<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nafonline.net/blog" xmlns:dc="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Marijuana Legalization</title>
 <link>http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/marijuana-legalization</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Would Gay Marriage Initiative Benefit From Marijuana Legalization Measure?</title>
 <link>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2009/would-gay-marriage-initiative-benefit-marijuana-legalization-measure-1326</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Supporters of same-sex marriage seem to be moving to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&amp;amp;entry_id=43580&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;delay&lt;/a&gt; a ballot initiative campaign to overturn Prop 8 and legalize such marriages from 2010 until 2012. Their thinking is that they need more time to convert voters, and that the 2012 electorate will be larger -- and younger, and thus more inclined to back same-sex marriage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I wonder if they&#039;re right about that. The 2010 ballot in California could draw a number of young and new voters sympathetic to same sex marriage for one reason: an initiative legalizing marijuana. I have not seen polling on this (does anyone out there have surveys to share), but one would suspect that there&#039;s more than a little overlap between supporters of legalizing pot possession and legalizing same-sex marriage. (Your blogger, for the record, thinks the case for legalizing same-sex marriage is strong and the case for legalizing marijuana is weak). The marijuana initiative is likely to dominate the news and public discussion. That could help the cause of same-sex marriage. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2009/would-gay-marriage-initiative-benefit-marijuana-legalization-measure-1326#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/ballot-initiatives">Ballot Initiatives</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/marijuana-legalization">Marijuana Legalization</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/same-sex-marriage-0">Same Sex Marriage</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:19:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13269 at http://nafonline.net/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wait &#039;Til 2012 On Same Sex Marriage?</title>
 <link>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2009/wait-til-2012-same-sex-marriage-13240</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Some gay rights groups say they need more time to convince voters to back legalization of same-sex marriage in California, the LA Times &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop8-2009jul14,0,7577908.story&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;. Reaction: this may be too cautious, but there may be advantages to waiting. One developing problem with the 2010 ballot is that it appears likely to be crowded with high profile measures on taxation, budgeting, the constitutional convention and, of course, marijuana legalization.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2009/wait-til-2012-same-sex-marriage-13240#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/ballot-initiatives">Ballot Initiatives</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/marijuana-legalization">Marijuana Legalization</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/same-sex-marriage">Same-Sex Marriage</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13240 at http://nafonline.net/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Get Your Pot Elsewhere</title>
 <link>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/get-your-pot-elsewhere-4377</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mendocino County has &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080604/NEWS/806040393/1033/NEWS/Mendocino_pot_repeal_heads_for_passage&quot;&gt;voted&lt;/a&gt; to repeal loose standards that made the California county a haven for marijuana growers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://nafonline.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/2008/get-your-pot-elsewhere-4377#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/which-blog/blockbuster-democracy">Blockbuster Democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/marijuana-legalization">Marijuana Legalization</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/measure-b">Measure B</category>
 <category domain="http://nafonline.net/blog/topics/mendocino-county">Mendocino County</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Mathews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4377 at http://nafonline.net/blog</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

