<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newamerica.net/blog" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Proposition 99</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-99-0</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>98 Ends Rent Control, 99 Undermines Mom and Pop</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/98-ends-rent-control-99-undermines-mom-and-pop-4315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At the LA Weekly, Jill Stewart &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/eminent-domain-targeted-by-propositions-98-and-99/18999/&quot;&gt;deconstructs&lt;/a&gt; the two competing California ballot initiatives to limit eminent domain. Prop 98 puts more restrictions on government&#039;s ability to take land for private development. Stewart argues that the two main things to know are these. Prop 98 would end rent control (a provision added to attract funding for the initiative) and Prop 99 would protect some homeowners but would leave cities free to take the land of mom-and-pop stores.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/98-ends-rent-control-99-undermines-mom-and-pop-4315#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/ballot-initiatives">Ballot Initiatives</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/eminent-domain">Eminent Domain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-98">Proposition 98</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-99-0">Proposition 99</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4315 at http://www.newamerica.net/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scaring the Seniors</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/scaring-seniors-4185</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This new No on Prop 98 ad ( the more conservative of the two measures to limit eminent domain in California) shamelessly doesn&#039;t even mention eminent domain. Instead, it attempts to frighten seniors by highlighting an AARP endorsement and suggesting old folks will be kicked out of their homes. The initiative does limit rent control, but this exaggeration is pretty gross.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div height=&quot;355&quot; width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;
&lt;div name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/SqANQQQno3g&amp;amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;object classid=&quot;clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000&quot; codebase=&quot;http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;width&quot; value=&quot;425&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;height&quot; value=&quot;355&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;src&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/SqANQQQno3g&amp;amp;hl=en&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/SqANQQQno3g&amp;amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div height=&quot;355&quot; width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div height=&quot;355&quot; width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s the Yes on 98 ad, which isn&#039;t any more honest. It omits the fact that the initiative would end rent control. And according to the LA Times, the woman who claims her home was seized actually sold it -- 30 years ago -- after there was a threat of eminent domain.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div height=&quot;355&quot; width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div height=&quot;355&quot; width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div height=&quot;355&quot; width=&quot;425&quot;&gt;
&lt;div name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/_ydNX0gzx5M&amp;amp;rel=0&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;object classid=&quot;clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000&quot; codebase=&quot;http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;width&quot; value=&quot;425&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;height&quot; value=&quot;355&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;src&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/_ydNX0gzx5M&amp;amp;rel=0&quot; /&gt;&lt;embed type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/_ydNX0gzx5M&amp;amp;rel=0&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/scaring-seniors-4185#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/eminent-domain">Eminent Domain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-98">Proposition 98</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-99-0">Proposition 99</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/television-ads-0">Television Ads</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4185 at http://www.newamerica.net/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PPIC Poll: California Eminent Domain Measures Lack Majority</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/ppic-poll-california-eminent-domain-measures-lack-majority-4165</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A new &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_508MBS.pdf&quot;&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt; from the Public Policy Institute of California finds that the two competing eminent domain measures, Propositions 98 (backed by conservatives, anti-tax groups) and Prop 99 (backed by cities), have less than 50 percent support. Less than two weeks before an election, that often spells doom for both measures. As such, this would be a victory for the backers of Prop 99, who qualified the measure in order to beat Prop. 98. Qualifying your own measure to defeat one you don&#039;t like is a time-tested tactic. In most cases, both initiatives go down. Each initiaitve purports to restrict the ability of governments to take property for private purposes, though Prop 98&#039;s protections are stronger--so strong the initiative also would eliminate rent control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In other findings, the poll shows that Gov. Schwarzenegger&#039;s lottery plan is unpopular with the public--and his back-up proposal, a one-cent sales tax increase, has support from a narrow majority.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/ppic-poll-california-eminent-domain-measures-lack-majority-4165#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/arnold-schwarzenegger">Arnold Schwarzenegger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/eminent-domain">Eminent Domain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-98">Proposition 98</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-99-0">Proposition 99</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/sales-tax-increase">Sales Tax Increase</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/schwarzenegger">Schwarzenegger</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4165 at http://www.newamerica.net/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Prop 98 and 99</title>
 <link>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/prop-98-and-99-ballot-guide-3837</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a San Jose Mercury News &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_9209873&quot;&gt;look&lt;/a&gt; at the two measures. One thing that distinguishes Prop 98 from 99 is the former&#039;s elimination of rent control, which is why it&#039;s backed by owners of apartment buildings and trailer parks, including Tribune Company chairman Sam Zell. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/prop-98-and-99-ballot-guide-3837#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/ballot-initiatives">Ballot Initiatives</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/initiatives">Initiatives</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/mercury-news-0">Mercury News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-98">Proposition 98</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/topics/proposition-99-0">Proposition 99</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3837 at http://www.newamerica.net/blog</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
