Intelligence

This post was authored by Timothy Little, a Research Intern for The American Strategy Program

A couple months ago I commented on a new attempt by Senator Bond (R-MO) to create a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Intelligence. With the election and the financial crisis dominating much of the conversations in Congress, there has been little movement on this issue. However, recent changes in Senate chairmanships and the new WMD report released could revive this issue.

A commission chaired by Bob Graham and Jim Talent released its report on the prevention of WMD proliferation and terrorism. They concluded what many policy analysts have been saying for some time: "a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013." The year is open to debate, but it will likely be within the next decade.

However, the same report called upon Congressional leadership to "establish an Intelligence Subcommittee on the Appropriations Committees in both chambers of Congress with jurisdiction over the National Intelligence Program and Military Intelligence Program budgets."

The new Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) said in 2004 when he was Ranking Member of the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee:

My friend Siobahn Gorman over at the Wall Street Journal covered the new National Intelligence Assessment on Global Climate Change today. Here's the article.

In summarizing the NIA for Congress, Tom Fingar, the head of the National Intelligence Council who spoke here at New America a few weeks ago, said global climate change is a very real national security challenge. Here's his summary graf:

We judge global climate change will have wide-ranging implications for US national security interests over the next 20 years. Although the United States will be less affected and is better equipped than most nations to deal with climate change, and may even see a benefit owing to increases in agriculture productivity, infrastructure repair and replacement will be costly. We judge that the most significant impact for the United States will be indirect and result from climate-driven effects on many other countries and their potential to seriously affect US national security interests.

All in all, I think the statement by Fingar is solid first look at the issue by an Intelligence Community that is trying hard to get a handle on a powerful geopolitical force that requires untraditional collection and analysis.