New Health Dialogue - logo
 

HEALTH REFORM: Obama's Vision

June 3, 2009 - 5:20pm

The White House has posted  President Obama's letter to Senators Ted Kennedy and Max Baucus on health care reform. He reiterated his vision (and ours) that reform is an economic as well as a moral imperative. And he added a few points (and $$$) we hadn't heard before:

In addition to the $635 billion reserve fund Obama outlined this Winter in his budget proposal, (some of which Congress balked at) he's calling for an additional $200 to $300 billion over 10 years in Medicare and Medicaid savings. This isn't from slashing the entitlement benefits but by taking steps to better manage chronic diseases, utilize health services more wisely, and reduce the revolving door of hospital readmissions. We waste a lot of money on care that doesn't make people any better.

Obama said he was "open" to the idea of giving more clout to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), which currently gives nonbinding but respected advice to Congress. In a post-reform world, MedPAC's recommendations on cost reductions would be adopted, unless opposed by a joint resolution of the Congress.T hat's modeled on military base closure system. (We published a paper on MedPAC a few months ago, and our colleague Tom Emswiler is working on a post about it that we hope to have for you soon).

During the campaign, Obama did not endorse the individual mandate (or "shared responsibility" as it's now known) but in this letter he was open to it, as long as health care costs are being brought down and there are "hardship exemptions" for certain individuals. Ditto for small businesses. Some should be exempt from any employer mandate. We didn't spot any explicit mention of the debate over whether to tax a portion of employer-sponsored health benefits, although news reports have said he may be able to accept the idea.

To summarize a few other elements of his vision of health reform:

  • It's not just about coverage. "Indeed, without a serious, sustained effort to reduce the growth rate of health care costs, affordable health care coverage will remain out of reach," he wrote.
  • Americans should have better choices for health insurance, building on the principle that if they like the coverage they have now, they can keep it, while seeing their costs lowered as reforms take hold.
  • Creating a health insurance exchange— a market where Americans can one-stop shop for a health care plan, compare benefits and prices, and choose the plan that's best for them, in the same way that Members of Congress and their families can.
  • No one should be denied coverage  because of their health history
  • All plans should have an affordable basic benefit package that includes prevention, and protection against catastrophic costs.
  • Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans. This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest.

Obama concluded:

I know that you have reached out to Republican colleagues, as I have, and that you have worked hard to reach a bipartisan consensus about many of these issues. I remain hopeful that many Republicans will join us in enacting this historic legislation that will lower health care costs for families, businesses, and governments, and improve the lives of millions of Americans. So, I appreciate your efforts, and look forward to working with you so that the Congress can complete health care reform by October.

Healthcare reform

As a Vietnam era vet, I no longer have access to VA care unless I am "destitute". My job and coverage went to China years ago.
My option? Go to the emergency room and stick (somebody) with the bill. A total waste of money compared to a clinic, but the clinic will not take non-payers.

Oh well!
John

The whole idea of a

The whole idea of a government sponsored insurance system is quite alarming. Physicians who have trained in any VA (Veterean Affairs) hospital will surely report the difficulty in caring for patients. To think the governent can run a system with any real efficiency seems outrageous.

Physicians were paid better by medicare and certainly private insurance over 10-15 years ago. As the cost of living, eduction, and running a practice has increased reimbursement decreased even faster. There isn’t less money to pay for providers, the insurance industry just wants is redistributed into their own pockets. The government (thanks to the Clintons) have paved the road for the mess we are in now by erroneously thinking they could “cook-book” a field that is truly an art and very individualized. In addition, allowing insurance companies to set rates is silly.

Most physicians have to see a tremendous volume to pay expenses and many errors are created because we cannot spend the time to follow everything under these constraints. My rent, salaries, benefits, malpractice increases every year but my fee schedule goes down.
Obama will not fix this with his socialist ideas. If they want physicians to be bound by government regulated fees and procdures then pay me back for the student loans, cover my malpractice and rent, pay my employees and their benefits and let me work 40 hours a week and not have to take call!

We are providing professional services and like any service industry we should be able to charge and be paid what we think we are worth for our expertise, skill, and ability. Most of us were not able to start “earning” until we were 30+ and need to pay off debt and save for a future. We were 10 years behind our firends who worked in business or other industries. We need to catch up.

Imagine Obama telling his attorney colleagues - the government is going to set your hourly rates!