microcredit

I've been arguing for awhile now that microcredit has been overly hyped, even dangerously so (i.e., credit will end poverty). But now media (see The Times, The Boston Globe, Foreign Policy, articles, for examples) are beginning a backlash against microcredit (likely caused in large part by failed expectations caused by said hype) that I nonetheless find equally, if not more, disturbing (i.e., microfinance isn't working). I've never thought of credit as a panacea, but I do believe financial inclusion and access to an array of asset building financial services are essential if the poor are ever to move out of poverty.

Signs point to toughening times for the microfinance industry. A recent article from the Economist has echoed my concerns that selling microcredit (as a concept or a product) will grow increasingly difficult as the global economy stumbles (or crashes and burns) on the heels of a debt-led recession in the United States.  Not only in the concept politically less appetizing than it was back when Muhammad Yunus won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006, the capital fueling the industry is drying up.  The similarities and differences between subprime lending that fueled the US recession and the "sub, sub, subprime" lending happening in developing countries through microfinance institutions have been debated and analyzed for over a year now. But only recently has the engine of seemingly-endless capital to MFIs around the world starting slowing, sputtering to slow chug in some instances.

Its last day of the Better World Campaign's On Day One project and there is still time to vote for the idea you think President-Elect Barak Obama should prioritize on the first day of the next administration for improving the United State's image in the world.  When blogger Mark Goldberg of the UN Foundation came to New America in the spring of 2008 soliciting ideas for policy proposals, I thought it was little more than a fun experiment in the use of new media to express opinions. I had no idea the Campaign would face the ideas off against each other in November, narrowing 81 selected ideas down to 9 for '09 (9 big ideas for the incoming president to consider upon taking office). Or that my idea to reform foreign assistance (to focus the allocation of funds more squarely on the social and economic empowerment of poor people) would win the Global Poverty category. Or that there would be a Round 2 to the contest in which the 9 for '09 would face off yet again.

Last month, I argued that USAID inaptly named a three-day virtual conference on savings as "The Forgotten Half of Microfinance." Instead, I posited:

"As someone working on asset building and financial inclusion for the poor (and/or their cross-fertilization in the development field), I would contend that the hosts got it wrong when chose the title for this event. Indeed, "savings" is not "forgotten" at all. Though perhaps traditionally underemphasized, I would argue that, on the contrary, savings is the in fact the "next big thing" in financial interventions."

Looks like I got this one right.

Our newly released report on thrift in the United States has gotten some good play in the media but has also sparked internal and external debate, domestically and internationally, on the importance of savings and thrift relative to credit and consumption. The report advocates a culture of thrift and a renewed focus on savings (as opposed to our current focus on credit and culture of indebtedness). As a team, the Asset Building program promotes these goals and others heavily in our domestic work as well as internationally through the Global Assets Project.