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 01:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4217 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Closing the Achievement Gap</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/closing_the_achievement_gap</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A significant, albeit still insufficient, expansion of access to publicly supported early education programs for children ages 3 to 5 has occurred over the last decade. This trend bodes well for children at risk of academic failure, but is endangered by uneven, halting, and at times inadequate attention to program quality in grades prekindergarten through three.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;Expanded access to pre-kindergarten in recent years is primarily the result of individual state legislative, state agency, state executive, and state referendum efforts. States have pursued these efforts at different times, unequal rates, and with no coordinating effort from the federal government. (Much of&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/closing_the_achievement_gap&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/justin_king/recent_work">Justin King</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/32">Early Education Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Closing the Achievement Gap.pdf" length="327789" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3877 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>State Policy Options for Building Assets</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/state_policy_options_for_building_assets</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;States continue to play an important role in helping low- and moderate-resource families save and build wealth. They have been innovators in assets policy, whether on their own or through the forces of &amp;quot;devolution,&amp;quot; in which federal funds and decision-making authority are shifting from the federal to the state level. These initiatives and experiments -- these &amp;quot;laboratories of democracy&amp;quot; -- have inspired and informed other states as well as policymakers at the national level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following ideas to broaden savings and asset ownership include a range of simple proposals that may have a significant impact with little associated cost; some medium&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/state_policy_options_for_building_assets&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/leslie_parrish/recent_work">Leslie Parrish</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/housing">Housing</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Doc_File_3134_1.pdf" length="284061" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asset Building</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3750 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Policy Options to Improve Financial Education</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/policy_options_to_improve_financial_education</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorting through credit card offers, deciding how to invest retirement funds in the stock market, picking the right mortgage from a myriad of options, deciding how to save for a child&amp;#39;s college tuition—the scope and diversity of the financial decisions a family has to make has grown exponentially. Former Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan observed, &amp;quot;Today&amp;#39;s financial world is highly complex when compared with that of a generation ago. Forty years ago, a simple understanding of how to maintain a checking and savings account at local banks and savings institutions may have been sufficient. Now, consumers must be able to&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/policy_options_to_improve_financial_education&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/leslie_parrish/recent_work">Leslie Parrish</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Doc_File_3135_1.pdf" length="160168" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:01:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asset Building</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3751 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Attention Needs to be Paid to America&#039;s Workforce System</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/more_attention_needs_to_be_paid_to_americas_workforce_system</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why isn’t more attention paid to the need for a public and private sector revolution in job training? In the past few years, there has been much attention paid to improving America’s education system. By tradition and even by law, education is a state and local responsibility. However, education has seen a critical change over the past five years in terms of the federal role. The Republican Party has transformed from calling for a decreased federal role in education (many in 1994 wanted to abolish the Department of Education) to being a party of a new increased federal role. President&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/more_attention_needs_to_be_paid_to_americas_workforce_system&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/david_gray/recent_work">David Gray</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/24">Workforce and Family Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/archive/Doc_File_2924_1.pdf" length="10" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Workforce and Family</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1705 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Assets Report 2006</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/the_assets_report_2006</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second year of the Bush Administration’s second term is underway and the prospect of a large breakthrough for asset building policy appears remote at this time. The President’s second Inaugural Address, which highlighted the transformative potential of “ownership” and an “ownership society,” has given way to the political realities of budget deficits, international commitments, and uncertain electoral prospects.In this difficult political environment, a “dual track” strategy should be pursued: continuing to lay the foundation for larger, more ambitious asset-building policies while aggressively pursuing lower-cost policies that are poised to boost savings and asset accumulation by the poor&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/the_assets_report_2006&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/leslie_parrish/recent_work">Leslie Parrish</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ray_boshara/recent_work_0">Ray Boshara</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reid_cramer/recent_work">Reid Cramer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/tax_expenditures">Tax Expenditures</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/Doc_File_2916_1.pdf" length="141569" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asset Building</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ladders of Learning</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/ladders_of_learning</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s a good news, bad news situation. The good news is an increasing body of evidence shows that children’s participation in high quality pre-kindergarten (PK) programs helps them begin kindergarten ready to succeed.  Similarly, there is growing evidence that children who start kindergarten behind but participate in a full-day kindergarten (FDK) program catch up to their peers by the end one academic year. The bad news is these effects often appear to “fade out” over time. As children move through the primary grades (grades 1, 2, and 3), the progress they made in PK and FDK dissipates and they&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/policy/ladders_of_learning&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/142">New America Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/32">Early Education Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/2">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/archive/Doc_File_2826_1.pdf" length="10" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Education Policy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1694 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
