<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nafonline.net/blog" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Calbuzz</title>
 <link>http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/calbuzz</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Why Constitutional Convention Must Consider Prop 13</title>
 <link>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2009/why-constitutional-convention-must-consider-prop-13-13021</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;New America senior scholar Mark Paul, writing at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/constitutional-convention-must-consider-prop-13/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Calbuzz&lt;/a&gt;, makes a very strong case for making sure that Prop 13 is considered by a constitutional convention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given its centrality to governance in California, it&#039;s shocking that drafts of the initiative to call the convention specifically keep Prop 13 out of it. And pointless, too. Like putting together a meeting to discuss football but saying you won&#039;t mention the passing game. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2009/why-constitutional-convention-must-consider-prop-13-13021#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/ballot-initiative-2">Ballot Initiative</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/calbuzz">Calbuzz</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/constitutional-convention-0">Constitutional Convention</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/mark-paul">Mark Paul</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13021 at http://nafonline.net/blog</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

