HEALTH POLITICS: Yes WE Can
I shared my initial reactions to President Obama's address to Congress last night on the National Journal's Health Care Experts Blog and the The New York Times' Prescriptions blog.
From the National Journal:
President Obama made two key points tonight. Number one, and most practically, he is still willing to compromise with those who still have an open mind, despite the way implacable ideological opponents have behaved this August (and before, and still tonight, Mr. Joe Wilson (R-SC), and no doubt tomorrow and forever). He signalled this through his willingness to implement malpractice reform, taxes on high-end benefit packages, and linking the pace of coverage expansion with realized system savings. The latter in particular signalled both his commitment to fiscal responsibility and his confidence that so many experts we can all name are correct, we can reduce cost growth while improving quality.
Number two, he framed his commitment to reform in moral terms, and challenged us all, and specific senators, to remember both the better angels of our nature -- the character of our country -- and the bipartisan nature of Senator Kennedy's most lasting achievements. Quite simply, he called on us to become the great nation we imagine ourselves to be or want to be, and in so doing, he elevated the issue out of partisan morass and into a compelling vision for a stronger, more united country facing 21st century challenges with an abiding faith that we shall indeed continue to overcome.
From The New York Times:
The president made clear tonight that he is committed to solving our health care coverage and cost problems. He is willing to work with anyone — Democrat, Republican or independent — who is also interested in real solutions. He was equally clear that those who oppose enabling all Americans to afford health care had better be prepared to explain to families and employers why their urgent need for relief from killer cost increases should be postponed, once again, to protect the interests of those who profit from today’s inefficient and unfair system. I could not agree more.
I also heard three important themes:
- Reaffirmation. The president confirmed his strong commitment to key goals of reform. All Americans must have quality, affordable health coverage, and we will not add to the deficit to achieve that goal.
- Flexibility. The president signalled he was open to work[ing] with both sides to find common ground on three contentious issues: a public health insurance option, taxing high-cost benefits and medical malpractice reform. A public option that is “triggered” when competition is lacking and prices are too high is a brilliant way to square the circle of this overly contentious issue. Taxing insurers who offer high-cost benefits would be a major step forward in slowing the rate of health care cost growth and making coverage affordable for the long-term. I am particularly impressed with the president’s willingness to start down the road to medical malpractice reform immediately. Some kind of medical malpractice reform should be part of any comprehensive reform package.
- Coverage expansion and delivery system savings are and must be linked. The president thinks that coverage expansion and delivery system reform should be linked by policies that reinforce each other. No reform insight is more true. Both are key to achieving and maintaining coverage for all and a sound fiscal future for our nation.
- Login to post comments


















Obama and healthcare
Health care or not, I’m partisan to a president that can lower my taxes and fix what the housing market “greed” created… Just get the job market back up and avoid more scams…
Health Politics: Yes WE Can
In my estimation after over 30 years of concerted efforts in health services research to contain costs while improving quality of care, I have come to the conclusion that we are blind to certain fundamental facts of life and remain in denial about them. Until we realize the flaws in two of our assumptions, no reform can work, in my opinion.
First, life is a terminal condition. If we do not come to grips with our mortality and understanding that health care to prolong our time until that certain destiny starts with our own healthier behaviors no reform will work. Further, those among us that are predisposed to a shorter life span due to family history or other congenital "givens" must also come to grips with our variable fixed spans of time we get dealt to us and stop expecting the false promise of medicine to make us immortal can or should be realized. We must learn to welcome our own ends when we know it is our time and leave with dignity and a sense of completion to our calling. Otherwise, the system will continue to expend most of the cost of all the costs we incur in our lives trying to forestall the certainty of dying.
Second, a health system driven by the profit motive cannot deliver what reform expects it too. I long ago read and concluded from the clinical-financial data used extensively to manage care and manage the health system that profits cannot be made from treating sick people. Really sick-as-hell people are a financially devastating effect regardless of how many contribute to the risk pool. The reality of this fatal flaw of the profit motive in health care is illustrated by the fears people have stirred up by being pummeled by extreme groups touting that "death panels will be formed to deny care to Grandma, who will then be forced to a certain death!" Ironically, it is the fear mongers behind these ads who are already at work issuing proxy death sentences motivated by profits! My own brother-in-law, aged 55, just recently lost his insurance in the middle of fighting a hospital-acquired infection following intestinal surgery - MRSA - and then needing another surgery to remove kidney stones that cannot be passed. When trying to get his insurance reinstated on his own, he was told he would have to wait 90 days. The hospital says that unless he can pay the $16,000 the surgery costs, they will not let the surgeon do the surgery on his kidney. By the time he gets re-insured or can come up with the money himself, he could die from the infection or the kidney stones. In my judgment, death panels are already at work under the current system!
In short our society needs to make fundamental changes in its belief system and learn to die well, while the providers and the payers need to accept a much lower profit margin than they have, to date, before any full-coverage reform can work. The food distribution industry - grocery store chains, for example, have long understood that their margins would always be 1-3%. They are just now learning along with the food manufacturers that healthier food might be more profitable in the long run and the right thing to do to keep us all out of the sick-care system longer.
The old saying, "an apple a day keeps the doctor away" might also keep the insurance company away and reduce the pressure to try to reform a system trying to make a profit off of sick people.
The alternatively reformed system then would produce a society where the cause of death for the vast majority of us would be reaching a ripe old age, dying in your own bed at home, suddenly, during sleep. Those of us with terminal conditions before our preferred time to die, but way too costly and medically heroic to save us would be given good spiritual counseling with our loved ones, proper palliative care, and a comforting exit. RIP