<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net/blog" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Free Paul Jacob</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/free-paul-jacob</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Judge Removed In &#039;Oklahoma 3&#039; Case</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/judge-removed-oklahoma-3-case-5560</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The folks at Free Paul Jacob and some Oklahoma reporters are suspicious about the reasons for the removal of a conservative judge Bill Graves from the so-called &amp;quot;Oklahoma 3&amp;quot; case, the ongoing criminal proescution of Term Limits advocate Paul Jacob and two other people involved in collecting signatures on ballot initiatives in that state. The Free Paul Jacob &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.freepauljacob.com/2008/07/31/ok-3-judge-removed-from-case/&quot;&gt;blog &lt;/a&gt;thinks this may have something to do with Paul Jacob. But it&#039;s not clear that&#039;s the case. Graves had some 2,400 of his criminal cases reassigned. News &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=20080729_12_A11_spancl794733&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; suggest that there may be political reasons for the overall reassignments--specifically Graves&#039; denouncing of new rules on judges as part of a &amp;quot;homosexual agenda.&amp;quot; Interesting times in the Oklahoma courts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/judge-removed-oklahoma-3-case-5560#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/ballot-initiative">Ballot Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/bill-graves-0">Bill Graves</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/free-paul-jacob">Free Paul Jacob</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/oklahoma-3-0">Oklahoma 3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/paul-jacob">Paul Jacob</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/signature-gathering-0">Signature Gathering</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5560 at http://www.newamerica.net/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Paul Jacob Fears Prison Riots?</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/paul-jacob-fears-prison-riots-4149</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The leader of the term limits movement and two other organizers of a petition drive in Oklahoma are under state indictment there on charges they broke laws related to out of state signature gathering. The indictment lookis like an over-the-top attempt by state attorney general Drew Edmondson to criminalize signature gathering in a state that is already the most difficult state to qualify an initiative in. Oklahoma has the shortest time period for gathering signatures -- 90 days -- which in and of itself puts the lie to claims by officials there that they want to make signature gathering a grass roots process. With such a short time period, paid petition circulators are the only way to qualify a measure; no grass roots operation can gather enough signatures that fast. (This is a point that Bob Stern makes in his excellent new &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cgs.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=164:PUBLICATIONS&amp;amp;catid=39:all_pubs&amp;amp;Itemid=72&quot;&gt;report &lt;/a&gt;on the initiaitve process in California; he argues that time period be extended in the Golden State, from 150 days to a year, to permit grass roots groups to gather signatures).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s an entertaining blog, Free Paul Jacob, that focuses on the case. A look at legal precedent suggests that eventually, Jacob and his co-defendants, who are free on bail, will beat these charges. But there&#039;s enough worry that the site is &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.freepauljacob.com/2008/05/20/only-a-couple-inmates-killed/&quot;&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt; about a prison fight at the Oklahoma State Reformatory. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/paul-jacob-fears-prison-riots-4149#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/drew-edmondson">Drew Edmondson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/free-paul-jacob">Free Paul Jacob</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/paul-jacob">Paul Jacob</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4149 at http://www.newamerica.net/blog</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
