<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Retirement Security: All Articles and Books</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/issues/13/articles</link>
 <description>Articles View for Key Issues Aggregation Pages</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Tough Tax Questions for Presidential Candidates</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2008/tough_tax_questions_presidential_candidates_6800</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The current crop of Presidential candidates sound a lot like they did in prior years with promises of new targeted tax breaks, loophole closures, increased taxes on the rich and new spending programs. Have the candidates not read the doom and gloom budget reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and others? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The fiscal agenda for the next President and Congress must include some very difficult decisions that go beyond just tweaking the tax system. Below, we’ll look closer at some key fiscal issues that have tax implications. Questions are posed that could help gauge how&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2008/tough_tax_questions_presidential_candidates_6800&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/annette_nellen/recent_work">Annette Nellen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1236">The AICPA Tax Insider</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/elections_political_parties">Elections &amp;amp; Political Parties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/tax_expenditures">Tax Expenditures</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ron Tang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6800 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Five Myths About Sick Old Europe</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/five_myths_about_sick_old_europe_6070</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the global economy, today&amp;#39;s winners can become tomorrow&amp;#39;s losers in a twinkling, and vice versa. Not so long ago, American pundits and economic analysts were snidely touting U.S. economic superiority to the &amp;quot;sick old man&amp;quot; of Europe. What a difference a few months can make. Today, with the stock market jittery over Iraq, the mortgage crisis, huge budget and trade deficits, and declining growth in productivity, investors are wringing their hands about the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, analysts point to the roaring economies of China and India as the only bright spots on the global horizon. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; But what about&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/five_myths_about_sick_old_europe_6070&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/steven_hill/recent_work">Steven Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1102">Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/welfare">Welfare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6070 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Problem with GM&#039;s UAW Deal</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/problem_gms_uaw_deal_6056</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 1946, Peter Drucker’s intimate, multiyear examination of General Motors (GM), Concept of the Corporation, was published. GM hated it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Drucker’s take -- that the then-wildly-successful automaker might want to reexamine a host of long-standing policies on customer relations, dealer relations, employee relations, and more -- was viewed from inside the corporation as hypercritical. GM’s revered chairman, Alfred Sloan, was so upset about the book that he &amp;quot;simply treated it as if it did not exist,&amp;quot; Drucker later recalled, &amp;quot;never mentioning it and never allowing it to be mentioned in his presence.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The United Auto Workers didn’t exactly embrace Drucker’s thinking either.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/problem_gms_uaw_deal_6056&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/rick_wartzman/recent_work">Rick Wartzman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1088">BusinessWeek.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/unions">Unions</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:13:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6056 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New Economic Insecurity -- And What Can Be Done About It</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2007/the_new_economic_insecurity_and_what_can_be_done_about_it_4894</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past generation, the economic risks American families face have increased substantially. Yet public programs have largely failed to adapt to these new and newly intensified risks, and private workplace benefits have eroded. As a result, Americans increasingly find themselves on an economic tightrope, without an adequate safety net if, as is ever more likely, they lose their footing. This tightrope both creates anxiety about the future and causes hardship when families do lose their balance. But importantly, it also threatens opportunity by making it more difficult for families to feel sufficiently secure to look confidently toward the future&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2007/the_new_economic_insecurity_and_what_can_be_done_about_it_4894&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/926">Harvard Law &amp;amp; Policy Review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/995">Next Social Contract</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/economic_insecurity">Economic Insecurity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/913">Best of 2007</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newamerica.net/files/The New Economic Insecurity_And What Can Be Done About It.pdf" length="126741" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:56:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4894 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s Not the Economy, Stupid</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/its_not_the_economy_stupid_4250</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the final days of this fall’s campaign, Republicans have turned to an unexpected issue: the economy. President Bush touted the nation’s prosperity last week, insisting that &amp;quot;a strong economy is going to help our candidates.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And why not? The Dow is soaring. Unemployment is low. Inflation is tame. Gas prices are falling. And the overall economy has been growing steadily. If Americans practice what political scientists call &amp;quot;retrospective voting&amp;quot; (captured by President Ronald Reagan’s famous question: &amp;quot;Are you better off today than you were four years ago?&amp;quot;), then one would think that incumbent politicians should be cruising to victory.&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/its_not_the_economy_stupid_4250&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/44">The Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:50:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4250 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Great Risk Shift</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/books/the_great_risk_shift</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt; America&amp;#39;s leaders say the economy is strong and getting stronger. But ordinary Americans aren&amp;#39;t buying it. They see what the rosy statistics hide: We are all struggling under the weight of terrifying economic instability. No matter how well educated and hard working we are, we know that the bottom can fall out at any moment. Meanwhile, the safety net that once protected us is fast unraveling. With retirement plans in growing jeopardy while health coverage erodes, more and more economic risk is shifting from government and business onto the fragile shoulders of the American family. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; In  &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/books/the_great_risk_shift&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/777">Oxford University Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>adminn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4140 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Real Issue is Risk</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_real_issue_is_risk</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having just finished a book entitled The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement -- And How You Can Fight Back, I have no doubt that Stephen Rose will accuse me of offering a &amp;quot;message of misery.&amp;quot; My defense, already laid out in greater length on the website of &amp;quot;The Democratic Strategist&amp;quot; in response to three of Rose’s colleagues, is that political candidates and leaders should, first and foremost, offer a message of truth. And the truth is that, after a generation in which more and more economic risks have been shifted onto the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/the_real_issue_is_risk&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/772">The American Prospect Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wages">Wages</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:13:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4089 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New Biopolitics</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/the_new_biopolitics</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will globalization destroy itself? Every few years, another crisis suggests it might. The Internet, satellite phones, and intercontinental air travel help terrorists cross the world in an instant. The global spread of democracy shakes authoritarian governments -- and opens the way for Islamists in Tehran and Cairo, a populist strongman in Venezuela, and nuke-happy nationalists in New Delhi. Open capital markets wreck the economies of Southeast Asia. Divisions between Muslim immigrants and the rest of Europe explode in French riots and Dutch assassinations. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;These unhappy stories are familiar by now. An open, mobile, interconnected world creates new threats,&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/the_new_biopolitics&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jedediah_purdy/recent_work">Jedediah Purdy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/664">Democracy: A Journal of Ideas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/38">Cover Story</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 22:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3742 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Labour Shortage Can Be a Blessing, Not a Curse</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/a_labour_shortage_can_be_a_blessing_not_a_curse</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do rich nations need more poor workers? The answer is yes, according to the conventional wisdom, which finds expression in a new United Nations report on migration and development. The UN says that in developed nations 10 years from now there will be only 87 young entrants to the labour force for every 100 retirees. To forestall a labour shortage in the developed world, the report says that rich nations should turn to developing countries, which will have 342 new labour market entrants for every 100 first world retirees.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This assumes that a labour shortage in the developed world is an&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/a_labour_shortage_can_be_a_blessing_not_a_curse&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/michael_lind/recent_work">Michael Lind</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/73">The Financial Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/11">Trade &amp;amp; Globalization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/immigration">Immigration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/wages">Wages</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/39">Best of 2006</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3731 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There Goes the Rug</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/there_goes_the_rug</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announcement by IBM that it would freeze its traditional pension plan, shifting all workers into 401(k) plans by 2008, passed through the news cycle with nary a ripple. It was, after all, the latest in a string of increasingly desperate attempts by companies as diverse as GM, United and Verizon to get out from under mounting pension and healthcare burdens.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The terms of discussion are mind-numbingly complex, a thicket of acronyms and arcane benefits jargon. Yet the basic story is simple--and momentous. We are seeing the death throes of a corporate insurance system that, for decades, set the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/there_goes_the_rug&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/39">Best of 2006</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1145 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California Schemin&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2006/california_schemin</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In each era of modern American history, California has been at the forefront. It emerged from the Depression and World War II as the nation&amp;#39;s archetype of the suburban middle class. It marked the end of government expansion with Ronald Reagan and Proposition 13. And it ushered in the age of technology, as the birthplace of Apple, Intel and Hewlett-Packard. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Californians are still willing to push the envelope, as they demonstrated with the unprecedented recall of a governor in 2003 and the passage of an ambitious but untested stem-cell initiative the following year. But the creativity and risk-taking in the&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2006/california_schemin&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/david_lesher/recent_work">David Lesher</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/274">San Francisco Chronicle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/26">New America in California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/583">California Asset Building</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/3">Energy &amp;amp; Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/9">Political Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/39">Best of 2006</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1138 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Homeowner Tax Breaks are Breaking the Budget</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/homeowner_tax_breaks_are_breaking_the_budget</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President Bush&amp;#39;s tax reform panel has ventured into political no man&amp;#39;s land. It wants to limit the tax deductions for home mortgages, employer-provided health insurance and state and local taxes. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Individuals and businesses love these tax breaks. Democrats and Republicans embrace them for their own ideological reasons. The constituencies backing them are powerful. But these sacred cows are in desperate need of reform. The Treasury needs the money to close the growing budget deficit, and these tax breaks often benefit the wrong constituencies, even hurting the very economic strata they are intended to help.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The money involved&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/homeowner_tax_breaks_are_breaking_the_budget&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/maya_macguineas/recent_work">Maya MacGuineas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/42">Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/18">Fiscal Policy Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1206 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Insurance Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/insurance_policy</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly a year ago, voters following the presidential race heard a stirring call for social reform: &amp;quot;The times in which we work and live are changing dramatically. The workers of our parents&amp;#39; generation typically had one job, one skill, one career. ... And most of those workers were men. Today, workers change jobs, even careers, many times during their lives, and ... two-thirds of all moms also work outside the home.&amp;quot; As a result, &amp;quot;many of our most fundamental systems--the tax code, health coverage, pension plans, worker training--were created for the world of yesterday, not tomorrow.&amp;quot; These systems must now&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/insurance_policy&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/47">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/political_history">Political History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/privatization">Privatization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/welfare">Welfare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1189 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bigger and Better</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/bigger_and_better</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember those bumper stickers during the early-1990s fight over the Clinton health plan? &amp;quot;National Health Care? The Compassion of the IRS! The Efficiency of the Post Office! All at Pentagon Prices!&amp;quot; In American policy debates, it&amp;#39;s a fixed article of faith that the federal government is woefully bumbling and expensive in comparison with the well-oiled efficiency of the private sector. Former Congressman Dick Armey even elevated this skepticism into a pithy maxim: &amp;quot;The market is rational; government is dumb.&amp;quot;  &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;But when it comes to providing broad-based insurance -- health care, retirement pensions, disability coverage -- Armey&amp;#39;s maxim&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/bigger_and_better&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/82">The American Prospect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/4">Health Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/privatization">Privatization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/welfare">Welfare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1199 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New Insecurity</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/the_new_insecurity</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a 1938 address on the third anniversary of the Social Security Act, Franklin Roosevelt declared, &quot;There is still today a frontier that remains unconquered an America unclaimed. This is the great, the nationwide frontier of insecurity, of human want and fear. This is the frontier the America we have set ourselves to reclaim.&quot; And reclaim it FDR and his fellow thinkers did. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the three decades after Roosevelt&#039;s words were spoken, the great &quot;frontier of insecurity&quot; shrank dramatically. A massively expanded Social Security program, the GI bill, disability insurance, Medicare and Medicaid all expressed a commitment to protect Americans&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/the_new_insecurity&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/jacob_hacker/recent_work">Jacob Hacker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/114">The Boston Globe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1200 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Early Retirement Accounts are the Way Forward</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/early_retirement_accounts_are_the_way_forward</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could a reformed public pension system give citizens more control over their retirement savings, as conservatives want, without undermining security in old age, as liberals fear? Here is a proposal that does just that in the American context, although it could apply equally well to any public pension system struggling with long-term debts and an ageing population. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The idea is to allow all US workers to divert a portion of their payroll taxes into personal &amp;quot;early retirement accounts&amp;quot;, which would give individuals more control over their financial destiny and the timing of their retirement. In exchange, the age&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/early_retirement_accounts_are_the_way_forward&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/ted_halstead/recent_work">Ted Halstead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/73">The Financial Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/22">Retirement Security Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/privatization">Privatization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1182 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Managing the Cost of an Aging America</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/managing_the_cost_of_an_aging_america</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s a factual statement and two arguments about Social Security. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The factual statement is that under any retirement system, the amount of America&amp;#39;s national wealth devoted to the elderly is going to increase, for the simple reason that the elderly percentage of the population is going to increase. Today, about 13 percent of the population is over 65; by 2030, that percentage is expected to rise to 20 percent. After that, the percentage will level off -- unless, of course, a breakthrough in geriatric medicine alters those forecasts.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Now to the two arguments.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;First, since we&amp;#39;re&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/managing_the_cost_of_an_aging_america&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/james_pinkerton/recent_work">James Pinkerton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/63">Newsday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1166 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Give More Credit to Prolific Parents</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2005/give_more_credit_to_prolific_parents</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ever wonder why Social Security didn&amp;#39;t crash and burn years ago? After all, for nearly all of the program&amp;#39;s history, each generation of retirees has taken far more money out of the system than it contributed in taxes. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The answer is simple, though largely ignored in the current debate over Social Security reform. Today&amp;#39;s retirees may not have paid anywhere near as much in taxes as today&amp;#39;s workers do. But most contributed something far more valuable to the system: They created, raised and educated the baby boomers. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As my mother used to say, &amp;quot;You try doing that.&amp;quot; Children&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2005/give_more_credit_to_prolific_parents&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/44">The Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/1">Economic Growth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/6">Family &amp;amp; Children</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/demographics">Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/543">Best of 2005</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1213 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fixing Social Security</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/fixing_social_security</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Social Security is a mess. With the oldest  babyboomers now four years away from qualifying for benefits, the program faces a shortfall of $12.7 trillion. To close the deficit, the program would need to cut benefits by 27% by the time today&amp;#39;s 25-year-olds retire. And yet in this silly season, neither presidential candidate is offering a viable solution: Kerry says he won&amp;#39;t touch Social Security; Bush promises an expensive privatization plan that would leave individuals with huge market risks. But there&amp;#39;s another way. FORTUNE has learned that a new reform idea is percolating within the Social Security Administration. Nothing&amp;#39;s&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/fixing_social_security&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/phillip_longman/recent_work">Phillip Longman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/234">Fortune</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/25">The Bernard L. Schwartz Fellows Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/22">Retirement Security Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/privatization">Privatization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/issues/keywords/social_security">Social Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/544">Best of 2004</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1274 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Achieving a More Inclusive Ownership Society</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2004/achieving_a_more_inclusive_ownership_society</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;teaser-content&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President Bush&#039;s vision of an &quot;ownership society&quot; expounded on the campaign trail certainly sounds good. In his travels across the country, he touts his plan to promote Americans&#039; ability to save, invest and own their homes. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The campaign strategists may have stumbled upon a potent rhetorical device because the power of ownership has been experienced by the more fortunate families across the country. Financial success in America today increasingly requires not just a job and growing income, but the ability to accumulate a wide range of assets. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &quot;ownership society&quot; challenge appears clear enough: to maximize the number of families&amp;hellip; &lt;a href=&quot;/publications/articles/2004/achieving_a_more_inclusive_ownership_society&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- /.teaser-content --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/people/reid_cramer/recent_work">Reid Cramer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/70">The San Diego Union Tribune</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/15">Asset Building Program</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/5">Fiscal Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/8">Ownership &amp;amp; Assets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/13">Retirement Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/taxonomy/term/544">Best of 2004</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Articles</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1217 at http://www.newamerica.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
