Michael Bloomberg

Note to Bloomberg: Why Not Use Charter Strategies for Pre-K?

October 7, 2009 - 9:28am

New York City Mayor Bloomberg’s plan to increase the number of charter schools in the Big Apple has generated a lot of buzz since Bloomberg announced it last week. Charter schools are independent public schools that are publicly funded, publicly accountable, and free of charge to students, but operated by independent nonprofit boards, rather than school districts. In late September, Harvard researchers released a study showing that predominantly disadvantaged students who attend New York City’s public charter schools are making more progress towards closing the achievement gap with their suburban peers than a control group of NYC students who remained in NYC public schools.

Mayor Bloomberg has proposed a number of steps to expand the number of charter schools in New York City, including raising the state cap on the number of charter schools, raising additional funding for charter school facilities, and co-locating charter schools with public housing projects.

Thursday Round Up: A Look at a Petition Firm

April 17, 2008 - 1:59pm

DEPARTMENT OF MOON HOWLING: The Las Vegas Review & Journal takes a long look at one of the country's more important signature firms, National Voter Outreach and its CEO Rick Arnold. I've interviewed Arnold in his Carson City home, and found him to be one of the more thoughtful people in the petition trade, critical of its problems and clear-eyed about its limitations. This story is built heavily around criticism from the liberal/progressive Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, which is quick to lable signature gathering as corrupt (at least in cases where it opposes the cause in question). There is a "shocked, shocked" quality to this criticism. The signature gathering business has plenty of problem workers, many of them poorly trained folks who, for lifestyle reasons, have taken a job that usually pays them in cash. But BISC and other critics invariably propopse to criminalize the process of gathering signatures, as in Oklahoma. In supporting these restrictions, liberals are hurting themselves, by establishing precedents restricting political speech that can be used by their political opponents. And such restrictions don't stop direct democracy. They merely slow it down, adding to the costs (and thus the influence of interest groups) that progressives love to denounce. The more you regulate, the more firms like National Voter Outreach will benefit.

Bloomberg Sends Arnold His Loose Change

April 10, 2008 - 8:43pm

For a man who spent $70 million getting elected mayor of New York (and contemplated dropping $500 million of his own cash on a presidential campaign), billionaire Michael Bloomberg's gift of $250,000 to the redistricting ballot initiative backed by Gov. Schwarzenegger amounts to little more than loose change from the Gracie Mansion sofa (Except it wouldn't be Gracie--Bloomberg doesn't live at the official mayoral residence). But it's a nice endorsement for the initiative campaign and the governor, who needs to portray his redistricting proposal as truly bipartisan. Bloomberg is a former Democrat, former Republican, and current independent (Note to Californians: independent is New Yorkese for "Decline to State"). Democrats are already noting that Bloomberg's own redistricting efforts in New York differed in content from the California initiative.

Syndicate content