CGI

The Clinton Global Initiative is coming to a close and as I sit here listening to Gordon Brown talk about the importance of the global economy and the gap between the rich and poor, I find myself also thinking about the images of Drew Barrymore, Matt Damon, Muhammad Yunus, Bono, Bill Gates, Wylclef Jean and Bill Clinton on my camera, and last nights performances of James Taylor and Yousoo Ndour's.  Waking up from my day dream, I realize that this conference could have easily succumbed to three days of a star-studded, papparazzi-riddled social affair.  And perhaps in some ways it is.  

But as I go through the notes I've taken over the last three days, I am quite pleasantly surprised by the amount of substance and the breadth of issues and innovations covered over the last three days. Indeed, I'm so impressed that I find myself at the end of this conference in 30 minutes unwilling to end my blogging on its sessions and commitments.  Over the next week, I plan to continue providing commentary on CGI sessions, issue areas and commitments. Here is a sampling of topics I plan to cover:

• Asset Building Beyond Microfinance? The Forgotten Bottom and the Missing Middle
• Rural Finance: a New Frontier for Global Asset Building?
• Technology, Information and the New Age of Access
• Energy, Climate Change and Sustainable Development: An Opportunity for Microfinance?
• Food Prices Shifting Microfinance Focus?
• CGI Commitments:  My Top 10 List

At this morning's opening plenary, members of the CGI searched for open seats while the the press groaned about the lack of space, sat on the floor, weaseled their way onto members-only tables and the national press complained about the lack of exclusive press pools just for their reporters and cameras.  Needless to say, there was a lot of nervous energy in the room, waiting to hear form presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama provides the opening and closing remarks to a panel on Integrated Solution to water, food and energy crises.  Or maybe just to hear them talk. But I figured that with all the commotion surrounding their appearance here, I would be remiss not to cover their remarks on the Ladder, despite (sadly) the lack of any direct comment on asset building. 

All day yesterday, I capitalized on the opportunity to unabashedly promote the asset building framework by putting a spotlight on its prominence in poverty alleviation discussions and commitments here at CGI.  And I actually barely skimmed the surface of some of the specific asset-focused activities coming out of these sessions (Habitat, others).  As much as I relished it, I also want to acknowledge that asset building and financial services for the poor are one piece of poverty alleviation in a complex global environment.  The specific commitments are great, but what about the larger perspective?

Yesterday's afternoon CGI held a plenary on profits, jobs and equitable growth.  The stifling of poverty alleviation around the world is not simply due to lack of access to effective financial services, but also to lack of access to property, to opportunity, to education and to healthcare.  Exclusion from any combination of these often results market inefficiencies, slack productivity, an inability for an individual to live to their full human potential.  Hernando de Soto called for property rights and legal empowerment of the poor to give them the tools they need to achieve their version of the American Dream. 

There is still much to learn about the financial tools needed to help the world's poor mitigate risks and build assets in order to build an economic base and contribute to long-term economic development. This session primarily focused on "building assets in the developing world."

Sylvia Matthews , director of Global Development at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation opened the second working group session stating that 2.3 billion with no access to financial services for the poor, even though evidence suggests they would make perfect customers. She asked her panelists: "What do people need, what works, what are some solutions and how do we reach scale?" Again, asset building and asset protection products reigned supreme:

Bob Rubin, the first Director of National Economic Council, then Secretary of the Treasury, and now a Director at Citigroup, Inc remarked on the health of the financial system and impact on financial services for the poor. "We need to stem the crisis of confidence in the US now, but we also need to put into place effective responses to longer-term problems the country faces, like healthcare, education and economic opportunities for the poor."

When I walked around yesterday's CGI exchange, getting a convention-style glimpse into the organizations and corporations making commitments to poverty alleviation this year, I was particularly excited to see not only institutions focused on financial services for the poor, but particular, savings and asset-building. Yes, the actual word - asset-building - at the CGI. Considered by some as an inaccessible term to describe wealth creation opportunities for the poor, I am thrilled to see it permeate the global microfinance field (as I assumed it would). Oweesta, the CDFI running IDA and other asset intervention work in native American communities in the USA, seems the only organization focused on empowerment of native communities, and if carrying the AB message in all of their materials. And Oxfam, who have been running a Gates-funded Savings for Change program (informal rotating savings groups mobilizing deposits for those still completely untouched by formal microfinance) for a few years around the world, have added the term asset building to the September version of the program's one pager.

Last night, in the few minutes we weren’t talking about the financial crisis and the impending bailout, President Clinton waxed political on the potential for energy investment in the United States.  According to the President, the near-certain reality of approving legislation liberalizing off-shore drilling should be seen as a political opportunity for progressives interested in sustainable environment and combating climate change. But if we’re going to “give” drilling to the right, the left should negotiate hard for the environment, including: